Maf Vs Sd Tuning Debate
My guess is that unless your making huge HP & TQ #'s the only reason for any differences would be in the PCM tune its self. Not coming from removing the MAF. Just my .02 cents
Regards Glenn
Regards Glenn

If my A4 gets into the 12's that will be fine (yeah right!!).
Go the MAF's
I have seen these for the LS1!!.
It's easy done
You on ls1.com.au ?
I haven't actually made it to the track to see what it would run as it is now, I suspect proably mid/high 13's.
I've done the exhaust (ncl extractors), T/B, CAI, PCM tune, actually, I just fitted an 85mm MAF to see what difference (if any) that is going to make, should get it on the dyno in the next day or so.
But I can see I might need to get the LS6 manifold on, and it's done 75K, and it rattles, uses oil (not too much), so it's probably not the healthiest LS1 out there....perhaps last on the list is some 3.73's.
Yes I am on ls1.com.au, I have a different name on there, but this forum is much better, not as many ego's to overcome.
It's easy done
You on ls1.com.au ?
An A4 with a good converter, decent exhaust, pcm tuning and traction will run a 12 easily. My setup with stock diff gears, tune and a SS3800 converter ran 13.13 on street tyres with heaps of wheel spin. Good traction would have ensure a high 12 easily.I'm sure my new setup will see a high 11
http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/strip.html
All things being equal I think M/T's are better than Hoosier slicks.
Regards Glenn
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time




