Special Edition Vehicles Firehawk | SS | WS6 | Berger | Blackbird | Comp T/A

difference between T/A and WS6 T/A?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2009 | 02:29 PM
  #41  
mikey67's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default

difference between T/A and WS6 T/A?-trans-am-98-vette-vs.-ta-dyno-results.jpg
Old 03-11-2009 | 02:35 PM
  #42  
5301113's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Odessa TX
Default

Originally Posted by Frostbitten09
O ya here are the Real Specs, and YES EVERY CAR IS DIFFERENT SOME WILL HAVE MORE SOME WILL HAVE LESS, BUT THIS IS THE SPECS FROM THE FACTORY.

Horsepower (hp / kw @ rpm):


310 / 231 @ 5200
w/ WS6 Ram Air: 325 / 242 @ 5200


Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm):


340 / 461 @ 4000
w/ WS6 Ram Air: 350 / 475 @ 4000

NOW LETS HEAR THE EXCUSES
https://ls1tech.com/forums/new-ls1-o...questions.html

This is POST #10
OEM HP Ratings




THE FBODY IS UNDERATED, YES, YOU READ RIGHT. THOSE ADVERTISED NUMBERS THAT GM QUOTES ARE BULLSHIT. WHY GM UNDERTATED THE LS1 IN THE FBODY WE'LL NEVER KNOW FOR SURE BUT THE FACT IS THEY DID. AN LS1 IN THE FBODY WILL DYNO ANYWHERE FROM 270RWHP TO 320RWHP DEPENDING ON YEAR, TRANNY, AND OPTIONS (SS/'HAWK OR SLP OPTIONS).

I REPEAT AGAIN THE 98-02 CARS ARE UNDERATED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



PLEASE READ THE STICKIES
Old 03-11-2009 | 02:36 PM
  #43  
myk's Avatar
myk
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 13
From: Sun Diego
Default

Originally Posted by mikey67
Way to go, Mikeeeey....
Old 03-11-2009 | 03:21 PM
  #44  
Frostbitten09's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Gap, PA/Kutztown PA
Default

O ya here are the Real Specs, and YES EVERY CAR IS DIFFERENT SOME WILL HAVE MORE SOME WILL HAVE LESS, BUT THIS IS THE SPECS FROM THE FACTORY.

Horsepower (hp / kw @ rpm):


310 / 231 @ 5200
w/ WS6 Ram Air: 325 / 242 @ 5200


Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm):


340 / 461 @ 4000
w/ WS6 Ram Air: 350 / 475 @ 4000

NOW LETS HEAR THE EXCUSES
Old 03-11-2009 | 03:37 PM
  #45  
DVS99TRANS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 1
From: E City,NC & Newark,DE
Default

Yeah and the average birth weight of babies is what 7 lbs about. I bet all of us on this forum where born at 7 lbs on the dot right lol. Don't believe everything you read. Throwing up SAE engine #'s is pointless and can't use that for arguements sake?
Old 03-11-2009 | 03:58 PM
  #46  
myk's Avatar
myk
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 13
From: Sun Diego
Default

Originally Posted by Frostbitten09
O ya here are the Real Specs, and YES EVERY CAR IS DIFFERENT SOME WILL HAVE MORE SOME WILL HAVE LESS, BUT THIS IS THE SPECS FROM THE FACTORY.

Horsepower (hp / kw @ rpm):


310 / 231 @ 5200
w/ WS6 Ram Air: 325 / 242 @ 5200


Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm):


340 / 461 @ 4000
w/ WS6 Ram Air: 350 / 475 @ 4000

NOW LETS HEAR THE EXCUSES
Why would you post this stuff up twice?
Old 03-11-2009 | 04:28 PM
  #47  
7camaro7's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by LS1W66
No offense but Settlemire is an *** all he is is a Glorrified PR man.
And All LS1's 1997-2004 make approx 345-350 HP no matter what car they were installed in.
I was trying to agree with you on how they're at the same power levels but argue how you think the suspension is useless. And better suspension of SSs, ws6s, firehawks, or what ever don't handle better due to only bigger wheels and lower profile tires.

