Tuning out error codes: no message vs disable

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 16, 2010 | 04:04 PM

Lil'John

Thread Starter

Launching!

Joined: Sep 2009

Posts: 250

Likes: 3

Tuning out error codes: no message vs disable

Title basically states it.

I'm sure all the major tuning software are the same in terms of tuning out error codes. But to be specific, I'm using Jet DST software.

Let us use rear o2 sensors as an example. I'm not running them and I want to tune them out of the diagnostic related stuff.

Jet DST gives two methods:
1) You can enable and disable an error code.
2) If it is enabled, you can tune it to no error reporting.

So, what is the "best" method for tuning out error codes? Disable it? Or no error reporting?

Mar 16, 2010 | 04:07 PM

MUSTANGBRKR02

12 Second Club

iTrader: (91)

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 4,599

Likes: 5

From: Maine

Not sure on that one but on HPT I use "no error reported."

Mar 16, 2010 | 07:47 PM

WE TODD DID

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 1,627

Likes: 290

No error reported is what I would do.

Mar 17, 2010 | 10:35 PM

Lil'John

Thread Starter

Launching!

Joined: Sep 2009

Posts: 250

Likes: 3

Is there a reason to use the no message over disabling?

Mar 17, 2010 | 11:17 PM

JonCR96Z

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (33)

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 3,006

Likes: 19

From: Asheboro, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil'John

Is there a reason to use the no message over disabling?

When you still need it to function but just not set the light. Setting it to 'no error reported' is what needs to be done, regardless of the SES light, for most things.