Nozzle behind TB???
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: The Woodlands, TX
Nozzle behind TB??? Has anyone actually placed a Nozzle behind the TB of our cars? This could definatly make it easy to hide a wet kit if it could be done. My only concern would be the nitrous not getting evenly distributed to all the cylinders.
Any comments or Ideas?
Any comments or Ideas?
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: The Woodlands, TX
Re: Nozzle behind TB??? That is kind of what I was afraid of as well, my thoughts were to run the nitrous lines under the intake and put the nozzle right behind the TB.
Anyone else have any comments or ideas?
Anyone else have any comments or ideas?
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 0
From: Iowa :-/~
Re: Nozzle behind TB??? The same as Ryan says. You would have uneven distribution and not get a good benefit out of the nitrous. It would work but the differnt cylenders would have diffent stresses on them.
Teching In
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: NRH Texas
Re: Nozzle behind TB??? ive always wanted to do this:
have an egr intake, get it deleted from the computer, run the lines up through it, and spray from that hole. its alot of work, but i think it would be pimp to hide a wet kit like that. so whose gonna do it!? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
have an egr intake, get it deleted from the computer, run the lines up through it, and spray from that hole. its alot of work, but i think it would be pimp to hide a wet kit like that. so whose gonna do it!? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
SSU Moderator
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Re: Nozzle behind TB??? </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Bad Habit Bird:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 2000 Camaro SS:
<strong>The same as Ryan says. You would have uneven distribution and not get a good benefit out of the nitrous. It would work but the differnt cylenders would have diffent stresses on them.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Very true, I know of people who turn a dry nozzle away from the maf so it doesnt hit the maf directly, What if you turned the nozzle toward the TB in this situation? The motor would suck the nitrous and fuel back into the intake wouldnt it or would the spray make it all the way to the maf before it got pulled back into the motor?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">that may work. like i said, you'd be plenty hidden if you loom the hoses well and threw the nozzle under the bellows. you'd just need a fitting welded to the back-side of the rail to hide the fuel side, and of course hide your sol.'s and use NX's tps switch.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 2000 Camaro SS:
<strong>The same as Ryan says. You would have uneven distribution and not get a good benefit out of the nitrous. It would work but the differnt cylenders would have diffent stresses on them.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Very true, I know of people who turn a dry nozzle away from the maf so it doesnt hit the maf directly, What if you turned the nozzle toward the TB in this situation? The motor would suck the nitrous and fuel back into the intake wouldnt it or would the spray make it all the way to the maf before it got pulled back into the motor?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">that may work. like i said, you'd be plenty hidden if you loom the hoses well and threw the nozzle under the bellows. you'd just need a fitting welded to the back-side of the rail to hide the fuel side, and of course hide your sol.'s and use NX's tps switch.
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: The Woodlands, TX
Re: Nozzle behind TB??? </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 2000 Camaro SS:
<strong>The same as Ryan says. You would have uneven distribution and not get a good benefit out of the nitrous. It would work but the differnt cylenders would have diffent stresses on them.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Very true, I know of people who turn a dry nozzle away from the maf so it doesnt hit the maf directly, What if you turned the nozzle toward the TB in this situation? The motor would suck the nitrous and fuel back into the intake wouldnt it or would the spray make it all the way to the maf before it got pulled back into the motor?
<strong>The same as Ryan says. You would have uneven distribution and not get a good benefit out of the nitrous. It would work but the differnt cylenders would have diffent stresses on them.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Very true, I know of people who turn a dry nozzle away from the maf so it doesnt hit the maf directly, What if you turned the nozzle toward the TB in this situation? The motor would suck the nitrous and fuel back into the intake wouldnt it or would the spray make it all the way to the maf before it got pulled back into the motor?
