Differences between LS2 and LS7 PCM
If there are differences, is there any advantage to using the LS7 PCM over the LS2? More features, better performance, etc.?
Thanks,
-ch
Last edited by hyperion; Feb 9, 2007 at 02:11 AM.

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
05 LS2 Vette used the E40, but there is no Z06 or LS7 in 05.

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
In terms of performance or capabilities, are there any advantages to one particular PCM?
-ch
Trending Topics

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Thanks again,
-ch
Thanks again,
-ch
For the time being the 99-02 has more going for it in simplcity. It can also independantly control a automatic transmission. The 99-02 can be used with really trick OS's like Efilives Os5. I'm sure it won't be too long before the can computers catch up.
-ch
05 LS2 Vette used the E40, but there is no Z06 or LS7 in 05.
Where 4 6 and 8 are the number of cylinders. Especially with newer stuff like VVT and DOD etc.
At least thats my recollection..
Plus with the new ve calculations boost is automatically handled and the ecm is faster so can do it on the fly without needing static ve tables etc and is more able to deal with the above stuff mentioned, perhaps even with direct injection like the solstice and the E67 ecm in it.
Thanks again,
-ch
Basically the main advantage of the newer PCMs is support for other applications running on the car. More crappy subsystems which you don't need unless you are retrofitting alot of stuff onto your project car! They don't really do a better job of running the engine.
Maybe you might want it because I mean seriously GM worked on our stuff 10 years ago. It is ancient. No one at GM even knows what the 2002 Camaro OS is.
The only performance advantage of the newer operating systems is floating point calculations: No 512.x grams/second limit on the MAF. That could be done on our older PCMs if someone had the time and knowledge of the hardware.







