upgrade to LS1 Edit 1.05 issue
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: overland park, KS
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Anyone have trouble with the upgrade? I installed it, and when I run it it doesn't come up - it just consumes 100% of CPU. I can see it in my process list running, but not in the application list. Looks like the program is thrashing during the startup process. I'm on Win 2000 btw. 1.04 was working fine. Thanks!
<small>[ June 08, 2002, 04:46 PM: Message edited by: cliffkh ]</small>
<small>[ June 08, 2002, 04:46 PM: Message edited by: cliffkh ]</small>
#2
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Cliff,
Win 2000 is no problem. It was developed and tested on Win2K. When you installed the update, Did you put it in the default location. It has to be installed over a working copy of 1.0x.
Ken
Win 2000 is no problem. It was developed and tested on Win2K. When you installed the update, Did you put it in the default location. It has to be installed over a working copy of 1.0x.
Ken
#3
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: overland park, KS
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by KenK:
<strong>Cliff,
Win 2000 is no problem. It was developed and tested on Win2K. When you installed the update, Did you put it in the default location. It has to be installed over a working copy of 1.0x.
Ken</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ken - I did put it in the default location. Let me know if you have any ideas. Is there a log file with diagnostic messages? The install completes successfully - just when I go to run it it never actually comes up, but my laptop is running at 100% and I can see the processes in my process list. The programmer module has the same behavior too. THANKS!
<strong>Cliff,
Win 2000 is no problem. It was developed and tested on Win2K. When you installed the update, Did you put it in the default location. It has to be installed over a working copy of 1.0x.
Ken</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ken - I did put it in the default location. Let me know if you have any ideas. Is there a log file with diagnostic messages? The install completes successfully - just when I go to run it it never actually comes up, but my laptop is running at 100% and I can see the processes in my process list. The programmer module has the same behavior too. THANKS!