Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Yank SS or PT converter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2006, 10:17 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
BarneyMobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Yank SS or PT converter?

Whats the difference between a Yank SS4000 and a PT4000 stall converter? Which one will do better for me? I'm an N/A car full weigh soon to be running a big cam (24x) and heads on my LT1. Later on down the road I plan on spraying a small 100 shot.

I was poking around on Yank's site and in the converter selector section says I sould be running the PT4000. I'm under the (Ported heads, 230+cam and 3.73's).
Old 12-04-2006, 12:27 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
import slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am not sure of the diffrence but I use the PT 4400 and I love it.
Old 12-04-2006, 01:49 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
AutomagicLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shawnee,KS
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Pt4000
Old 12-04-2006, 01:58 AM
  #4  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BarneyMobile
Whats the difference between a Yank SS4000 and a PT4000 stall converter? Which one will do better for me? I'm an N/A car full weigh soon to be running a big cam (24x) and heads on my LT1. Later on down the road I plan on spraying a small 100 shot.

I was poking around on Yank's site and in the converter selector section says I sould be running the PT4000. I'm under the (Ported heads, 230+cam and 3.73's).
Call them. They are more than happy to discuss your cars specs and goals....and pick the perfect converter for you.

You will get a much better/accurate answer by calling them.
Old 12-04-2006, 10:11 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I've had both of the them in my car.

The SS4000 is a bit tighter feeling and will handle a 150 shot well. For a daily driver, it is easier to deal with if you have a lot of intown driving. You'll use about 300 rpm less under part throttle with SS4000 compared to the YTP 4000.

The YTP 4000 is very loose and has a longer shift extension. It doesn't handle the spray as well unless you shift very high (e.g. 6800), although 100 shot isn't much. I liked this one the better for street racing. It was easier to roll into the throttle on stoplight races and the long shift extension was great for highway burts too. The shift extension is long enough to make a real difference on the 2-3 upshift.

If you were a pure NA performance, a YTP 4200 (had that too ) is my choice. It's the best converter I've driven.
Old 12-04-2006, 01:57 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
BarneyMobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

This may sound stupid but could someone explain to me the definition of a shift extension?
Old 12-04-2006, 03:15 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
BarneyMobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I just got off the phone with Yank and they told me the the SS4000 is better for NOS and the PT4000 is best for N/A. I do nt plan on running NOS for another 8 months or so and I dont want to have to order another converter when I install the nos. My main concern is that will the SS4000 be looser and out perform my Fuddle 3200?
Old 12-04-2006, 03:32 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
GregWS6&z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes it will be looser and out perform your 3200
Old 12-04-2006, 05:25 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
import slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

why are the ss converters better for N20 than the PT converters?
Old 12-04-2006, 08:00 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by import slayer
why are the ss converters better for N20 than the PT converters?
They have a lower NA shift extension and stretch less under the added torque from the spray.
Old 12-04-2006, 08:47 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
12secSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Shift Extension = The point where your RPMs drop down to after the shift. Say if your shift from 2nd ends at 6500, then where the rpms drop down to for 3rd is your shift extension, say 5000.

With nitrous you can easily over power the transmission more over then what the converter was designed for. This can cause your desired shift point of 6500 rpms, to occur at 6800 rpms. If your limiter is set at 6700 ... guess what, you hit the limiter. By using a different stator design (and/or Impeller/Turbine combo), you can have a converter that will true stall at 4000 rpms, yet transfer better torque from an increased power adder ... or for a tighter feel. Although the lower (tighter 2.4+) Stall Torque Ratio (STR) converters do offer better efficiency over higher (looser -2.2) STR converters.

Sounds like Yank help you make a wise choice.



Quick Reply: Yank SS or PT converter?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.