Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

shes here! new cobra!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2005, 06:25 PM
  #41  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
BOONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: council bluffs Iowa
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default cool and uncool

I like the face, but too much bumper protrudence, and because i bought a 68 in 74. The butt on the other hand is ugly, and dont fit with the front. The motor and drivetrain sound cool and stout, with a lot of potential. (good stuff)
But not in red I lust for my 68 and think of her often I love all things powerful, but they must be pretty,very pretty...
Old 04-01-2005, 09:33 AM
  #42  
11 Second Truck Club
 
2bseen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: scottsboro, al
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

When will it be for sale?
Old 04-01-2005, 08:53 PM
  #43  
TECH Fanatic
 
NastySSoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Stuart Fl
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I love my SS, but thats a sweet car!
Old 04-02-2005, 03:29 PM
  #44  
TECH Resident
 
SixPak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: dallas,tx.
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by obZidian
It should be quick to but would like to see the curb weight.....450hp, should be in the 12'z maybe 11'z with a good driver....
According to April 4 AutoWeek mag., weight is estimated (mfr) @ 3600lbs.

They are also claiming (mfr, again) 0-60mph times of 4.5 seconds.

If this is true, I think this car's HP is being underated by Ford SVT.

but haven't they over-rated these things in the past?

Old 04-02-2005, 09:59 PM
  #45  
TECH Enthusiast
 
|Drew|'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NW Houston
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

are they saying it's got a whipple instead of a typical ford supercharger (eaton)??? if so...pulley it up and the whipples are good for over 600rwhp on a regular 03/4 cobra.
Old 04-03-2005, 09:41 AM
  #46  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
LS1 Sounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I like that car a lot!
Old 04-03-2005, 01:01 PM
  #47  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SixPak

but haven't they over-rated these things in the past?
They have severely underrated them too. My '03 Cobra put down 380 something rwhp bone stock. That's around 440 at the crank.
Old 04-03-2005, 10:33 PM
  #48  
Teching In
 
JustaStockHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eaton, CO/Lubbock, TX
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those cars are still horrible looking. It was a good idea... but exicuted wrong.
Old 04-03-2005, 10:50 PM
  #49  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
psykoTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rustylt1
What..better lookin than a 68 "Bullitt" or 70 Mach 1?
A Chevelle

Originally Posted by unit213
They have severely underrated them too. My '03 Cobra put down 380 something rwhp bone stock. That's around 440 at the crank.
Dang....
Old 04-03-2005, 10:50 PM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
psykoTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oh, I like the car BTW, looks better than a GT.

Something quick to say- I pulled up next to a new stang GT today. As I drove by it I could see a guy, his wife, and kid in the back. The car looked real clean. I was sitting in traffic a little ways down the road, and the stang was creaping up beside in traffic, as he creaped by, I could see his kid in the back straining to see my car as they passed

Last edited by psykoTA; 04-03-2005 at 10:56 PM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 AM.