240sx/Trans-Am conversion=Weird
240sx/Trans-Am conversion=Weird 
11-10-2005, 12:15 AM
#6
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring / Sealy, TX
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yall are just now seeing that? LOL, that thing has haunted my computer screen for months now
why would you put a 455 iron boat anchor in that car vs an all aluminum turbo 4 cylinder that puts out twice the wheelhorsepower?
stupid body conversion yes to the extreme, but please know wtf your talking about or have a slight bit of a clue.
why would you put a 455 iron boat anchor in that car vs an all aluminum turbo 4 cylinder that puts out twice the wheelhorsepower?
stupid body conversion yes to the extreme, but please know wtf your talking about or have a slight bit of a clue.
11-10-2005, 12:48 AM
#7
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College Station/Kingwood, Texas
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Smokey and the Bandit style Trans-Ams (1977) had 6.6L 403s, not 455s. They made crap for power, and were heavy and slow.
And that 240 is ugly, but i would prolly have to at least check it out if i saw it in person.
And that 240 is ugly, but i would prolly have to at least check it out if i saw it in person.
Trending Topics
11-10-2005, 09:58 AM
#8
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It reminds me of a car my buddy had one time. It was a 1980's ford escort station wagon, with a 1991 mustatang lx front end. Even had suicide doors. We called it the "Muscort" Obviously. If only I had a picture.
