GTO VS S200sc
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Davenport, Iowa
Originally Posted by 99SS-T
Wow i thoguht that the SC S2000's did alot better then high 12's. I thought they did mid 13's stock? I obviously havent looked ina import mag in a while! Good kill man!
John
John
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: CALIFORNIA
i raced his s2000mwith my 92 z28, mods in the sig and he hung with me the whole way, i would guess they are high 13 cars stock, but with it supercharged, that little **** can move 
the mighty V8
the mighty V8 
On The Tree
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: central Iowa
Originally Posted by JD_AMG
Base hp was rated at 305, but like all LS1s, the car is really making 350hp/375ft.lbs of torque (assuming it was a healthy LS1).
And the GTO is significantly heavier than F-bodies unfortunetly.
And the GTO is significantly heavier than F-bodies unfortunetly.
I would say most LS1 put out 290 to 310hp at the wheels with a m6. While LS2 are usually around 335 to 350. While the GTO is heavier it should be a pretty even race. My firehawk weighed about 3550 and my GTO is around 3740 so it is not that much difference. Plus the torque on the 6.0 is much better. I ran my friends 03 Z06 from a 15mph roll and we were dead even till about 95 where he started to slowly pull ahead so I know the GTO is pretty quick for a stock car.