DSMS and FBODS....
You'd be better off with a 3575 or T67.
Steve
So 550 whp would be close to 650 engine.
also supposedly someone topped out the FP3065 at 620 awhp.It as one one of the boards.the turbo advertises as 650 which is engine hp apparently.
I also have sheet metal intake already set up for direct port. So power is not a worry.heck 400 whp would be pretty quick in a car that weighs about same as new z06!!
So 550 whp would be close to 650 engine.
also supposedly someone topped out the FP3065 at 620 awhp.It as one one of the boards.the turbo advertises as 650 which is engine hp apparently.
I also have sheet metal intake already set up for direct port. So power is not a worry.heck 400 whp would be pretty quick in a car that weighs about same as new z06!!
I like that V8 TT setup.
That white TA looks just plain evil. Haha
... I am just a potential type guy. I like to know my cars have more potential than I am likely to ever use.
Thats why I like the twin turbo kit I am getting for my 99. You want 400rwhp,500rwhp no problem.You want more with forged internals thats possible too.
You can never be too rich or have too much horsepower!!! LOL
Also I think the FP3065 will be just fine for the 97 talon. Got to draw the line somewhere.
But the 99 trans am the line is drawn much higher up the potential hp chart.
So you think that intercooler looks fairly impressive in the trans am?
I am just a potential type guy. I like to know my cars have more potential than I am likely to ever use.
Thats why I like the twin turbo kit I am getting for my 99. You want 400rwhp,500rwhp no problem.You want more with forged internals thats possible too.
You can never be too rich or have too much horsepower!!! LOL
Also I think the FP3065 will be just fine for the 97 talon. Got to draw the line somewhere.
But the 99 trans am the line is drawn much higher up the potential hp chart.
So you think that intercooler looks fairly impressive in the trans am?
I think the intercooler looks awesome on the car.
All fast toys!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
it is extremely refreshing, and very rare, to see another person (i am also in my 40's) on this forum who appreciates the performance attributes of turbocharged 4-cylinders and V8's like the LS1, you're a true car-person i say. good thread.
Our lt1 and ls1 engines have their problems,the lt1 is a pain to work on,huge pain to change plugs,the opti is a stupid design and the lt1 get the famous intake manifold leak far too often.
The ls1 gets the piston slap thing and both engines have garbage pistons for any serious forced induction use.
Also think 98 /99 lsi had some bad oil pumps.
The 2.0 mits or my 2.4 mits are very easy in many ways to work on.Spark plug changes take like 5 minutes as do ignition wires. Injectors changes are also super quick and easy.The fuel pump is super easy to change out with
access cover.No need to cut the back like ls1 or lt1 install or drop the tank.
Cams can be changed out in maybe an hour.The only weakness I think is the mits motor and maybe other import motors is they seem to use a lot more gaskets than the f bodies do.
The aftermarket is also huge for the 2.0 mits and the 2.4 uses many 2.0 parts.
I have crower rods,crower cams,crower springs,manley valves, manley keepers,wiseco pistons,arp hardware.
All good old american parts in my import motor.Even my clutch,turbo,sheet metal custom intake are all american stuff.
I have owned two mits engines now with over 150,000 miles on them.They were /are running good.
And another bonus..my buddy pickd up my mits bottom end with head attached and carried it into the engine shop by himself..no crane ,1 person. Thats pretty impressive..not sure what it weighed.

Wow, a 28 year old guy that drives an eagle Talon... you must be a real hit with the ladies

You sound like someone who owns a Ferrari. I don't need anything to pull the ladies. I just need me.
Oh yeah, and the ladies giggle when the boost gauge pegs.


how reliable are mitsubishi engines????? 

