Flowmaster VS. the World...
Though you could get the electric thing, just seems like a waste of money to me.(borla is a waste to me, but it was on the car when I bought it, otherwise I'd probably bought magnaflow or something)
Back in the day, that's all you heard...If they spent half they time they do on designing mufflers than making advertisments...they have a badass muffler...but money talks, hp walks.
Back in the day, that's all you heard...If they spent half they time they do on designing mufflers than making advertisments...they have a badass muffler...but money talks, hp walks.
again, i don't think the extra 300-400 bucks for the higher end cat backs is really worth the 4 hp you pick up. we need proof... hard evidence.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
[IMG]
[/IMG] Be aware those justifying keeping the flowmaster cat back by stating you are going to go heads/cam or forced induction to make up for the power loss from the exhaust have to understand that couple hp loss on a stock car will turn into 10-12hp loss on a heads cam car or forced induction car. That could mean the difference between a 390rwhp car vs a 400rwhp car.
In the end regardless of the hp loss or gain its about how you want the car to sound. I catch flack for having a flowmaster on my car but I'm pleased with the sound it makes. My setup flows great and is super light weight and it only costed $90 its just a 1 chamber on my stock y pipe dumped with no turndown. I only like Flowmasters sound when they are really loud.
Car lost 5 rwhp on the dyno across the rpm band, and also ran about a tenth slower at the track. I put a cutout on it, and picked up 10 rwhp over stock and ran 1.4 tenths quicker at the track.
But it sounded good. That is, until I got rid of it for something better.




