E38/LSA/6L90 or E67/LSA/6L90 ?
07-14-2014, 07:05 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E38/LSA/6L90 or E67/LSA/6L90 ? Hi
Putting an LSA into a Range Rover Classic with a 6L90 with tu/td shifting and no BCM.
We want to run the E67 ECM however the easy way it seems is to run the E38.However easy is not always right.
There is very little info online regarding this.
My questions are:
1. What performance or reliability losses are there with running the E38 over the E67 on an LSA
2. What specifically can the E38 not do that the E67 can when used on an LSA?
3. Why do people run the E38 when the E67 is what GM intended to run the LSA?
Any help would be much appreciated
Putting an LSA into a Range Rover Classic with a 6L90 with tu/td shifting and no BCM.
We want to run the E67 ECM however the easy way it seems is to run the E38.However easy is not always right.
There is very little info online regarding this.
My questions are:
1. What performance or reliability losses are there with running the E38 over the E67 on an LSA
2. What specifically can the E38 not do that the E67 can when used on an LSA?
3. Why do people run the E38 when the E67 is what GM intended to run the LSA?
Any help would be much appreciated
