When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
All depends on the purpose. The classics can be more fun as garage queens/occasional weekend drivers (and more serviceable/sustainable at home by the private enthusiast as they age), while the modern cars usually do better in a daily driver environment and probably aren't something you'll want to deal with when they are 45-50+ years old.
Originally Posted by JCS30TH
half and half. Current drivetrain in classic body
For me, this would be the worst combo. I like old tech in an old car, and if I'm going to be forced to deal with modern tech and gadgets then I want all the weather resistance that comes along with a modern vehicle.
"It's harder to make an ugly car pretty than it is to make a slow car fast. You can't see fast when you look at a car but you can see beautiful. Whether falling in love all over again every time you look at your Camaro is worth giving up the niceties of modern technology is a question only you can answer."
I'd rather my 3rd Gen's than a 1st or 6th Camaro for the reason above. It's all about the style that I like not what someone else likes.
It's all about the style that I like not what someone else likes.
I agree. When it comes to hobbyists and their hobby-related vehicles, there is no such thing as an objectively better car overall. The "better" car is, was and always will be a subjective matter of preference based on various factors specific to the individual - period.
I considered buying a 1970 Chevelle, but I also wanted the modern tech for road trips and daily driving. While the newer variants are a lot more comfortable to drive, they can be a PITA when applying mods', e.g., computer modules, ECM's, servo drives, interlocks, etc. In the end, I went new school and accepted the limitations and concessions I've had to make.