Alignment specs or suggestions for lowered?
#1
Alignment specs or suggestions for lowered?
Just picked up my z from storage today and threw it on the alignment rack since the toe was obviously off, i found that the settings i had years ago has changed drastically. Looking for what is working for you, have adjusted the toe only today.
camber -1.5 -1.4
caster 4.2 - 4.4
toe .01 - .01
thrust angle (adj via adjustable panhard rod?) .18
thx...
camber -1.5 -1.4
caster 4.2 - 4.4
toe .01 - .01
thrust angle (adj via adjustable panhard rod?) .18
thx...
#2
I know you are glad to have it back!
Here are some posts that might help out:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=camber
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=camber
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=camber
And here's a great post on handling in general:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=camber
Let us know if you need anything...
Here are some posts that might help out:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=camber
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=camber
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=camber
And here's a great post on handling in general:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=camber
Let us know if you need anything...
#3
Originally Posted by Ronin98Z
Just picked up my z from storage today and threw it on the alignment rack since the toe was obviously off, i found that the settings i had years ago has changed drastically. Looking for what is working for you, have adjusted the toe only today.
camber -1.5 -1.4
caster 4.2 - 4.4
toe .01 - .01
thrust angle (adj via adjustable panhard rod?) .18
thx...
camber -1.5 -1.4
caster 4.2 - 4.4
toe .01 - .01
thrust angle (adj via adjustable panhard rod?) .18
thx...
#4
Thx for the links, will check it out.
Not sure what was the cause or how i got more neg. camber, initially had -1.0 on one side and -.8 on the other as that was all we could get, had a shop install the baer bump steer tie rod ends and changed the front struts years ago, even gave my print out sheet to get close to the same specs. I would think maybe as the tire wore down that it could increased neg camber readings. It would be interesing to put new tires on and see.
Originally Posted by Mojave
That is a pretty good amount of camber with stock upper control arms.
#5
Originally Posted by Ronin98Z
Thx for the links, will check it out.
Not sure what was the cause or how i got more neg. camber, initially had -1.0 on one side and -.8 on the other as that was all we could get, had a shop install the baer bump steer tie rod ends and changed the front struts years ago, even gave my print out sheet to get close to the same specs. I would think maybe as the tire wore down that it could increased neg camber readings. It would be interesing to put new tires on and see.
Not sure what was the cause or how i got more neg. camber, initially had -1.0 on one side and -.8 on the other as that was all we could get, had a shop install the baer bump steer tie rod ends and changed the front struts years ago, even gave my print out sheet to get close to the same specs. I would think maybe as the tire wore down that it could increased neg camber readings. It would be interesing to put new tires on and see.
#6
Not to post to another forum, but frrax is an incredible association of f-body autocross/road racers.
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=1231
I used this thread to get an idea of what I wanted my specs to be.
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=1231
I used this thread to get an idea of what I wanted my specs to be.
#7
Originally Posted by Rescue Ranger
Not to post to another forum, but frrax is an incredible association of f-body autocross/road racers.
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=1231
I used this thread to get an idea of what I wanted my specs to be.
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=1231
I used this thread to get an idea of what I wanted my specs to be.