Sounds to me like Settlemire has a hater which is a good thing I have haters too

So what did Settlemire do, that was so bad, to you? You don't dislike him too much seeing that you drive an fbody.

Last edited by 7camaro7; 03-11-2009 at 05:00 PM.
Old 03-11-2009 | 05:12 PM
  #48  
Blk_Ws6's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
From: In my Science Lab .
Default

Originally Posted by LS1W66
OMG You actually believe the GM ratings, you are definetely a Noob.

If the standard cars only make 310 HP (305 `98-`00) at the flywheel why did my bone stock `98 M6 make 300 at the rear wheels ?
Because its a m6 horse power was better on those T/A IS NOT FASTER THAN A T/A WS6 .
Old 03-11-2009 | 05:56 PM
  #49  
LS1W66's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 4
From: St. Clair Shores Mi.
Default

Originally Posted by 7camaro7
I was trying to agree with you on how they're at the same power levels but argue how you think the suspension is useless. And better suspension of SSs, ws6s, firehawks, or what ever don't handle better due to only bigger wheels and lower profile tires.

Sounds to me like Settlemire has a hater which is a good thing I have haters too

So what did Settlemire do, that was so bad, to you? You don't dislike him too much seeing that you drive an fbody.
If you did a little more research then you may come to the conclusion that the Suspensions only real difference is the front swaybar size. The springs and shocks aren't enough to make a substantial difference.
And as for Settlemire all I can say is He has No Business calling himself the F-body Father considering he wasn't working for GM in 1966-67 when the cars were being introduced. And he's always been more of a marketing guy for the Camaro then for the Firebird. Not that GM did much F-body Marketing after 1999.

Originally Posted by Blk_Ws6
Because its a m6 horse power was better on those T/A IS NOT FASTER THAN A T/A WS6 .
If you figure about a 15% loss (for M6) then if I'm at 300 RWHP then the engine is making around 345 HP at the flywheel. So it's obvious the GM ratings are Bogus, But our friend frostbitten 09 hasn't figured that out yet.
And I agree All F-bodies are the same. But only until the mods start going on.
Old 03-11-2009 | 06:16 PM
  #50  
7camaro7's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by LS1W66
If you did a little more research then you may come to the conclusion that the Suspensions only real difference is the front swaybar size. The springs and shocks aren't enough to make a substantial difference.
And as for Settlemire all I can say is He has No Business calling himself the F-body Father considering he wasn't working for GM in 1966-67 when the cars were being introduced. And he's always been more of a marketing guy for the Camaro then for the Firebird. Not that GM did much F-body Marketing after 1999.
On my car, afaik, the front sway is all that was different on my SS, but I do think there is more to it seeing how my car has the FE4 code which is some jazz about high performance handling. I think the springs may be different but the shocks are the same unless they were upgraded to bilstiens.

Fact of the matter is the SS, ws6, firehawk, and so on do handle better than the other cars and its not just due to tires and wheels,,,... no matter who settlemire was working for back in '66 and '67.
Old 03-11-2009 | 06:34 PM
  #51  
LS1W66's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 4
From: St. Clair Shores Mi.
Default

Originally Posted by 7camaro7
On my car, afaik, the front sway is all that was different on my SS, but I do think there is more to it seeing how my car has the FE4 code which is some jazz about high performance handling. I think the springs may be different but the shocks are the same unless they were upgraded to bilstiens.

Fact of the matter is the SS, ws6, firehawk, and so on do handle better than the other cars and its not just due to tires and wheels,,,... no matter who settlemire was working for back in '66 and '67.
Settlemire was probably still in Highschool or College back then.

1996 thru early 2000 WS6 and SS's came with the 1LE springs 360# Front 130-180# Rear where as stock LS car springs were 292/114. In late 2000 GM cheaped out and removed the springs from the package. So in essence the later cars just had the 32mm F swaybar and the bigger wheels and rubber.

I've never seen dramatic enough skidpad differences between the two setups that would make me think that one was much better then the other.

The Billstien option was a different setup with Eibach Progressive rate springs and the aforementioned shocks. This was touted as a much better riding system with great road manners.

