Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

when mustangs lose

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2005, 09:36 PM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
1bdbrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,933
Received 46 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by unit213
Mustangs are NOT sports cars...neither are f-bodies.
they arent muscle cars either. never have been and never will be.
Old 05-16-2005, 02:38 PM
  #42  
TECH Enthusiast
 
bottlefed5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kennedale TX
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1bdbrd
dude, stock for stock they are faster than a stock 5.0 fox???

and that was a pretty entertaining video. nice find.
Dude, stock for stock, and 4.6 GT Auto Vert is not faster than a stock Fox.
Old 05-16-2005, 10:32 PM
  #43  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
02ls1ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tomaSS
And you're proud of that kill, because......................................? I'm sorry but that was weak.
i agree with ^ that vid sucked!
Old 05-16-2005, 11:52 PM
  #44  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
1bdbrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,933
Received 46 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bottlefed5.0
Dude, stock for stock, and 4.6 GT Auto Vert is not faster than a stock Fox.
i did a quicky google search but didnt find times for exactly an a4 4.6 gt vert and an a4 5.0 gt vert but i did find just general times (didnt specify drivetrain type). they all had the 4.6 at around 14.1 and the fox was anywhere from 14.9-16.5 (wow!). i dont look for the 1/4 mile times to favor a fox vert rather than a 4.6 vert. and FWIW im talking about the newer 99+ 4.6. not the anemic mid 90s 4.6...

*EDIT* found some...

www.car-stats.com click find stats. choose ford (duh). scroll down to mustang gt (convert). and then click on the 01 and the 93.

01 ran 14.6@96 and the fox ran 16.1 at an unknown speed. its probably between 85-90 at the very most. i race many verts in my L98 back when it was trapping low 90s and even on the highway i put good distances on them.

Last edited by 1bdbrd; 05-17-2005 at 12:01 AM.
Old 05-17-2005, 03:01 PM
  #45  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Venkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Not Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

oh my god guys...

GTP owned a pony car, i found it funny, move on.
Old 05-17-2005, 04:06 PM
  #46  
TECH Enthusiast
 
bottlefed5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kennedale TX
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I admit it, I was wrong. I guess I am just used to never loosing in my Fox. But I am impressed that you took the time to prove me wrong.

Originally Posted by 1bdbrd
i did a quicky google search but didnt find times for exactly an a4 4.6 gt vert and an a4 5.0 gt vert but i did find just general times (didnt specify drivetrain type). they all had the 4.6 at around 14.1 and the fox was anywhere from 14.9-16.5 (wow!). i dont look for the 1/4 mile times to favor a fox vert rather than a 4.6 vert. and FWIW im talking about the newer 99+ 4.6. not the anemic mid 90s 4.6...

*EDIT* found some...

www.car-stats.com click find stats. choose ford (duh). scroll down to mustang gt (convert). and then click on the 01 and the 93.

01 ran 14.6@96 and the fox ran 16.1 at an unknown speed. its probably between 85-90 at the very most. i race many verts in my L98 back when it was trapping low 90s and even on the highway i put good distances on them.
Old 05-17-2005, 08:11 PM
  #47  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
1bdbrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,933
Received 46 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bottlefed5.0
Well I admit it, I was wrong. I guess I am just used to never loosing in my Fox. But I am impressed that you took the time to prove me wrong.
its all good. i was bored as hell last night anyways.
Old 05-18-2005, 11:50 AM
  #48  
Teching In
 
JCosper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats funny right there, I dont care ya are dats funny!

and good kill for the GTP I might add.
Old 05-19-2005, 04:20 PM
  #49  
Staging Lane
 
RedLS1Iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i dont care what anybody says, i love to see Mustangs get owned by family sedans. good vid.
Old 05-30-2005, 01:08 AM
  #50  
TECH Apprentice
 
SSEUL8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Maybe not the fastest car to outrun, but I love what he said to him first. That was great. Makes me miss my car, when i could ask a guy in a mustang if he wanted me to show him how fast his car WASN'T.
Old 05-30-2005, 08:35 AM
  #51  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSEUL8R
Maybe not the fastest car to outrun, but I love what he said to him first. That was great. Makes me miss my car, when i could ask a guy in a mustang if he wanted me to show him how fast his car WASN'T.
Why don't I ever get dumbass people like this to roll up on me?
Old 05-30-2005, 08:39 AM
  #52  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1bdbrd
they arent muscle cars either. never have been and never will be.
You're right since muscle cars died in the 60's. Fbodies aren't sports cars either. Maybe you should read up on the definition of a sports car.
Old 05-30-2005, 11:26 AM
  #53  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
02ls1ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1bdbrd
dude, stock for stock they are faster than a 200k mile stock 5.0 fox???

and that was a pretty entertaining video. nice find.
Old 05-30-2005, 05:43 PM
  #54  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
transAm-98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA, Bay Area
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1bdbrd
dude, stock for stock they are faster than a stock 5.0 fox???

and that was a pretty entertaining video. nice find.
my friend has an 87 LX that ran a 13.8 with CAI and X-pipe on street tires. 5.0s are superior to modulars (minus new cobra's). my other friend has a 98 with gears and full exaust and he's still trying to get low 14's




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.