"Best" VCM Suite Version for MPVI
I am just getting started tuning and purchased a used MPVI. It came with a CD with VCM suite version 2.1.18, however I don't have a CD drive on my computer so I downloaded the oldest non-beta verion of VCM suite I could find (2.24.686) from a fellow member. My MPVI is currently on 116 firmware. I know I don't want to go past VCM suite version 4.0.x as my research shows that anything newer than that will update my firmware to 121 which worst case could brick my MPVI or lose some features and lower the resale value of the interface.
Being brand new to tuning I am trying to learn as much as I can from youtube tutorials. Some things that seem to stand out so far is my channel list/table display looks quite different, I can't seem to search for PIDs (and couldn't find the closed loop enabled PID), I can't tell what a "broadcast parameter" is, and the histogram layout in scanner looks a bit different. The only thing I have read regarding a benefit of VCM version 2.24.x is that you can potentially change the (hexadecimal?) file to change parameters that are not supported by HP tuners. I am not very techy and doubt that I would ever use that "benefit." Also I can't open files from HPTs repository as it states I need a newer version.
With that being said, am I missing out on any features in the 3.x or 4.0.x versions of VCM suite? I am just looking to tune my father's car (Hot cam, LT's, Fast 92, GM 85mm MAF...) and touch up the tune on my car (H/C/I) using an AEM X series 30-0300 wideband. I have read that there can be issues reading/writing tunes using different versions of VCM suite, so I want to choose one version and stick with it. I appreciate any recommendations!
Version 4.4.2 is rumored to be the one that will force firmware update to v121 on the MPVI device as far as I could see, I think that's right. If firmware update occurs, you won't have access to older versions of software that are able to (I guess) do Diesel stuff that EPA doesn't like. I don't do diesel stuff so I can't verify that but am incredibly annoyed that this secret update occurred.
I sorta standardized myself on version 4.2, it did NOT push the firmware update on my device, but there was some little bug or something where I was having problems pushing the config to the MPVI device for standalone logging when you push the button on the MPVI device with no laptop connected (pro version), I think I couldn't get a certain PID to be monitored that way or something with 4.2, don't really remember. But I believe I downgraded to the last version just before that if I recall, so that's probably the one you want.. I will be using that one forever on my current cars as it seemed stable.
Next new car I tune where I need a license I will be starting with a fresh MPVI2 because I don't trust HPT to not break my existing solution. I just don't trust them now and don't trust letting my HPT software interact with the Internet. If they were willing to break the Diesel options with a secret update they'd certainly break, say, rear O2 deletion or something else with another update. Also, if your MPVI device breaks, don't expect them to repair and send it back. Google that, nobody ever gets an MPVI back for repair. It's always swapped with an MPVI2 somehow, your licenses get transferred.
Hit youtube and search for Benchworkx Garage and HP Tuners Rollback for more details. Love the product, it's the best solution out there. I just hate the company now.
Last edited by mk3cn4; May 11, 2022 at 03:04 PM.
Anyway, if you use older rev's and try to help someone and theirs was read with a newer rev, you can't help. Probably not a big deal.
I'm with mk3cn4, i no longer even trust them to resync my MPVI1 to save the license info.........
Although adding credits hasn't been an issue.
I've been reading the old threads on hpt forum for the VCM 3.0 and 3.2 releases. 3.2 seemed to go over much smoother. Most of the complaints were people who had math and tables set up in 2.24 whicu didn't carry over in 3.2 as well as just having to get used to the layout. I have no experience with the program, nor do I have any funcstions set upbso neither concern seem to apply to my situation. I will read through 3.4, 3.6, and 4.0 as time allows.
I also asked a similar question over on the hpt forum and Bill didn't even push updating which surprised me. He said not much for GM gen 3 has been added in the past 10 years, so I wouldn't be missing out on much parameter wise stcking with 2.24.
Also agree on the trust comments. I had watched about half that youtube video, thats where I got to not go past version 4.0 to be safe. I've got my new never used MPVI pro from 2007 with 8 credits which is more than I should ever need. Just need to pick a version, stick with it, and stay offline.
