Lingenfelter cams?
I had Mac shorty headers, stock cat back, GTP stage II heads, 211/219 cam 52MM Tb and Ed Wright mail order chip ( 93 were still chips ). M6 with 3:42 gears
I made 327 RWHP, 330 torque on a portable dyno peaking at 5600RPMs. I had to leave the line soft and ran consistent 13.0-13.1 at 109MPH of street tires. Car passed emmisions far cleaner then stock!
The 211/219 is a torque monter of a cam from 2000 RPMs to around 5600RPMs it pulled increadable hard. I could walk LS1 and LT1 cars with the hotcam with no effort. But as you get into the upper RPMs the cam deffinitely fell off. The cam just didnt have enough duration to move enough air in the upper RPMs.
For a pure street car the cam is killer, Cam has a slight chop at idle, little more lope then a HotCam, but nothing radical. Just enough to give a hint there is something going on.
My .02
John
Last edited by Pampered-Z; Sep 25, 2007 at 04:00 PM.
I had Mac shorty headers, stock cat back, GTP stage II heads, 211/219 cam 52MM Tb and Ed Wright mail order chip ( 93 were still chips ). M6 with 3:42 gears
I made 327 RWHP, 330 torque on a portable dyno peaking at 5600RPMs. I had to leave the line soft and ran consistent 13.0-13.1 at 109MPH of street tires. Car passed emmisions far cleaner then stock!
The 211/219 is a torque monster of a cam from 2000 RPMs to around 5600RPMs it pulled incredable hard. I could walk LS1 and LT1 cars with the hotcam with no effort. But as you get into the upper RPMs the cam deffinitely fell off. The cam just didnt have enough duration to move enough air in the upper RPMs.
For a pure street car the cam is killer, Cam has a slight chop at idle, little more lope then a HotCam, but nothing radical. Just enough to give a hint there is something going on.
My .02
John
That's very descriptive John, thanks! Sounds like something i'm after. I want a cam that's not too radical but delivers good power. The lpe 211/219 is something i will consider then. The only question i have is that you were saying it falls apart on the top end? My concern is that, I do play around with a few LS1 friends from time to time. Will this cam not be good starting from a role? Or is there another step up from the 211/219, yet will still be good for weekend driving (it's not a dd).
how does the 219/219 compare to the 211/219
or the 215/220
Im looking for a cam slightly smaller than 230 on the intake side and maybe a little more on exhaust and cant find a good one.
Most gen 1 and Gen 2 smallblock Chevy heads flow relatively well on the intake side compared to the exhaust so the extra exhaust duration and sometimes lift you see is done as a bandaid.
Maybe you should consider the 846, not a lingenfelter but is a solid midsized choice.
Most gen 1 and Gen 2 smallblock Chevy heads flow relatively well on the intake side compared to the exhaust so the extra exhaust duration and sometimes lift you see is done as a bandaid.
Maybe you should consider the 846, not a lingenfelter but is a solid midsized choice.
My point about the cam falling off is just that. If you're thinking of spinning up around 6200-6400 to run with the LS1 then I really don't think this is the right cam for you. The thing is that the trend seems to be the big 847 and 306 cams in stock bottom ends and then people spin up to or above 6,500RPMs. I personally think that is going a bit high. With my 211/219 I hit peak HP at 5,600 so I set my shift light to 5,800 (so by the time I shifted I was around 6,000, Rev limiter set at 6200) so I went just a bit past peak, not spinning for no reason and when I shifted I didn't drop out of the power band. I installed the mods with just over 30K on it and pulled the engine at 80K and the internals looked perfect for those miles. I contribute allot of it to the fact I didn't spin the engine too high.
So I think the 211/219 is a good cam. Right now if I built another N/A engine I would actually like to see how the GM846 222/230 542/563(1.6 rockers) would run, but not sure it could pass the sniffer? This seems to be the next step up from the 211/219 with just slightly more lift and duration and I think it would still have good street manners and not require the engine spun too high (maybe push peak up 300-400 RPMs?).
Either way the 211/219 was a nice cam on the street and with my car was it seemed to match very well with the 3:42 gears. ( remember I have a 93 so I have different gear ratios in my trans, the 3:42s are close to 3:73 in 1-2 gears ). this made for a nice combination of street car that ran very consistent at the track. I know I wasn't as fast as some of the other guys with this cam either.
Last edited by Pampered-Z; Sep 26, 2007 at 04:21 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
When I rebuild I am going 383, and assuming all my tolerances are within spec and my shop gives me the go ahead I will reuse the same cam. Ported heads with a high lift and mid-to-low duration cam is the way to go for a DD or car that sees more street then strip IMO.
My tuner is also very pleased I didnt jump on the "huge cam and 6500+rpm" bandwagon
. Not saying a 24x duration beast with a 4400 stall and 4.10s wouldnt be a blast at the track, but I wouldn't want to drive one to work every day
When I rebuild I am going 383, and assuming all my tolerances are within spec and my shop gives me the go ahead I will reuse the same cam. Ported heads with a high lift and mid-to-low duration cam is the way to go for a DD or car that sees more street then strip IMO.
My tuner is also very pleased I didnt jump on the "huge cam and 6500+rpm" bandwagon
. Not saying a 24x duration beast with a 4400 stall and 4.10s wouldnt be a blast at the track, but I wouldn't want to drive one to work every day 
A huge cam isn't always better, even with a 383...
--Alan
Last edited by tscheu5452; Nov 3, 2007 at 09:08 AM.
Of course a huge donkey dick cam isnt good for a daily driver, so the smaller or better drivable cams are good for a daily car..



