3-point SFC's or standard SFC's
2 point are generally lighter
as far as i'm concerned the 3points are a waste on all but the most extreme cars. that 3rd connection point is the tunnel brace mount...which is relatively thin metal to begin with. the only way i can see that being any stronger is if you install an aftermarket tunnel brace along with the SFC.
i installed BMR boxed sfc, which stiffened up the car significantly. and i lost almost no ground clearance.
Last edited by BMR Tech2; Dec 9, 2008 at 09:26 AM.
3 pts. are stronger
Simply put, if you feel the car needs to be improved in terms of chassis stiffness how can you not opt for 3 pts.? The only reason to run 2 pts. is cost. They cost less because there is not as much to them.
I'm not saying that 2 pts. are bad. Hell, I think in a number of cases SFC's are not required or needed. I'm simply saying you need to weigh what you want to improve and what it's worth to you.
But if you run a tunnel mount TA, I feel 3 pts. are a must do.
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If you are running any type of shorter tunnel mounted torque arm I recommend the 3-Point SFC's since they bolt under the torque arm mounts to prevent stress to the floor of the vehicle. Other than that the 2-Point set-ups will be just fine.
We offer a large selection of SFC's seen here- http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=129
If you have any questions please ask. Thank you!
Ryan