I personally have Strano Springs, Swaybars and Koni's which is a vast improvement over any of the factory stuff.
Old 03-11-2009 | 06:48 PM
  #52  
7camaro7's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by LS1W66
personally have Strano Springs, Swaybars and Koni's which is a vast improvement over any of the factory stuff.
nuff said I've got the strano setup on the sway bars and all I need to complete my full suspension is an adjustable panhard, springs, and shocks.

Strano knows his stuff.

AFA suspension goes on the stock ones I won't say there were big differences, but there is still a difference. HPwise, there was really not that big of a difference. It was so small that I would say it is negligable(sp?)

This is a fact though, an ls1 is an ls1. From 98-00 they used one cam and 01-02 they used a different one and put on an ls6 intake and supposedly better exhaust manifolds. No matter what F-body you had, in stock trim they all got this respectively depending on the years. No matter what

no matter who you are, lid and cat back don't do enough to brag about, unless it sounds good
Old 03-11-2009 | 06:54 PM
  #53  
LS1W66's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 4
From: St. Clair Shores Mi.
Default

Agreed

IMO, At the end of the day if it puts a smile on your face then that's all that matters.
Old 03-11-2009 | 07:06 PM
  #54  
7camaro7's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by LS1W66
Agreed

IMO, At the end of the day if it puts a smile on your face then that's all that matters.
that's why I have to keep modding I keep out growing my performance
Old 03-11-2009 | 09:42 PM
  #55  
just a v6?'s Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: houston,tx
Default

I raced a stock ws6 with my stock regular T/A and beat the crap out of him by 2 cars....its all about the driver
Old 03-12-2009 | 07:05 AM
  #56  
Ethan[ws6]'s Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 851
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis, Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by drummydummy
ARE YOU SERIOUS???

To put it most simply. . . the difference is a hood and badge. THATS IT!

If people stopped worrying about the difference and realized they rolled of the same damn canadian assembly line, comments like the above would not happen.

And the difference between an SS and a WS6?? . . . . ready?

PREFERENCE.

wow. what a thought. I would be more concerned about the differences from year to year.

Look at it this way: I'd much rather have a 2002 regular T/A than a 98 WS6
When you're right you're right lol. year to year differences are way bigger than T/A to ws6 differences. the ws6 has a "different suspension package" not sure what it consists of and really don't care haha. either way I think someone could take a base T/A and payless, and just mod it to make it faster even if the ws6 was faster to begin with. ws6 is mainly just a name, and costs more. i got mine because i like the hood better.
Old 03-12-2009 | 10:27 AM
  #57  
AR15 guy's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Barboursville, WV
Default

Originally Posted by 7camaro7
that's why I have to keep modding I keep out growing my performance
Its only fast until you get used to it.

A buddy of mine just spend 20k on a 1998 convertible vette. I printed out that Hot Rod article to show him. He will be pissed lol.
Old 03-12-2009 | 11:18 AM
  #58  
LS1W66's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 4
From: St. Clair Shores Mi.
Default

Originally Posted by AR15 guy
Its only fast until you get used to it.

A buddy of mine just spend 20k on a 1998 convertible vette. I printed out that Hot Rod article to show him. He will be pissed lol.
Most of us F-body people use that page to show how equal the cars really are. In reality the vette should be quicker because of it's better power to weight ratio. But all in all it's a drivers race because the fastest or more powerfull car is not always the winner.
Old 03-12-2009 | 02:01 PM
  #59  
Bad Blue WS6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
From: Germantown Hills IL
Default

i always thought the air box was taller on a WS6 car, letting in more air.....etc
Old 03-12-2009 | 02:18 PM
  #60  
7camaro7's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by Bad Blue WS6
i always thought the air box was taller on a WS6 car, letting in more air.....etc
All the other boxs would have to be pretty damn small for that to make a difference too. like the rest would have to be open 1/4 of a millimeter and the ws6 still have its like 4in, then yea it would make a difference but I don't think it helps, typically. Now at top speed I bet it helps with the hood design and all.


Quick Reply: difference between T/A and WS6 T/A?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.