Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

SVT Not To Be: Ford Kills Of It's Performance Division

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2006, 12:06 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
bruddah_man_matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Palolo Valley HI, or Whitter SoCal
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default SVT Not To Be: Ford Kills Of It's Performance Division

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=109512

The division that gave us the F-Body eating TC and that sparked the full size performance truck segment is going the way of the dodo. Ford is pulling the plug on its SVT operation. At least most of it. The division may be relegated to tuning suspensions and maybe boosting horsepower through bolt ons. Tis a sad say for performance fans.

While the '93-'95 1st gen Lightning was little more than Ford's attempt to build a 351 powered 454SS competitor, it was the 2nd gen introduced in '99 and built until 2004 that really got things going. Because of the 2nd gen Lightning Dodge gave us the ballsy *** Ram SRT-10 SC and QC and Chevy the half hearted but more useable Silverado SS and to some extent the retarded SSR.

On the pony car side of things, Ford unlike GM continually updated the Cobra throughout it's lifespan. As a final hurrah for the SN95 cars Ford gave us the TC capable of putting Camaros and Firebirds to shame. If only Ford had introduced the TC in '02 I'm sure F-Body fans would have shead tears over the fact that a blue oval had the power to take out their beloved 35th Anniversary SSs and Special Edition T/As. The TC Cobra despite being supplanted by the GT500 remains a force to be reckoned with on the street, on the track and at the strip.

On the lighter side of things, Ford also gave us the 195hp SVT Contour and the 170hp SVT Focus. Both cars were underpowered but often made up for this at auto-x courses by being underpinned by well tuned suspensions. The SVT Focus while underpowered by competition from Honda, Mazda, Dodge and many other brands remains a tarmac terrorist till today. The Contour on the other hand disappeared into the night.

With the 390hp Sport Trac Adrenalin backed by a 6 speed automatic on the horizon, a 500hp 3rd gen Lightning in the pipe, the GT500 raising hell all over the autoshow circuit and a rumored SVT Fusion a large possibility, it seemed that SVT was about to go toe to toe with Chrysler's SRT division. However this was not to be. Apparently Ford did things a little too quickly and aggressively when it came to building it's ubercar GT and pushed SVTs main products to the side. It has reached the point where SVT no longer has the funding, resources or manpower to continue building capable street machines. Tis a sad day for performance gurus.
Old 03-08-2006, 12:16 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
WILWAXU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 14,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yeah, read about that last night. I feared that would happened after John Coletti retired. He was the main driving force behind that team. Should be interesting to see how the new Ford performance cars are marketed.
Old 03-08-2006, 12:24 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
dgformula2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's very surprising. I guess the upcoming Shelby Cobra GT500 is no longer officially a SVT product. Well at least that will shorten the name a bit.
Old 03-08-2006, 12:28 PM
  #4  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

What's a Mustang TC???

I know he's talking about the 03-04 cobras with the superchargers, but what's the TC stand for??
Old 03-08-2006, 12:28 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
GMCVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

As a previous SVT owner as I'm sure several people are on the board, it is a sad day.
Old 03-08-2006, 12:30 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
GMCVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
What's a Mustang TC???

I know he's talking about the 03-04 cobras with the superchargers, but what's the TC stand for??
Terminator Cobra
Old 03-08-2006, 01:04 PM
  #7  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
Nautilus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: VT/SC
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I read that a couple days ago.... but I have also read that the badges for the new GT500 were going to have both SVT and Shelby on them....


Edit: guess not.... Pics
Old 03-08-2006, 01:07 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
 
WECIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I thought Shelby was taking over there operation and that would be the new name. There are supposedly Shelby trucks on the way, per Motor Trend.
Old 03-08-2006, 01:17 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
 
Lt1FBoDy209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sounds like a move GM would pull....
Old 03-08-2006, 03:24 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
OmniRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Carlilse, Pa
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

it will be back used to be SVO
Old 03-08-2006, 05:42 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
2000Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Fl. - Hurricane Highway
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So they lost everybody marketing staff, relations etc. I own a Trans Am but **** i would have no problem working for SVT just to keep it alive. Sad to see it go.
-Joel
Old 03-08-2006, 05:50 PM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This isn't the way forward Ford, it's a huge step backward. Enthusiast and enthusiast-oriented products MAKE US automakers. GM PD and Chrysler SRT are enjoying a huge degree of success and Ford is bowing out?

