56 Ford F100 5.3L swap
#1
56 Ford F100 5.3L swap
'56 Ford F100
2005 5.3L 4L60e
3.92 gears
Mustang II IFS
E-fans and CAI being installed next
inital tune gets 22mpg. Sooting for 24-26;. not bad for 3.92 gears.
http://s704.photobucket.com/albums/w...final_xvid.mp4
2005 5.3L 4L60e
3.92 gears
Mustang II IFS
E-fans and CAI being installed next
inital tune gets 22mpg. Sooting for 24-26;. not bad for 3.92 gears.
http://s704.photobucket.com/albums/w...final_xvid.mp4
Last edited by aknovaman; 03-18-2011 at 10:38 PM.
#3
Staging Lane
Anthony,
I watched your video, what a cool truck! I see where you where aiming for mid-20 MPG, were you successful?
Do you re-do the factory GM harness for these swaps?
or
Use a aftermarket harness?
Glenn
I watched your video, what a cool truck! I see where you where aiming for mid-20 MPG, were you successful?
Do you re-do the factory GM harness for these swaps?
or
Use a aftermarket harness?
Glenn
#4
Owner is currently getting 22mpg but 24 is achievable as I just put a generic tune in it and the owner wanted the truck tuned so he could drive it last summer.
I re-work the factory harness by removing un-necessary wires, adding relays, OBD2 port and chk engine LED, etc. I also re-route the wires to remove/streamline the factory worm mess (snakey) layout.
I re-work the factory harness by removing un-necessary wires, adding relays, OBD2 port and chk engine LED, etc. I also re-route the wires to remove/streamline the factory worm mess (snakey) layout.
#5
Staging Lane
Thank you for the reply Anthony.
Question: Regarding the 5.3 w/4L60E , I just brought home a 2005 out of a Avalanche today and it is going into my Chevy II Station Wagon.... what rear gear ratio would you run to potentially obtain 26+ MPG?
Question: Regarding the 5.3 w/4L60E , I just brought home a 2005 out of a Avalanche today and it is going into my Chevy II Station Wagon.... what rear gear ratio would you run to potentially obtain 26+ MPG?
#7
Staging Lane
My choices of rear gear ratios are : 2.76 - 2.97 - 3.23 - 3.55
My Wagon has been a Drag car for 35+ years and has a Chrysler rearend under it.
Thank you for your help!
My Wagon has been a Drag car for 35+ years and has a Chrysler rearend under it.
Thank you for your help!
Trending Topics
#9
yeah sweet swap! im helping a buddy with a 52 ford f1. just put a zigs mustang 2 front in it. and planning on a 4 link rear with coil overs.
engine is a 04 tahoe 5.3 2wd 4l60e. 87k on it. all sensors, harness, computer, fuse boxes...all accesories are with it.
question---ive read the rear ends in 51 (?)---to idk..maybe 53 are dana 44's with 3.73's in them. the truck was a flathead v8...im thinking this rear will hold some power...or does someone think different???
engine is a 04 tahoe 5.3 2wd 4l60e. 87k on it. all sensors, harness, computer, fuse boxes...all accesories are with it.
question---ive read the rear ends in 51 (?)---to idk..maybe 53 are dana 44's with 3.73's in them. the truck was a flathead v8...im thinking this rear will hold some power...or does someone think different???
#12
Custom fabricated tubular mounts. Pretty basic, just a plate, ears, bushings, tube and a plate bolted on the crossmember. Go to liquid iron industries for a sample of the mounts.
Stock rear ends are pretty beefy. Just need all new lines brakes, seals and fluids.
Stock rear ends are pretty beefy. Just need all new lines brakes, seals and fluids.
#15
TECH Resident
I have a '51 with an L92 / 6L80 - don't come anywhere near 24mpg. I get an honest 11 to 15.. Many build pictures attached below... Might give you ideas about steering column. Had to snake around the exhaust and I built a short steering column as I did want a horizontal flat steering wheel. Fabbed custom engine and trans mounts. Had to modify the trans tunnel cover significantly to clear the trans. I put the engine as far back as possible. About 1/4" from the firewall at the driver's rear valve cover.. Weight split is 55 / 45 static F/R.
https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/#B0855Z2WMGOKzTn
https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/#B0855Z2WMGOKzTn
#17
TECH Resident
It put down 352 rw ft lbs and 340 rwhp engine is stock. I was thinking the larger displacement 6.2L caused the reduced mileage.
Others called his Dyno conservative. Quite a few SoCal users here use Cunningham.
My average is probably 14 mpg. And I do get on it regularly but very rarely see WOT.