Crapstang goes down!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 20, 2008 | 03:49 PM

#21

Irunelevens

***Repost Police***

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 2,480

Likes: 0

From: DFW, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by b.lee

Bitemark46 - Brand loyal for a good reason...
that reason is....

because the mustang needs a super or turbo to keep up

and the LS1's do 13.3/13.4 IN STOCK FORM.

what mustang does 13.3 in the 1/4 all stock besides for the supercharged ones? NONE

Ignorance is bliss...

. Ever heard of a Mach 1? I believe 13.0 is the record for the fastest all stock Mach, and they routinely do 13.2-13.4.

Mar 20, 2008 | 03:51 PM

#22

Sarge_13

TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 2,222

Likes: 0

From: Schertz, Texas

Quote:

Originally Posted by Irunelevens

Ignorance is bliss...

. Ever heard of a Mach 1? I believe 13.0 is the record for the fastest all stock Mach, and they routinely do 13.2-13.4.

I thought I saw that a few had hit 12.98 or something?

Mar 20, 2008 | 03:55 PM

#23

Irunelevens

***Repost Police***

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 2,480

Likes: 0

From: DFW, TX

Only ones I'd heard of that hit sub-13.0 had DRs, but I haven't even looked into it in months.

Mar 21, 2008 | 11:01 PM

#24

Newskool Mach

10 Second Club

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 71

Likes: 0

From: Royal Palm Beach FL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Irunelevens

Only ones I'd heard of that hit sub-13.0 had DRs, but I haven't even looked into it in months.

Go to the Mach 1 registry. There are several bone stock M5 Mach's that went in the 12.8-12.9 range. Hell my A4 went 13.74 bone stock, on a 95 degree day with no cool down.

Mar 22, 2008 | 01:02 AM

#25

ThisBlood147

TECH Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 2007

Posts: 700

Likes: 0

From: Louisiana, USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Newskool Mach

Go to the Mach 1 registry. There are several bone stock M5 Mach's that went in the 12.8-12.9 range. Hell my A4 went 13.74 bone stock, on a 95 degree day with no cool down.

Ga-damn. They must be powershiftin the **** outta those things. I thought 13.1 was the quickest one had run bone stock.

Mar 22, 2008 | 11:13 AM

#26

Sarge_13

TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 2,222

Likes: 0

From: Schertz, Texas

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThisBlood147

Ga-damn. They must be powershiftin the **** outta those things. I thought 13.1 was the quickest one had run bone stock.

+1
Learn somethin every day!

Mar 22, 2008 | 12:41 PM

#27

unit213

Administrator

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 45,841

Likes: 5

From: Earth

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarge_13

'99 and '01 Cobra, Mach 1 to name a couple.

2000 Cobra R

Good kill on the Mustang to the OP.

Mar 22, 2008 | 01:28 PM

#28

Sarge_13

TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 2,222

Likes: 0

From: Schertz, Texas

Quote:

Originally Posted by unit213

2000 Cobra R

Good kill on the Mustang to the OP.

And the new Bullitt is supposed to be able to hit 13.2 or so

Mar 22, 2008 | 09:24 PM

#29

Newskool Mach

10 Second Club

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 71

Likes: 0

From: Royal Palm Beach FL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThisBlood147

Ga-damn. They must be powershiftin the **** outta those things. I thought 13.1 was the quickest one had run bone stock.

Yes they are beating the **** out of them. I wonder if they do have DR's and they are not sayin.

Mar 24, 2008 | 04:50 AM

#30

Black FormulaLs1

12 Second Club

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 2,089

Likes: 1

From: cape vincent NY

am going to laugh my a$$ off when i find a new *bullitt mustang* and rape him w/ my formula...why spend over $30K for a car that MIGHT run HIGH 12's?...lmao..

Mar 24, 2008 | 04:59 AM

#31

PowershifterNC

TECH Apprentice

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 394

Likes: 0

hmmm...and your car ran what new?