From my research VCM suite version 3.6.26 appeared to be pretty "stable" with minimal complaints. So I have downloaded that, set up a few graphs, and plan to try some data logging as soon as I get everything to get my new wideband installed.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Everyone is ALL FOR them protecting their IP. Me included. Love the product. Would hate to see some hacker/company steal their IP and put them out of business. As bad as I dislike and distrust the company, I will ABSOLUTELY be buying the product again on a future car most likely, because it's the best.
The problem is that they "protected their IP" in a super greedy underhanded way that screwed a lot of legit paying customers pretty badly, and now many of us won't trust them ever again.
All HPT had to do was list it in the release notes, or make it known before irreversibly secretly modifying the firmware in the MPVI1 that they were going to do this and I'd be OK with it.
If a future update removes the ability for you to delete rear O2 sensors, I'll be bringing this thread back from the dead and do the "I told you so". I'll still be tuning my 2 existing cars with my "update blocked" MPVI1-PRO however.
And on my next car I'll get a new MPVI2 and get it "standardized" for that car and will stop updates on it too (as long as their design allows me to do so in the future). That's the only way in my opinion to guarantee I can keep FEATURES I PAID FOR.
LATE EDIT: For the benefit of those who don't watch the video, the working theory is that HPT did this secret firmware "fix" is solely because a pirate version got out and was floating around. Nothing more. Their reputation in other business areas like licensing is evidence they are certainly capable of this type of underhanded tactic, and nobody has ever even hinted this is related to EPA or gov't or anything. Also, the firmware upgrade blocks versions right near the line of the pirated version allegedly based on the videos I've seen. Decide for yourself, but my opinion is they fundamentally screwed their customers in secret to block a pirate version.
Last edited by mk3cn4; Oct 22, 2022 at 09:08 AM.
Everyone is ALL FOR them protecting their IP. Me included. Love the product. Would hate to see some hacker/company steal their IP and put them out of business. As bad as I dislike and distrust the company, I will ABSOLUTELY be buying the product again on a future car most likely, because it's the best.
The problem is that they "protected their IP" in a super greedy underhanded way that screwed a lot of legit paying customers pretty badly, and now many of us won't trust them ever again.
You must not tune diesels. I don't either. But established customers who do (for legal reasons, like in boats and offroad tractors etc) have had FUNCTIONALITY secretly removed that they PAID FOR and were RELYING ON for their business or hobby.
All HPT had to do was list it in the release notes, or make it known before irreversibly secretly modifying the firmware in the MPVI1 that they were going to do this and I'd be OK with it.
If a future update removes the ability for you to delete rear O2 sensors, I'll be bringing this thread back from the dead and do the "I told you so". I'll still be tuning my 2 existing cars with my "update blocked" MPVI1-PRO however.
And on my next car I'll get a new MPVI2 and get it "standardized" for that car and will stop updates on it too (as long as their design allows me to do so in the future). That's the only way in my opinion to guarantee I can keep FEATURES I PAID FOR.
Everyone is ALL FOR them protecting their IP. Me included. Love the product. Would hate to see some hacker/company steal their IP and put them out of business. As bad as I dislike and distrust the company, I will ABSOLUTELY be buying the product again on a future car most likely, because it's the best.
The problem is that they "protected their IP" in a super greedy underhanded way that screwed a lot of legit paying customers pretty badly, and now many of us won't trust them ever again.
You must not tune diesels. I don't either. But established customers who do (for legal reasons, like in boats and offroad tractors etc) have had FUNCTIONALITY secretly removed that they PAID FOR and were RELYING ON for their business or hobby.
All HPT had to do was list it in the release notes, or make it known before irreversibly secretly modifying the firmware in the MPVI1 that they were going to do this and I'd be OK with it.
If a future update removes the ability for you to delete rear O2 sensors, I'll be bringing this thread back from the dead and do the "I told you so". I'll still be tuning my 2 existing cars with my "update blocked" MPVI1-PRO however.
And on my next car I'll get a new MPVI2 and get it "standardized" for that car and will stop updates on it too (as long as their design allows me to do so in the future). That's the only way in my opinion to guarantee I can keep FEATURES I PAID FOR.
I look at it differently, you bought a device that comes with free software and free software updates, you didnt pay for features IMO. Software updates have added all kinds of features to the editor and scanner over the years 99% of the time making it better for free. This not only applies to HPT but almost everything electronic now days including your cell phone.
I agree with NicD that HPT probably had their hands tied, I highly doubt they removed anything by choice.










