Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

Maggied LS6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2016, 08:15 PM
  #21  
DMM
TECH Fanatic
 
DMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ls1drew
Enjoy it while it lasts. You're too lean, it's gonna go boom.
Old 03-24-2016, 08:37 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
jclayc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SC
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DMM
Enjoy it while it lasts. You're too lean, it's gonna go boom.
I don't know a lot but I thought SC engines could/should run a lower AFR number. From Magnuson "Each supercharger was finely tuned to a near-perfect 12:1 fuel/air ratio."
Old 03-24-2016, 09:21 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
TorchRedRob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: GA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jclayc
I don't know a lot but I thought SC engines could/should run a lower AFR number. From Magnuson "Each supercharger was finely tuned to a near-perfect 12:1 fuel/air ratio."
I'm no expert, but I have heard you want to be closer to 11:1 if you are still at the stock (high) static compression ratio in order to combat detonation.
Old 03-24-2016, 09:22 PM
  #24  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Whitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Smyrna, GA
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DMM
Enjoy it while it lasts. You're too lean, it's gonna go boom.
I know with boosted cars you generally want to run a richer mixture which I figure 12.3 would be good right? Or do you want it even lower than 12.3?
Old 03-24-2016, 11:21 PM
  #25  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

11.5-11.7 is a safe tune, 12.1 is where you make the highest numbers boosted...

Took that info off others baggerin on ls1tech.

Its really up to the end user, if they are happy with their afr then great.

I run 12.8 on my truck and 12.2 on my caddy.

Both are NA but one is 9.85 cr while the other is much higher...
Old 03-25-2016, 10:59 AM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Sssnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

STOCK V2s run between 11 and 11.5 on better pistons with oil squirters. It is all a matter of choice but I don't see the increased power being worth the risk on a daily driver. Besides a little margin for error is a good thing (commanded AFR is not always the same as actual AFR).


If you are going to meth then you have to account for the difference in stoich for meth. Stoich ratio for meth is around 5.5:1. MUCH different than the 14.7 for gas or 14.13 for E10.
Old 03-25-2016, 11:19 AM
  #27  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sssnake
STOCK V2s run between 11 and 11.5 on better pistons with oil squirters. It is all a matter of choice but I don't see the increased power being worth the risk on a daily driver. Besides a little margin for error is a good thing (commanded AFR is not always the same as actual AFR).


If you are going to meth then you have to account for the difference in stoich for meth. Stoich ratio for meth is around 5.5:1. MUCH different than the 14.7 for gas or 14.13 for E10.
You know every book i read states the commanded afr should reflect the actual afr.
Which means more time dialin in the maf and injector flow, but ppl arent that patient and take shortcuts...
Old 03-25-2016, 01:14 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Sssnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

You know every book i read states the commanded afr should reflect the actual afr.
Which means more time dialin in the maf and injector flow, but ppl arent that patient and take shortcuts...
The key word there is SHOULD. Go back and re-read those books and I am fairly certain they will tell you there is quite a bit of variability within the system that needs to be accounted for (at least all of mine do). Better yet, log a few cars at different times during the year (different temps, humidities, altitudes) and prove to me that they match with less than 1% variance. You can take all of the time in the world and you won't reach that goal. The VE tables and VVE equations are models of the expected airflow. ALL models contain inaccuracies and/or limitations in fidelity (as I have spent 20+ yrs modeling some of the most sophisticated systems in the world, I do consider myself an expert in the field of M&S). The MAF signal is fairly noisy itself and therefore cannot be trusted to produce 1% accuracy outside a very steady state conditions. Then there is the fuel system. How common is it for fuel pressure to drop at high demand. Pretty damn common. Our ECMs don't even measure fuel pressure. How about fuel temp. Several ECMs track it. Our ECMs don't. Do you test your gasoline every fill up. I bet not. What happens when you hit a bad tank of gas? SO if you feel comfortable being on the edge of detonation then have at it. But blindly suggesting it is VERY safe for others to do the same is asinine.

Now you will likely come back with some post harping on the arbitrary 1% value that I picked. As stated, it is arbitrary. How close does AFR need to be? It depends upon what your target is. This brings it all back to my point, go with a more tolerant setting and enjoy miles and miles of great performance. Go with a less tolerant setting and have a small error in the tune or with the engine and have fun rebuilding your engine.
Old 03-25-2016, 01:20 PM
  #29  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default



I said i got it off ls1tech where ppl are baggerin...

Try searchin the corvette forum...you will find what i am talkin about.

Old 03-27-2016, 06:47 PM
  #30  
DMM
TECH Fanatic
 
DMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Charles is the man when it comes to this. He's spent a lot of time on fueling and is pretty much the go to guy for fuel systems for our cars.

For an LS6 to be at 12.3 AFR at the top of its rev range on boost tells me there was probably no MAF tuning done, as the OE tune leans out at 6k RPM. This is what I normally see when the PE is manipulated in an attempt to get a desired AFR.

OP's car may run like this forever. Or, if he does a long 4th gear pull it might pop, which would be my concern.

I'd stick to second gear pulls for the time being, OP.
Old 03-27-2016, 09:15 PM
  #31  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Ls1drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So should I be concerned with the 12.3? Where should it be?
Old 03-27-2016, 10:49 PM
  #32  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Your tune is a little lean basically anything over 3500 RPM you should be below 12.0 around 11.5 to 11.7
Old 03-28-2016, 02:57 PM
  #33  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Ls1drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default




Old 03-28-2016, 02:59 PM
  #34  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Ls1drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Seems to just get above 12 up top.
Old 04-13-2016, 09:02 PM
  #35  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Ls1drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Question.... I have 60# fuel injectors and the Kenny bell adjustable boost a pump right now, could I go e85 with this?
Old 04-13-2016, 10:23 PM
  #36  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

No, you have to change the pump, and injectors to properly run e85.
Old 04-14-2016, 11:09 AM
  #37  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
1BADCTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ls1drew
Seems to just get above 12 up top.
So the meth would bring him right in line.
Old 04-14-2016, 12:40 PM
  #38  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

He needs to correct it, but yes it will help when it is workin. When the fluid runs out he will be right back at square one
Old 04-26-2016, 06:40 PM
  #39  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Ls1drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tuner agreed above 12 is too lean. He's gunna look at it Thursday. Thank you all for the feedback and information.
Old 05-08-2016, 09:11 PM
  #40  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Ls1drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tuner has the car showing low 11s all the way to redline. Feels like this may have cost me a couple hp, no big deal if it means a longer life for my motor. Turned the fans to come on at 185°. And got it running smoother down low buy putting a nitrous pill in the tube coming from the throttle body.

One thing I've noticed on occasion, with traction and stability off (press and hold for 5 sec), in first gear, under full acceleration (usually lots of tire spinning with this), the power will cut out like traction control is on. And then come right back. Maybe 1 out of 10 times. And it's been up around 5k or 6k rpm. Is this a tune issue? Belt slip? Idk what's going on... any ideas? This was noticed before the tuning adjustments were recently made.


Quick Reply: Maggied LS6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.