Autotap Results
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 1
From: Lake Zurich, IL
Autotap Results OK, here's the results of my latest autotap log
WOT AVG TIMING: 23.5
WOT O2 AVG: 0.905
Does that look good for nitrous?
How about NA, am I running too rich for NA runs? Should I add more timing for NA?
WOT AVG TIMING: 23.5
WOT O2 AVG: 0.905
Does that look good for nitrous?
How about NA, am I running too rich for NA runs? Should I add more timing for NA?
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: CA
Re: Autotap Results </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by horist:
<strong>OK, here's the results of my latest autotap log
WOT AVG TIMING: 23.5
WOT O2 AVG: 0.905
Does that look good for nitrous?
How about NA, am I running too rich for NA runs? Should I add more timing for NA?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Did you ever correlate your O2 sensors with a real wideband O2 sensor from a dyno? 0.905V is not the same thing on all cars.
<strong>OK, here's the results of my latest autotap log
WOT AVG TIMING: 23.5
WOT O2 AVG: 0.905
Does that look good for nitrous?
How about NA, am I running too rich for NA runs? Should I add more timing for NA?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Did you ever correlate your O2 sensors with a real wideband O2 sensor from a dyno? 0.905V is not the same thing on all cars.
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 1
From: Lake Zurich, IL
Re: Autotap Results </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by akw408:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by horist:
<strong>OK, here's the results of my latest autotap log
WOT AVG TIMING: 23.5
WOT O2 AVG: 0.905
Does that look good for nitrous?
How about NA, am I running too rich for NA runs? Should I add more timing for NA?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Did you ever correlate your O2 sensors with a real wideband O2 sensor from a dyno? 0.905V is not the same thing on all cars.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes, I know that autotap results are not the same as getting my car dynoed w/wideband, and I AM getting my car dyoned with wideband on the 23rd, was just curious if the atap results looked good.... gotta start somewhere <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by horist:
<strong>OK, here's the results of my latest autotap log
WOT AVG TIMING: 23.5
WOT O2 AVG: 0.905
Does that look good for nitrous?
How about NA, am I running too rich for NA runs? Should I add more timing for NA?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Did you ever correlate your O2 sensors with a real wideband O2 sensor from a dyno? 0.905V is not the same thing on all cars.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes, I know that autotap results are not the same as getting my car dynoed w/wideband, and I AM getting my car dyoned with wideband on the 23rd, was just curious if the atap results looked good.... gotta start somewhere <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: CA
Re: Autotap Results </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by horist:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by akw408:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by horist:
<strong>OK, here's the results of my latest autotap log
WOT AVG TIMING: 23.5
WOT O2 AVG: 0.905
Does that look good for nitrous?
How about NA, am I running too rich for NA runs? Should I add more timing for NA?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Did you ever correlate your O2 sensors with a real wideband O2 sensor from a dyno? 0.905V is not the same thing on all cars.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes, I know that autotap results are not the same as getting my car dynoed w/wideband, and I AM getting my car dyoned with wideband on the 23rd, was just curious if the atap results looked good.... gotta start somewhere <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Good, when you dyno with the WB O2, autotap at the same time and you can kind of "calibrate" your O2 sensor with a real WB O2 sensor. The O2 sensors on your car are reasonably accurate, but they can all be alittle different. To be safe, I'd say 0.92V would be better.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by akw408:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by horist:
<strong>OK, here's the results of my latest autotap log
WOT AVG TIMING: 23.5
WOT O2 AVG: 0.905
Does that look good for nitrous?
How about NA, am I running too rich for NA runs? Should I add more timing for NA?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Did you ever correlate your O2 sensors with a real wideband O2 sensor from a dyno? 0.905V is not the same thing on all cars.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes, I know that autotap results are not the same as getting my car dynoed w/wideband, and I AM getting my car dyoned with wideband on the 23rd, was just curious if the atap results looked good.... gotta start somewhere <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Good, when you dyno with the WB O2, autotap at the same time and you can kind of "calibrate" your O2 sensor with a real WB O2 sensor. The O2 sensors on your car are reasonably accurate, but they can all be alittle different. To be safe, I'd say 0.92V would be better.