Quick question
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....87&postcount=9
'97-'99 199/207 0.472/0.479 117
'00 198/209 0.500/0.500 115.5
'01-'03 198/207 0.467/0.479 116
Corvette (LS6)
'01 204/211 0.525/0.525 116
'02-'04 204/218 0.555/0.551 117.5
Camaro/Firebird:
'98-'00 198/209 0.500/0.500 119.5
'01-'02 196/207 0.467/0.479 116
1998 - 2000 Fbody
202/210 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.496" / 0.496" int/exh lift
116 LSA
2001 - 2002 Fbody
197/207 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.467" / 0.479" int/exh lift
116 LSA
Thats what I found from smokemup.com Seems to be different than yours? Where was yours from?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
the motors were slightly different though, as the corvette had drive-by-wire and the alternator on top, F-body had drive-by-cable and the alternator down below.
and yes, in 01, 02 the cam was downgraded in the F-body because of the addition of the LS6 manifold.
Heres a direct comparison of stock Vette VS Trans Am.....
This one thread that JRp came up with back in the day can pretty much sum up any other related questions you guys have...
https://ls1tech.com/forums/new-ls1-owners-newbie-tech/213148-jrp-s-faq-commonly-asked-questions.html
I like your explanation better though.
Heres a direct comparison of stock Vette VS Trans Am.....
This one thread that JRp came up with back in the day can pretty much sum up any other related questions you guys have...
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=213148
Damn good links man. I always hear about the underrating of the FBodies but thats the first proof I've seen with side by side, year to year comparisons


