Dyno w/ Cold Fusion Kit
07-31-2004, 03:55 PM
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
91 rwhp on a 125 shot is kinda week. i gained that from my 100 nx shot off the maf kit. no flames intended but i guess you get what you pay for. take it to the track and see what it does.
07-31-2004, 04:17 PM
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I like NX but my NXL kit is not putting down the power either. I am guessing about 60ish HP on a 120 shot and I sure as hell paid a lot for it!! Should have gotten a MAF kit and been done with it.
07-31-2004, 04:19 PM
#5
Originally Posted by algws6
91 rwhp on a 125 shot is kinda week. i gained that from my 100 nx shot off the maf kit. no flames intended but i guess you get what you pay for. take it to the track and see what it does.
[Rant]
Statements like that really chap my ***. Guess what guys NITROUS IS NITROUS. End of story. The only place that one company is better than another is Quality/Reliability.
Nitrous Power gains are ONLY a factor of Three things:
Air fuel ratio
Nitrous bottle pressure
Jet Size
Period. End of story.
The only reason people get different numbers is one of the above. Some companies rate thier jets smaller than they actually are. Some rate the power of the shot at the rear wheels, some at the fly wheel.
Nitrous is Nitrous.
Ryan K.
[/Rant]
07-31-2004, 04:27 PM
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ryan Karasek
[Rant]
Statements like that really chap my ***. Guess what guys NITROUS IS NITROUS. End of story. The only place that one company is better than another is Quality/Reliability.
Nitrous Power gains are ONLY a factor of Three things:
Air fuel ratio
Nitrous bottle pressure
Jet Size
Period. End of story.
The only reason people get different numbers is one of the above. Some companies rate thier jets smaller than they actually are. Some rate the power of the shot at the rear wheels, some at the fly wheel.
Nitrous is Nitrous.
Ryan K.
[/Rant]
Statements like that really chap my ***. Guess what guys NITROUS IS NITROUS. End of story. The only place that one company is better than another is Quality/Reliability.
Nitrous Power gains are ONLY a factor of Three things:
Air fuel ratio
Nitrous bottle pressure
Jet Size
Period. End of story.
The only reason people get different numbers is one of the above. Some companies rate thier jets smaller than they actually are. Some rate the power of the shot at the rear wheels, some at the fly wheel.
Nitrous is Nitrous.
Ryan K.
[/Rant]
07-31-2004, 06:41 PM
#7
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i understand what your saying but gaining 91 rwhp off of a 125 shot is not right. if this is the case why not just call it a 100 shot? if your *** is that chapped might i recomend bathing.
Trending Topics
07-31-2004, 07:13 PM
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
100. i agree nitrous is nitrous however some kits have better atomization than others which also varies in the hp produced. why doesn't cold fusion post how they rate their kits? like i stated before no flames intended.
07-31-2004, 08:20 PM
#10
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just got back from the track and sprayed at about 60 feet out so i would not break her loose. best run was 12.081 @ 118.76mph (1.89 / 60ft)
the HP increase of 91 in the sig had me confused as well and will look , but the air was much much more humid and hot between the two dynos.. (May compared to late August in SA)
PS: was about 94F between 4 and 7PM at SAR in Marion
am happy regardless
the HP increase of 91 in the sig had me confused as well and will look , but the air was much much more humid and hot between the two dynos.. (May compared to late August in SA)
PS: was about 94F between 4 and 7PM at SAR in Marion
am happy regardless
Originally Posted by algws6
91 rwhp on a 125 shot is kinda week. i gained that from my 100 nx shot off the maf kit. no flames intended but i guess you get what you pay for. take it to the track and see what it does.
Last edited by Cokeroker; 07-31-2004 at 08:59 PM.
10-17-2004, 11:20 PM
#12
When nitro companies make their sistem most of them was based on a complete factory car with no mods at all.The motor is an air pump and if you put some bolt ons a car it going to affect the results on the nitro sistem.That's why i think when you modify a car the only way to know how much HP you inject to it with NOS is with a Dyno run.If put bolt ons , the motor going to be more efficient N/a so with NOS going to be hit less with a 100HP jets or whatever because those number are based on teory but for real you going to get HP true the motor.Just my .02.
10-17-2004, 11:35 PM
#13
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Port Richey
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys need to completey forget factory ratings and stop judging kits by that. As said above it kind of chaps my *** too. Its rediculous. Install the kit...start with the small jets...get the AF right..and work your way up to your desired RWHP level maintaining good AF ratio.
Kit sounds like it works great! Want more HP...pill it up...its as simple as that.
Do you guys really think that if one kit calls a set of jets a 125 shot (that get 95 at the wheels) and another kit calls a set of jets a 125 shot (that gets 130 to the wheels) that they are flowing the same amount of nitrous and fuel?
Atomization is a good thing...but most nozzles on the market today work great and I dont believe one is signifacantly better than the next by a large margin. Atleast not to the tune of 35-40 hp at equal flow of nitrous and fuel.
Kit sounds like it works great! Want more HP...pill it up...its as simple as that.
Do you guys really think that if one kit calls a set of jets a 125 shot (that get 95 at the wheels) and another kit calls a set of jets a 125 shot (that gets 130 to the wheels) that they are flowing the same amount of nitrous and fuel?
Atomization is a good thing...but most nozzles on the market today work great and I dont believe one is signifacantly better than the next by a large margin. Atleast not to the tune of 35-40 hp at equal flow of nitrous and fuel.
10-18-2004, 12:06 AM
#14
10 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Baton Rouge,LA
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by algws6
100. i agree nitrous is nitrous however some kits have better atomization than others which also varies in the hp produced. why doesn't cold fusion post how they rate their kits? like i stated before no flames intended.
10-18-2004, 11:56 AM
#15
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: StreetRacing Capital, NY
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cokeroker
just got back from the track and sprayed at about 60 feet out so i would not break her loose. best run was 12.081 @ 118.76mph (1.89 / 60ft)
PS: was about 94F between 4 and 7PM at SAR in Marion
am happy regardless
PS: was about 94F between 4 and 7PM at SAR in Marion
am happy regardless
10-20-2004, 02:13 AM
#16
Originally Posted by KillaCoupe
no trying to be rude but you should be too happy with that ET...your car on motor should run 12.30s no problem on the spray you have over 400hp..i dunno what tires you were on but if you gunna use nitrous you really gota shoot it from the start...if you hook on the spray from the start an you can get that 60ft to atleast 1.60 or better you will be well into the 11's....remember every .10(tenth) off your 60ft is 2 tenths off you ET...do the math an you will be happier if you spray from the start...again unless you didnt have slicks or drag radials atleast mph is there but im all about ET
I agree with you 100%
