Whats worth replacing, master or slave?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Sep 6, 2005 | 07:17 PM

Junior

Thread Starter

11 Second Club

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 79

Likes: 0

From: Palatine

Whats worth replacing, master or slave?

About to do the clutch on my car, went FI over the weekend and it slips over 6000rpm and just curious, i have a 2000 F-body with the old style hydrolics, should i replace the master and slave with the new 2001+ style or just the slave? I have a little over 90,000 miles on the car? Thanks

Sep 6, 2005 | 07:28 PM

Ferocity02

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (60)

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 9,397

Likes: 4

I'd just do the slave for now. That seems to be the main problem part. My old master is working great with the newer slave.

Sep 6, 2005 | 07:42 PM

Junior

Thread Starter

11 Second Club

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 79

Likes: 0

From: Palatine

Hey ferocity02, Im the one that bought the procharger from you, love it so far, sealed the intercooler and running great. Thanks about the slave suggestion.

Sep 16, 2005 | 11:51 AM

JasonWW

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 6,814

Likes: 3

From: Hou. TX.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferocity02

I'd just do the slave for now. That seems to be the main problem part. My old master is working great with the newer slave.

Is that true? I always thought it was the master than was the more important piece.

How did the engagment points and overall feel change with the newer slave and the original master?