Any experience tweaking PE for max tq?
Stock AFR's on C5's are rich to begin with but do follow a path of rich to richer in the 4400-4800 rpm range and then lean out again. The fews tunes that I have seen are pretty much flatlined @ 12.9:1 or so in PE.
Stock AFR's on C5's are rich to begin with but do follow a path of rich to richer in the 4400-4800 rpm range and then lean out again. The fews tunes that I have seen are pretty much flatlined @ 12.9:1 or so in PE.
I'm not saying that theres not optimal AFR's for differnt parts of the RPM band..
But have you considered that torque is a function of power? Alot of guys say something like XX most torque while XX makes most power.. Not possible.. If torque in that spot goes up, power goes up in that spot.
I set my PE in a simliar fashion. GM obviously does a similar setup as well for a reason.
I hope to get back to the dyno in September or October and play around with the different PE settings.
I set my PE in a simliar fashion. GM obviously does a similar setup as well for a reason.
I hope to get back to the dyno in September or October and play around with the different PE settings.
Trending Topics
i'm going to give yours a shot tomorrow and see how it responds
Last edited by dissonance; Aug 8, 2006 at 09:08 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
i'm going to give yours a shot tomorrow and see how it responds

Let me know how it goes; if I missed it, what car do you have...?
My car seemed a little more responsive at lower RPMs in PE but WOT was hard to tell… and my LC-1 is still off for warranty work so I’m not sure what the AFR was… I think the LC-1 will be back by this weekend and I might make it to the track to see what it does vs. my old setup.
What inspired you to change your PE modifier like this? This is one of 1st I have seen like this.






