Anyone else remove their SFCs?
#1
Anyone else remove their SFCs?
So I am in the middle of freshening up the old bird with new steering rack, wheels, tires, bushings, etc. and decided to remove the sub frame connectors because its used now as more of a cruiser and I don't race it anymore. They were definitely great for the car when I was drag racing but I removed them before a trip to Atlanta this past weekend to see how I would like it. Biggest change is the ride quality, even so that my wife asked what I changed because it was riding so much better. I feel like the SFCs were amplifying the bumps and transferring that into the cabin, which I assume is exactly what they were doing. I took a few hard corners with a little throttle and I feel the car has a good bit more yaw action but it was a good feeling, not like it was out of control just shifted a little more. Overall I am glad I removed them and I wanted to see if anyone else had the same experience as well as give some feedback for anyone on the fence.
For the record I have Strano's springs and Koni Str.t shocks that are still pretty much brand new but were on the car before I took the SFC's off. Only thing I changed at the same time was the steering rack and wheels, I just pulled the SFC's off while i had it in the air.
For the record I have Strano's springs and Koni Str.t shocks that are still pretty much brand new but were on the car before I took the SFC's off. Only thing I changed at the same time was the steering rack and wheels, I just pulled the SFC's off while i had it in the air.
#3
Squishy is not a word I would use to describe the ride I have now. I honestly feel like the corners I take hard now I have more control and less immediate release of traction if that makes sense. As in the car flexing a little is helping the tires stay grounded better.
#7
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (40)
I've seen this debate come about a few times. From my experience and opinion, those who feel "improvement" in handling from removing chassis stiffening components are usually band-aiding a lacking in other areas of the suspension balance and setup. Its the same in the drag racing side when guys say their 60' slowed down when the added an anti-roll bar. The car was only working without it due to coincidental inefficiency in the chassis.
Also, a subframe connector should not be viewed as an item directly related to handling. Its primary purpose is to strengthen the chassis against fatigue and long term wear issues.
Also, a subframe connector should not be viewed as an item directly related to handling. Its primary purpose is to strengthen the chassis against fatigue and long term wear issues.
__________________
Glenn ***
Sales Tech
www.bmrsuspension.com
813.986.9302
Find a Quality alignment shop near you!
Glenn ***
Sales Tech
www.bmrsuspension.com
813.986.9302
Find a Quality alignment shop near you!
Trending Topics
#8
Pontiacerator
iTrader: (12)
So I decided to remove the sub frame connectors because its used now as more of a cruiser and I don't race it anymore. They were definitely great for the car when I was drag racing but I removed them before a trip to Atlanta this past weekend to see how I would like it. Biggest change is the ride quality, even so that my wife asked what I changed because it was riding so much better. I feel like the SFCs were amplifying the bumps and transferring that into the cabin, which I assume is exactly what they were doing. I took a few hard corners with a little throttle and I feel the car has a good bit more yaw action but it was a good feeling, not like it was out of control just shifted a little more. Overall I am glad I removed them and I wanted to see if anyone else had the same experience as well as give some feedback for anyone on the fence.
When I was going to the dragstrip a lot, they really helped with the wrinkling I had had in my RR quarter. But I haven't been going to the strip for years now, and all I experience from them is the increased ride harshness - as you say, every little bump is jarring.
I haven't taken them off because they were welded on in a quality way. But I recently found a guy locally who says he can get them off. So I just might.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/suspensio...emel-easy.html
#9
I know all about the cars that have dimpled but most of them did a lot of drag racing, hence the reason I bought them in the first place. I haven't hit the strip in years and I don't plan on it so I'm not really worried about the dimples. I agree with Eric in the fact it isn't supposed to be related to strictly handling but it does relate because chassis flex vs none at all will make a car handle and ride differently. I know this is a hot topic for a lot of guys and most will think I'm crazy but I made this thread for those that are in the same boat wondering if the car would be a better all around driving car with or without them. I personally think the car handles, drives, and rides better without them. I still have them obviously and I was doing this for an experiment so this is the results.
RevGTO I read your thread a while back and that's what got me thinking about it again. I read a long time ago about Sam Strano's setup, who seems to know what he is talking about, and he was explaining why he didn't run them but I can't find that thread again. Anyway, if you feel like its what you are looking for then you sound like you are in the same boat I am in. Cut em out
RevGTO I read your thread a while back and that's what got me thinking about it again. I read a long time ago about Sam Strano's setup, who seems to know what he is talking about, and he was explaining why he didn't run them but I can't find that thread again. Anyway, if you feel like its what you are looking for then you sound like you are in the same boat I am in. Cut em out
#10
TECH Senior Member
edit: here is a good read:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/suspensio...bout-sfcs.html
#11
SFC's do absolutely nothing to prevent 1/4 pannel dimples, they don't even brace that far back... I have had 1/4 pannel dimples form AFTER installing 3pt weld in SFCs.
edit: here is a good read:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/suspensio...bout-sfcs.html
edit: here is a good read:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/suspensio...bout-sfcs.html
#12
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
In ESP class they were not allowed long ago. A few years ago the rules changed to allow them (not sure the year) but Sam as a national competitor certainly could not install them and be legal, back then in like 2006. Maybe he had additional reasons. Weight certainly is a factor for racing.
#13
In ESP class they were not allowed long ago. A few years ago the rules changed to allow them (not sure the year) but Sam as a national competitor certainly could not install them and be legal, back then in like 2006. Maybe he had additional reasons. Weight certainly is a factor for racing.
#16
11 Second Club
After putting solid motor mounts in a whole bunch of creaks/rattles started. Put the 3pt SFC in. Took care of about 90% of it.
It still had the stock motor then too. If I took them off now it would rattle like crazy I suspect. All personal preference.
It still had the stock motor then too. If I took them off now it would rattle like crazy I suspect. All personal preference.
#17
The quarter panel dimples are caused by wheel hop. Has nothing to do with chassis flex caused by lack of frame connectors. The huge quarters on these cars flop around like crazy when wheel hopped. I can’t find it now, but someone had put a camera on the car showing what was happening.
#19
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MPLS MN
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
when i first got my car it rocked like a boat over bumps & rail road tracks. after welded BMR sfc's no more rocking. you cant possibly tell me twisting metal is good for the body in the long run. i did add all 3 parts at the same time so im not sure which one fixed my wheel hop. (sfc ; lca's ; panhard). article may 2004 super chevy "ls1 dos & donts" claims the first thing you should do is sfc's.
Last edited by DANOZ28; 09-10-2018 at 09:24 AM.