96 mustang
Originally Posted by SeVeReDiStOrTiOn
Just because the GT has h/c's does mean it's a aggressive package or a good combo. 96 stock GT auto in the low 15's
...maybe with 60mph wind pushing it the last 1/8. The ford AOD is a crappy tranny..
...maybe with 60mph wind pushing it the last 1/8. The ford AOD is a crappy tranny..AGAIN, I am not denying the kill. I am only second guessing the 8 lengths. Is that hard to understand? I agree, we don't know his H/C combo, but we dont' know what his 'other stuff' is either. We can only speculate. With the H/C, minor bolt ons, and gears, it should have been a driver's race, not eight lengths...that is ALL I am saying.
Originally Posted by ponygt65
AGAIN, I am not denying the kill. I am only second guessing the 8 lengths. Is that hard to understand? I agree, we don't know his H/C combo, but we dont' know what his 'other stuff' is either. We can only speculate. With the H/C, minor bolt ons, and gears, it should have been a driver's race, not eight lengths...that is ALL I am saying.

Originally Posted by ponygt65
AGAIN, I am not denying the kill. I am only second guessing the 8 lengths. Is that hard to understand? I agree, we don't know his H/C combo, but we dont' know what his 'other stuff' is either. We can only speculate. With the H/C, minor bolt ons, and gears, it should have been a driver's race, not eight lengths...that is ALL I am saying.

In any case, good kill.
If the GT would of been an M5 then it would of probably been alot closer. Ford AODE transmissions are crap unless they are rebuilt then they are less crappy. I believe he walked this GT. 1996 absolutely the worst year for the mod SOHC. with the setup he has he is only a high 13.90-14.00 car, no match for a stock LS1

