Western Members CA, AZ, NV, UT, CO, NM, HI

Anyone have one? Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT for LS1 & LS2's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2010, 07:53 AM
  #21  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
C5natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 659
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Well guys, I am seriously contimplating this. We'll see when my tax return comes in. Btw, I saw something yesterday that caught my eye, one of my LS1 books stated that they have seen a 15rwhp increase with the FAST over the LS6 intake. Then while Googling the Edelbrock one guy said he got a 39hp increase on the dyno over a LS6 with Edelbrock... he had Patriot 2.5 heads and a decent cam so...Im not sure. Still looking for more info and dyno sheets for the Edelbrock.

Also, I might get a cowl for the hell of it now that Ive been looking at some.
Old 03-27-2010, 06:05 PM
  #22  
Teching In
 
TNT76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A few weeks ago I did a back to back swap on my '02 LS1. Everything was basically stock except for some "HSV" Shorty style headers and twin 2.5" exhaust and over radiator intake. The runs were done on a Dyno Dynamics eddy current dyno.
Base run with std LS6 manifold once tuned was 238rwkw (318rwhp) peaking around 5700 -5800rpm. Did a straight swap over retaining the std throttlebody and pulled 230 odd rwkw(308hp)peaking around 6300-6400rpm, running pretty rich through the midrange and a little rich on the topend. Retuned to decent mixtures and a few different spark curves and eventually got to 237-238rwkw(317hp), still peaking around 6300-6400, also way down in the low and midrange. Last change was installing an 84mm throttlebody but with a 75mm neck. With a slight tweak of the tune, it peaked out at 241rwkw(322hp).
Will post up a graph when I go print it out.
This is a std cam.
Maybe once the airflow demands exceed the LS6 then this manifold may shine, but for a std motor it may make a few more peak hp but there was a HUGE hit in the low and mid range.
I put the LS6 back on for the time being.
This was in a '02 monaro (GTO) auto.

Last edited by TNT76; 03-28-2010 at 12:16 AM.
Old 03-27-2010, 08:50 PM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
 
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,188
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TNT76
A few weeks ago I did a back to back swap on my '02 LS1. Everything was basically stock except for some "HSV" Shorty style headers and twin 2.5" exhaust and over radiator intake. The runs were done on a Dyno Dynamics eddy current dyno.
Base run with std LS6 manifold once tuned was 238rwkw (318rwhp) peaking around 5700 -5800rpm. Did a straight swap over retaining the std throttlebody and pulled 230 odd rwkw(308hp)peaking around 6300-6400rpm, running pretty rich through the midrange and a little rich on the topend. Retuned to dencent mixtures and a few different spark curves and eventually got to 237-238rwkw(317hp), still peaking around 6300-6400, also way down in the low and midrange. Last change was installing an 84mm throttlebody but with a 75mm neck. With a slight tweak of the tune, it peaked out at 241rwkw(322hp).
Will post up a graph when I go print it out.
This is a std cam.
Maybe once the airflow demands exceed the LS6 then this manifold may shine, but for a std motor it may make a few more peak hp but there was a HUGE hit in the low and mid range.
I put the LS6 back on for the time being.
This was in a '02 monaro (GTO) auto.
Yeah, proflow on a stock, or near stock motor (as in your case) will show less than stellar results...but on a heads/cam/intake/exhaust engine I imagine it would really shine above 5000 rpms.
Old 03-27-2010, 10:06 PM
  #24  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: murrieta
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

FAST>proflow, the fast will make more power sooner and alot more torque, under the curve will suffer badly..... i have tuned them both i have seen what numbers they both produce
Old 03-28-2010, 10:00 PM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
jmarsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryne @ CMS
FAST>proflow, the fast will make more power sooner and alot more torque, under the curve will suffer badly..... i have tuned them both i have seen what numbers they both produce
What fast and TB size are you specifically talking about. Your post was kinda vague.

--JMarsa
Old 03-31-2010, 06:13 PM
  #26  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: murrieta
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

fast 90/92



Quick Reply: Anyone have one? Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT for LS1 & LS2's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.