what does 'NWS sig pic removed' mean?
Administrator
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 5
From: Earth
Originally Posted by Inspector12
I think that a girl in a bikini and a girl holding them are pretty close to the same IMO, and I know of quite a few others with signatures with girls in bikini's in them. You still can't see any of the stuff that you would say in a strip club. I have seen the same pose on public TV before. Now I have said all this based on the photo's I saw in the other post about being a moderator as I didn't see his sig. Now you guys enforce the rules so don't get me wrong do what you want I am just playing the devils advocate as I could care less. I think that if you are going to start censoring all signatures you might want to take another look around at some others also. Just some food for thought as I am done with this subject guys have a nice weekend.
so killing all of them is difficult.
I changed my sig pic too, since it was deleted. Amazingly, I had the same girl in mine with almost the same camera angle as cyphur_traq has for an avatar...
Oh, well. I can live without a girl in mine. So I hope this one lasts longer.
Oh, well. I can live without a girl in mine. So I hope this one lasts longer.
Wait a minute I really don't get this...
So cyphur_traq can have a pic of Vida Guerra in a bikini with her *** showing, but Shinerbock07 can't have a pic in his sig of a girl holding her boobies??
I'm not seeing the difference...
So cyphur_traq can have a pic of Vida Guerra in a bikini with her *** showing, but Shinerbock07 can't have a pic in his sig of a girl holding her boobies??
I'm not seeing the difference...
Administrator
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 5
From: Earth
Originally Posted by Domestic Demon
Wait a minute I really don't get this...
So cyphur_traq can have a pic of Vida Guerra in a bikini with her *** showing, but Shinerbock07 can't have a pic in his sig of a girl holding her boobies??
I'm not seeing the difference...
So cyphur_traq can have a pic of Vida Guerra in a bikini with her *** showing, but Shinerbock07 can't have a pic in his sig of a girl holding her boobies??
I'm not seeing the difference...
should remove it, but he's a mod so he can make that decision himself.
I'm not going to step on his toes by removing it.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0
Brett Foote
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
you sit back and argue with a long-standing mod about your signature, yet you begged to be a mod earlier tonite? uberlame. 
Originally Posted by unit213
If it were a member's avatar, I would remove it. Personally, I think he
should remove it, but he's a mod so he can make that decision himself.
I'm not going to step on his toes by removing it.
should remove it, but he's a mod so he can make that decision himself.
I'm not going to step on his toes by removing it.
How can one enforce a rule that they don't follow themselves?? That's hypocritical.
Administrator
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 5
From: Earth
Originally Posted by Domestic Demon
So basically there's a double standard. If "The rules are the rules", then they should apply to everyone, mods included.
How can one enforce a rule that they don't follow themselves?? That's hypocritical.
How can one enforce a rule that they don't follow themselves?? That's hypocritical.
...oh well..i miss my sig.
... i'll go ahead and remove it. it seems to be causing too many problems. i'll try to find a less revealing pic this time.
nobody complained when i had the inverse-color scheme of the lesbians making out.
nobody complained when i had the inverse-color scheme of the lesbians making out.
Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
i'll go ahead and remove it. it seems to be causing too many problems. i'll try to find a less revealing pic this time.
nobody complained when i had the inverse-color scheme of the lesbians making out.
nobody complained when i had the inverse-color scheme of the lesbians making out.
), its just the fact that there was a double standard going on. Thanks for eliminating that issue.
people dont get "approved" to have something like that, when its against site policy. another mod made the call that your sig was pushing the lines, and so be it. just like i can't have vida's FINE *** as my avatar. drop it - or you're going to quickly gain a negative reputation.
anyhow, this thread has run its course.
anyhow, this thread has run its course.