Limit on stock injectors
Well the experiment is finally done and I don't have to worry about it anymore.
It turns out that the stock injectors on the 1998 C5 really don't do anything past 100% duty cycle. The DC's and PW's reported are accurate, and the actual AFR does slowly start going lean after 100% DC as the RPM continues to climb & DC increases further past 100%.
After seeing it happen I can see how easy it is to be fooled by the wideband data. It would've been plainly obvious in an M6 equipped car because the RPM would be in a high range for most of a test run.
The highway geared A4 that I tested is just the opposite. The RPM stays low for most of the run, and in fact in 3rd gear stays between 4000 and 4500 RPM for the entire last 1/8 mile of a run. On the bottle the high RPM's flash by rather quickly with a 200hp shot so there is little time to register a slight lean condition that is only momentary. It does show on the wideband but looked like a hiccup and was so small as to be ignored. Most of the run on the wideband was well down in the 10:1 AFR so there seemed little to worry about.
In actuality as the RPM climbs slowly (NA) at the end of second gear, there is time to clearly see an upward trend with the AFR after 100% reported DC. With the injectors static & working like a carburetor, there is still no evidence of a massive lean conditon. As RPM increases the need for fuel increases, yet the need for fuel per cycle gets smaller to an extent too cancelling part of the fuel deficit. The result is a smooth rise in AFR.
Here's the data:
RPM----DC-----PW-----AFR
5150--99%--20.850---10.89
5332-101%--21.232---11.16
5476-103%--21.582---11.30
5639-106%--21.963---11.42
6109-108%--23.013---11.63
I forced a commanded 10.75 - 10.61 AFR for the testing to see how much was left in the injectors.
At the lower RPM there is quite a bit left to easily drop down in the 9:1 AFR range or a little lower. In fact 90% of my test run averages about 10.97 AFR and only leaning out in very small areas where the RPM is the highest.
It's much more dependant on RPM than anything, which is why this C5 was able to digest a 200hp shot of N2O without a problem and put up 11.0 @127 MPH with stock fuel system/injectors and still have room left.
Conclusion: A highway geared A4 car that keeps the RPM down can get away with murder with stock injectors. 500 - 550hp is a piece of cake as long as you don't need to spin high RPM to make it... and the bottle don't need to do that.
If you have a M6 car that makes its power higher in the RPM range, then you're going to be sorry for not upgrading injectors before you put the bottle to it.
I said I would do the experiment and I did it. It all makes sense now, and there isn't any real trickery or mystery involved at all... happy ending.
Well the experiment is finally done and I don't have to worry about it anymore.
It turns out that the stock injectors on the 1998 C5 really don't do anything past 100% duty cycle. The DC's and PW's reported are accurate, and the actual AFR does slowly start going lean after 100% DC as the RPM continues to climb & DC increases further past 100%.
After seeing it happen I can see how easy it is to be fooled by the wideband data. It would've been plainly obvious in an M6 equipped car because the RPM would be in a high range for most of a test run.
The highway geared A4 that I tested is just the opposite. The RPM stays low for most of the run, and in fact in 3rd gear stays between 4000 and 4500 RPM for the entire last 1/8 mile of a run. On the bottle the high RPM's flash by rather quickly with a 200hp shot so there is little time to register a slight lean condition that is only momentary. It does show on the wideband but looked like a hiccup and was so small as to be ignored. Most of the run on the wideband was well down in the 10:1 AFR so there seemed little to worry about.
In actuality as the RPM climbs slowly (NA) at the end of second gear, there is time to clearly see an upward trend with the AFR after 100% reported DC. With the injectors static & working like a carburetor, there is still no evidence of a massive lean conditon. As RPM increases the need for fuel increases, yet the need for fuel per cycle gets smaller to an extent too cancelling part of the fuel deficit. The result is a smooth rise in AFR.
Here's the data:
RPM----DC-----PW-----AFR
5150--99%--20.850---10.89
5332-101%--21.232---11.16
5476-103%--21.582---11.30
5639-106%--21.963---11.42
6109-108%--23.013---11.63
I forced a commanded 10.75 - 10.61 AFR for the testing to see how much was left in the injectors.
At the lower RPM there is quite a bit left to easily drop down in the 9:1 AFR range or a little lower. In fact 90% of my test run averages about 10.97 AFR and only leaning out in very small areas where the RPM is the highest.
It's much more dependant on RPM than anything, which is why this C5 was able to digest a 200hp shot of N2O without a problem and put up 11.0 @127 MPH with stock fuel system/injectors and still have room left.
Conclusion: A highway geared A4 car that keeps the RPM down can get away with murder with stock injectors. 500 - 550hp is a piece of cake as long as you don't need to spin high RPM to make it... and the bottle don't need to do that.
If you have a M6 car that makes its power higher in the RPM range, then you're going to be sorry for not upgrading injectors before you put the bottle to it.
I said I would do the experiment and I did it. It all makes sense now, and there isn't any real trickery or mystery involved at all... happy ending.
Can I get away with 150hp shot without upgrading my fuel system?\
If I can't, what (as a minimum) do I have to change?
And if 150hp shot is too much, could I just spray like 100hp shot or maybe 125hp shot without upgrading the fuel system?