This is just ridiculous, especially after all the promising concepts they had. The Lightning had all the right stuff to be a mega hit. The Adrenalin was cool and different, and who doesn't want to see a mean, turbocharged, AWD Fusion?

This is a very sad day for US auto enthusiasts.
Old 03-08-2006, 05:51 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default



At least Australia isn't getting left out of hot factory Fords. But then again they pretty much run their own show independent of Dearborn.
Old 03-08-2006, 09:26 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
bruddah_man_matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Palolo Valley HI, or Whitter SoCal
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TriShield


At least Australia isn't getting left out of hot factory Fords. But then again they pretty much run their own show independent of Dearborn.
The guys in Oz always have all the fun. HSV and FPV are the shiznit. I still remember a few years back during the pre-FPV days when Tickford ran Ford of Oz's performance operations for a couple years. FPVs current lineup includes some bad *** sedans and utes powered by one of two powerhouses. Either the 5.4L Boss 290 naturally aspirated DOHC V8 or the Boss 270 4.0L turbo inline 6. Both motors are numbered for their output in kW. 290kW translates to 389hp and 270kW translates to 362hp. From what I've heard because of the turbo inline 6s lower weight, the cars fitted with them handle a bit better and also run about the same times as those posted by the V8 models. Not only that, but supposedly they're a bit easier to mod since they're already turbocharged from the factory. The 4.0L urbo inline 6 also puts out more torque than the 5.4L NA V8 at 409 lb.ft. vs. 384 lb.ft. for the V8.

The coolest thing about Ford's FPV lineup is that since the introduction of the BF gen cars in 2005 they're available with either a T-56 6 speed manual (which replaced the previous 5 speed in 2004 on the BA II) and now a ZF 6 speed automatic as well (previously a 4 speed was the only slushbox available). This puts them ahead of HSV in the transmission department as HSVs are available with either a T-56 or an old school 4 speed automatic. At least this is how it is with the current VZ cars. With the introduction of the next gen VE cars, Holden may add a gear or two to their automatic backed cars.

On a side note, Ford has the entire market in terms of high performance 6 cylinders. Before the introduction of the 4.0L turbo inline 6, HSV offered supercharged 3800 Series II pushrod V6s with 240hp IIRC. However with the introduction of the Boss 270 motor HSV realized that their age old pushrod V6 wouldn't cut it and that the LS1 and eventually the LS2 were superior motors anyway. Now HSVs entire lineup (save for it's AWD models which make do with LS1s and the VXR which is powered by a 240hp 2.0L 4) are powered by LS2s.

[/rant]
Old 03-08-2006, 09:32 PM
  #15  
Moderator
iTrader: (33)
 
BizZzatch350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 9,787
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Sucks, I'm a GM gie die hard to the core, but I have respect for the SVT brand. The 03-04 Cobras were my mind some of the best Mustangs ever built. Shame
Old 03-08-2006, 09:49 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
1970judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Republic of Tx
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That sucks Die hard GM guy here too but still.
Old 03-08-2006, 09:51 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
1970judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Republic of Tx
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That sucks Die hard GM guy here too but still. Mainly because i was looking into a 03/04 cobra now i bet they will sky rocket in price..
Old 03-08-2006, 10:04 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
J E T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canal Winchester, OH
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm a GM guy at heart, but I still love Ford and MOPAR. This really sucks that this is happening. I've often thought about once I get my car paid off to get a low priced SVT Cobra (around 7-8k), and I may just do that since they may go up in price cuz of this.
Old 03-09-2006, 06:29 AM
  #19  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Not good. So much for competition. I'm sure the SVT owners assoc. isn't too pleased.
Old 03-09-2006, 09:49 AM
  #20  
Ginger Hater
 
Spazdout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: College Station, Tx
Posts: 2,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
What's a Mustang TC???

I know he's talking about the 03-04 cobras with the superchargers, but what's the TC stand for??
back in 84 they had a mustang that was Turbo Charged(TC) but it was under the name of SVO. pretty mean lil bugger. but i doubt the SVT program was around that long ago.


Quick Reply: SVT Not To Be: Ford Kills Of It's Performance Division



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.