Mar 24, 2008 | 07:27 AM

#32

PewterScreaminMach

TECH Addict

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 2,628

Likes: 2

From: Austin, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by mycamaroSS

dude you shouldnt have raced him, they shouldnt think that they think we "want" to race them cause we think they're fast..im sure that's what stang drivers think. An 03 GT tried racing me today and just gave him a smile and made him feel really dumb, i think that's more entertaining than wasting my gas on those POS's

Huh, it's weird to see such an ignorant statement from someone with so many posts on this site. And he probably didn't feel dumb, he probably just thought you didn't know how to race and were afraid you'd lose to a Ford...

Nice kill, OP.

Mar 24, 2008 | 07:31 AM

#33

PewterScreaminMach

TECH Addict

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 2,628

Likes: 2

From: Austin, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bitemark46

You Chebby guys are so brand loyal its comical. -Mark

Haha, yeah, it's just us Chevy guys.....there aren't owners like that from every Make and Model.....

Don't make me start quoting from all my threads on SVTP.

Mar 24, 2008 | 08:08 AM

#34

PowershifterNC

TECH Apprentice

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 394

Likes: 0

I've owned fords dodges and imports but you're right when it comes down to it I prefer a chevy

Mar 24, 2008 | 09:38 AM

#35

unit213

Administrator

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 45,841

Likes: 5

From: Earth

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black FormulaLs1

am going to laugh my a$$ off when i find a new *bullitt mustang* and rape him w/ my formula...why spend over $30K for a car that MIGHT run HIGH 12's?...lmao..

You're not going to rape anything running 12.50's.

Mar 24, 2008 | 11:20 AM

#36

Irunelevens

***Repost Police***

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 2,480

Likes: 0

From: DFW, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black FormulaLs1

am going to laugh my a$$ off when i find a new *bullitt mustang* and rape him w/ my formula...why spend over $30K for a car that MIGHT run HIGH 12's?...lmao..

I guess all those people that spent $30k+ for F-bodies and $40k+ for C5 Corvettes were dumb too, right?

Mar 24, 2008 | 02:17 PM

#37

Newskool Mach

10 Second Club

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 71

Likes: 0

From: Royal Palm Beach FL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black FormulaLs1

am going to laugh my a$$ off when i find a new *bullitt mustang* and rape him w/ my formula...why spend over $30K for a car that MIGHT run HIGH 12's?...lmao..

Because Chevy is draggin it's *** on the new Camaro. When it does come out it will be $60000 for a year.

Mar 24, 2008 | 08:54 PM

#38

speedshifterNC

11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 575

Likes: 0

Quote:

Because Chevy is draggin it's *** on the new Camaro.

You said that right...if they wait any longer they might as well not even make a V8 model the way gas is looking....greedy oil companys

Mar 25, 2008 | 12:37 PM

#39

Steve C.

TECH Regular

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 424

Likes: 0

From: Houston, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by b.lee

Bitemark46 - Brand loyal for a good reason...
that reason is....

because the mustang needs a super or turbo to keep up

and the LS1's do 13.3/13.4 IN STOCK FORM.

what mustang does 13.3 in the 1/4 all stock besides for the supercharged ones? NONE

I laugh everytime someone says this.

I will attempt to match your retarded statement: "Well the LS1 needs an extra 1.1 L displacement to beat a Mustang"

Two different types of engines, pick on and mod it. Who cares whos faster stock.

Mar 25, 2008 | 12:39 PM

#40

LS1SS01

On The Tree

Joined: Nov 2007

Posts: 183

Likes: 1

From: West Palm Beach, Fl

Quote:

Originally Posted by Newskool Mach

Because Chevy is draggin it's *** on the new Camaro. When it does come out it will be $60000 for a year.

Everyone is saying that the mark-ups will be insane on the new Camaro like they were on the GT500. If this is true, a lot of people will just get a used LS3 vette. I've already seen them in used car mags for 35k.

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 3
Next
Last