The reason I ask is because I don't want have to replace the fuel pump. However, If I had to replace the injectors...........I think that would be easier and more importantly cheaper (due to the labor of having to pull my fuel tank)
Your input is greatly appreciated.
i found where he said the vette was a 200 dry shot.
Can I get away with 150hp shot without upgrading my fuel system?\
Best Time to date: 11.883 @ 119mph w/ 1.7 60' 100% N/A
If you were all stock, then yes a 100hp DRY shot should be no problem for your M6.
Oh yes I was talking DRY system. (sorry I forget about the wet guys)
As long as you've got the pump upgrade, then you could add your 150hp as a WET system without a problem. I'm pretty brave and I wouldn't do it without the pump.
So it appears under certain conditions you could survive for a time. But under other conditions it could be a recipe for disaster.
So for everyone out there...even though under certain curcumstances you may be able to get away with alot more han previously thought....injector upgrades by the old rule of thumb are still a safe bet.
PS...I still dont worry about the 80% rule. but I do worry when getting close to 100% for a longer period.
Good stuff man.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If you were all stock, then yes a 100hp DRY shot should be no problem for your M6.
Oh yes I was talking DRY system. (sorry I forget about the wet guys)
As long as you've got the pump upgrade, then you could add your 150hp as a WET system without a problem. I'm pretty brave and I wouldn't do it without the pump.
Would I be able to get away with just changing out my injectors?
I'd start out with a just a 100hp shot at first and log the AFR with a wideband, and datalog the runs so you can get a good idea what your duty cycles are and how much room you have left.
That's really the best way, instead of guessing.
You will need a way to tune the PCM in order to manage a big dry shot anyway, and scanning some test runs just makes sense.
On the vette fuel pump, the stock Walbro is good to 550 and some take it above 600hp. The bad thing is having the return at the tank, this causes a slight pressure loss, so converting to regulator and return line at the rails is the ansewr and you will maintain a rock steady 58/60psi to redline. this pumps are actually very good. I am doing the mod above and adding a Kenny Bell Bap to be activated when spraying only. Jon, remember I said you could have my 28lb injectors, and if I remember correctly you were at 380hp, so a KB Bap would be a good idea as it can boost the stock pump upto 30% which will cover you for sure. you can set the pressure you want for spraying and this can overcome smaller or close to the limit injectors. how ya doing over there? see ya soon.
Robert
I have seen these type of questions come up a lot here.
Robert
On the vette fuel pump, the stock Walbro is good to 550 and some take it above 600hp. The bad thing is having the return at the tank, this causes a slight pressure loss, so converting to regulator and return line at the rails is the ansewr and you will maintain a rock steady 58/60psi to redline. this pumps are actually very good. I am doing the mod above and adding a Kenny Bell Bap to be activated when spraying only. Jon, remember I said you could have my 28lb injectors, and if I remember correctly you were at 380hp, so a KB Bap would be a good idea as it can boost the stock pump upto 30% which will cover you for sure. you can set the pressure you want for spraying and this can overcome smaller or close to the limit injectors. how ya doing over there? see ya soon.
Robert
I'm doing good, but they moved me from Germany to Turkey.
Oh well, it could be worse! Thanks for asking. How you been doing? I missMy car is trapping 119.50mph in the 1/4, so I would say my car has well over 400rwhp. I'm guessing around 420rwhp......What do you think with that mph?
Does the C5 Coupe have the walbro fuel pump stock? And I have some 28lb injectors from that LS6 intake I bought. When I get that intake on it should also add some more hp. Then with the 150hp shot, that would put me at around 550rwhp and way more torque.
So you think that the 28lber's will be alright combined with the KB Bap?(what is a KB Bap?)
Or should I buy bigger injectors? When I get home, I'm really gonna need you help a whole lot..........with istallation and picking out parts. I want to try and stay around $1500 dollars or so! We can talk more later.....
Thanks for your help Robert and I'm eagerly awaiting your 10 second run.
Should be pretty soon.....
http://www.kennebell.net/accessories...boostapump.htm
and here are a couple threads for insight,
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=739059
http://photos.strasser.us/gallery2/m...g2_itemId=7882
here is the math for upsizing injectors by increasing fuel pressure,
http://<a href="http://photos.strass...temId=7882</a>
and I have many more if ya want to read up.
Robert
http://www.kennebell.net/accessories...boostapump.htm
and here are a couple threads for insight,
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=739059
http://photos.strasser.us/gallery2/m...g2_itemId=7882
here is the math for upsizing injectors by increasing fuel pressure,
http://<a href="http://photos.strass...temId=7882</a>
and I have many more if ya want to read up.
Robert
So if I buy some bigger injectors ($200..?) and this boot a pump, I should have no issues spraying 150rwhp dryshot of nitrous?
If I can get this all done safely and effectively I should be able to run 10's!
I know you have a vast knowledge of nitrous and the safety equipment to run it, but I really want to run it as safely as possible.........even if it means spending a little extra money! IMO, it would be cheaper to purchase and install all the necessary safety equipment now, rather than trying to save a few bucks and blowing my engine down the road as a result!
Like mentioned earlier, we can work out these issues when I get home! I'm getting pretty excited about all this.


