Under the curve power?
Under the curve power? I was out doing a little tuning and decided to video this. Let's see what you guys got. I think mysetup has pretty fat torque band for a 346 with unported heads and small cam. 3.42 gears in 4th gear.
50-60 = 1.71 seconds (2300-2800 rpm)
60-70 = 1.562 (2800-3250)
70-80 = 1.576 (3250-3680)
80-90 = 1.962 (3680-4180) 3 degree's knock retard @ 4000 rpm doh!
90-100 = 1.735 (4180-4640)
100-110 = 1.665 (4640-5100)
110-120 = 1.636 (5100-5550)
120-130 = 2.137 (5550-6000)
130-140 = 2.73 (6000-6450)
All in all pretty linear acceleration I would say, and as you can how big of a factor wind resistance becomes above 120 mph.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2flc_dwVuo
50-60 = 1.71 seconds (2300-2800 rpm)
60-70 = 1.562 (2800-3250)
70-80 = 1.576 (3250-3680)
80-90 = 1.962 (3680-4180) 3 degree's knock retard @ 4000 rpm doh!
90-100 = 1.735 (4180-4640)
100-110 = 1.665 (4640-5100)
110-120 = 1.636 (5100-5550)
120-130 = 2.137 (5550-6000)
130-140 = 2.73 (6000-6450)
All in all pretty linear acceleration I would say, and as you can how big of a factor wind resistance becomes above 120 mph.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2flc_dwVuo
I gained a lot going from an LS6 intake to a ported 85mm Fast I did and installing an underdrive pulley. The car pulls so much better and looking at old logs I have picked up quite a bit. Should be over 430rwhp / 400 tq no problem now. Not bad for unported 243's and a custom 224 cam 
Correct, Open loop speed density with maf delete. MAF failure set to Mil on 1st error reported. I suppose I can shut the light off, since I know it's in SD, but I have not done so yet.
It's not the greatest, 275/40-17 Nexen tires. Will blow them off if I hammer it in 1st at 2500 rpm and if I shift hard into 2nd the car goes sideways laying rubber up to 70 mph. My Midwest Chassis 9" with 4.11's will be in shortly, I will post more vids with the 4.11's. Traction will be a lot worse but now I won't have to worry about destroying the 10 bolt at the track with slicks.
Also with the cutout open I gain 17 hp / 13 tq and it was closed on that video. Here is a little burnout with cutout open when I had the LS6 intake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYIqTCqFy7U
It's not the greatest, 275/40-17 Nexen tires. Will blow them off if I hammer it in 1st at 2500 rpm and if I shift hard into 2nd the car goes sideways laying rubber up to 70 mph. My Midwest Chassis 9" with 4.11's will be in shortly, I will post more vids with the 4.11's. Traction will be a lot worse but now I won't have to worry about destroying the 10 bolt at the track with slicks.
Also with the cutout open I gain 17 hp / 13 tq and it was closed on that video. Here is a little burnout with cutout open when I had the LS6 intake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYIqTCqFy7U
Last edited by Nitroused383; Apr 18, 2010 at 09:15 PM.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: Dallas (Richardson), TX, USA
Be sure you factor in the fact that as you increase speed, the resistance against the car increases exponentially. So, while your 50-60 and 110-120 times may be very similar, your car is doing a LOT more work in the same amount of time at the higher speed. In short, this isn't a very scientific test.
Be sure you factor in the fact that as you increase speed, the resistance against the car increases exponentially. So, while your 50-60 and 110-120 times may be very similar, your car is doing a LOT more work in the same amount of time at the higher speed. In short, this isn't a very scientific test.
Well guys I have confirmed my suspicions of my "power under the curve". 365 rwtq @ 3000 rpm, thats 30 ft lbs more than my bolt on car made at peak torque! 414 max torque now 
Check here for more info https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...nderdrive.html
Check here for more info https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...nderdrive.html
