MAF tuning..
MAF tuning.. I got my VE table tuned by using SD and open loop in conjunction with the wideband and the VE A/F error histogram in HP Tuners. I have a Z06 maf that I'm trying to now tune. I logged the dynamic airflow as stated in the sticky for maf tuning. The numbers seemed about right because they're a little higher than the numbers in my stock maf table. Now when I turn the maf back on and keep the car in open loop to try and tune my maf the a/f goes pig rich to the high 10's and low 11's even when just cruising. Even if I plug the numbers in from the stock maf table it's real rich.
What's the reason behind this?
Is there maybe a difference in the resistance of a Z06 maf and the stock f-body that needs to be accounted for?
I guess I can tune by just lowering the maf table down until the a/f works but there seems to be something I'm missing.
Any thoughts?
What's the reason behind this?
Is there maybe a difference in the resistance of a Z06 maf and the stock f-body that needs to be accounted for?
I guess I can tune by just lowering the maf table down until the a/f works but there seems to be something I'm missing.
Any thoughts?
Staging Lane
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
You're not missing anything. Since you changed the VE table, there is no longer any rational linkage between it and the MAF table. Just use the MAF AFR Error to correct the existing MAF calibration table.
It simply needs to be calibrated, since you have the wideband interface you can go ahead and rework the table. once the ve and maf are calibrated your wideband should show exactly what your commanding in open loop.
Thanks for the responses, I didn't think I was missing anything. Back to tuning.
Yes it did but I removed it.
Originally Posted by ninobrn99
quick questions for ya off topic. did your maf come with a screen?
It still dosnt make sense that it goes this far rich. If he's got his MAF fail set to 0, but is still logging the MAF Hz and Dynamic Airflow in a histogram, Based on dynamic airflow, the numbers should get him close when he punches them into his MAF table.
Would the proportional fueling numbers make a difference in open loop - MAF? Would the overcorrection be caused by the larger injectors?
I guess at this point the only thing to do is use the MAF error histogram.
Would the proportional fueling numbers make a difference in open loop - MAF? Would the overcorrection be caused by the larger injectors?
I guess at this point the only thing to do is use the MAF error histogram.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
Would the proportional fueling numbers make a difference in open loop - MAF? Would the overcorrection be caused by the larger injectors?
I guess at this point the only thing to do is use the MAF error histogram.
I guess at this point the only thing to do is use the MAF error histogram.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by My90Iroc
Anyone? Anyone? I'm still way rich with the maf on and the MAF error table is telling me to take out a lot, to the point where I'd be in negative values if I listened to the histogram.
