Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Street Car, !Front Bumper Support?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2005, 11:31 AM
  #1  
Sold The Fun Stuff :(
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
josh99ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Street Car, !Front Bumper Support?

Just how dangerous is removing the front bumper support on a street car? I hit the track up a handful of times a year, most of the driving is done on the street and since its not a max effort car anyway. This would lead me to believe that I'd be better off just leaving it alone. What do you guys think?
Old 05-09-2005, 11:43 AM
  #2  
Moderator
 
xp3nd4bl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Murrieta
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by josh99ta
Just how dangerous is removing the front bumper support on a street car? I hit the track up a handful of times a year, most of the driving is done on the street and since its not a max effort car anyway. This would lead me to believe that I'd be better off just leaving it alone. What do you guys think?
Yank it!

Don't get in an accident. In my experience wrecking F-cars the frame is where the strentgh is.
Old 05-09-2005, 11:59 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
glennster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Leave it alone,make your car fast and brag about no weight reduction.A street car is not a racecar,stay safe.
Old 05-09-2005, 12:54 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
SScam68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Albuquerque NM - The Land of 8000ft DA
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

...then leave it alone
Old 05-09-2005, 03:43 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (70)
 
chpmnsws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Springfield IL
Posts: 2,525
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by glennster
Leave it alone,make your car fast and brag about no weight reduction.A street car is not a racecar,stay safe.

but its that much faster with weight out

mines been pulled for 2 years and DD'd for the first year
Old 05-09-2005, 04:01 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
GM Muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Laconia, NH
Posts: 3,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine has been out for acouple of years now. I feel safe with it out. The rails stick out so that leaves you some protection, obvious if you centered a telephone pole or tree you could be screwed. It sounds to me like you don't want to pull it, so if you think your ok with an extra 18-20lbs on the nose, leave it.
Old 05-09-2005, 06:37 PM
  #7  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (23)
 
tektrans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'd leave it. I have pulled my HVAC, PS, ABS etc. but I'm leaving the bumpers in. If you wanna take the 20lbs off the nose, move the battery to the rear, get a lightweight k member, remove somestuff. That's just my opinion.
Old 05-09-2005, 07:47 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
94 TA TT2S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How did you TA guys remount the foglights with the Bumper support gone?????
Old 05-09-2005, 08:12 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
SUX2BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 94 TA TT2S
How did you TA guys remount the foglights with the Bumper support gone?????
You don't. fog lights are heavy anyways.
Old 05-09-2005, 09:57 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
John_D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon TN
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Josh, I have a few pics of how I did it, in my mtfba photo gallery. The Camaro is a little different than your setup, plus I was doing a front breather conversion at the same time, so some of the pics won't apply exactly. I retained part of the metal beam, and part of the styrofoam, because I didn't want to have the fascia buckle in at speed. Still got rid of 75% of the weight, and a whole lot more air through the radiator.
Old 05-09-2005, 10:24 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
SUX2BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i still think its funny that people think the front bumper cover will buckle in on itself atr high speeds.
Old 05-09-2005, 10:41 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (23)
 
Turo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by John_D.
Josh, I have a few pics of how I did it, in my mtfba photo gallery. The Camaro is a little different than your setup, plus I was doing a front breather conversion at the same time, so some of the pics won't apply exactly. I retained part of the metal beam, and part of the styrofoam, because I didn't want to have the fascia buckle in at speed. Still got rid of 75% of the weight, and a whole lot more air through the radiator.
Got a link to those pics? I'm interested in seeing how its done, thanks!
Old 05-10-2005, 07:55 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
John_D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon TN
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Pictures 3-17 on page 1 show the whole front breather conversion, except for where I sealed up the bottom. The last few pictures show what remained of the beam and the foam.
http://www.mtfba.org/forum/category.php?cid=36
Old 05-10-2005, 08:13 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
John_D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon TN
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SUX2BU
i still think its funny that people think the front bumper cover will buckle in on itself atr high speeds.

Hilarious ain't it... Air flow at 100mph+ can't have any significant force on an unsupported piece of plastic.

SmokinHawk must have been dreaming when he wrote this:
(dang 3000 post newb's...)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-tech/270127-racers-poll-who-s-removed-their-bumper-supports-does-your-front-clip-sag.html

And Chrispy too, on the second page of this post.
(heck he's only got nearly 9000 posts, he's still wet behind the ears.)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-tech/239054-camaro-owners-without-bumper-supports-come-aero-related.html
Old 05-10-2005, 08:16 AM
  #15  
TWS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (63)
 
TWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by glennster
Leave it alone,make your car fast and brag about no weight reduction.A street car is not a racecar,stay safe.
That's MHO also. Even my "primary" track car, the '94, is driven a good bit on the street. The way these knuckleheads drive around Austin... I'm not willing to chance it for a 20 lbs weight reduction. 20 lbs will not make much of a diff in your ET. Maybe a couple hundredths.

For a car that sees any significant amount of street time, I say leave it in.
Old 05-10-2005, 08:40 AM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
jay_99z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by John_D.
Hilarious ain't it... Air flow at 100mph+ can't have any significant force on an unsupported piece of plastic.

SmokinHawk must have been dreaming when he wrote this:
(dang 3000 post newb's...)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=270127

And Chrispy too, on the second page of this post.
(heck he's only got nearly 9000 posts, he's still wet behind the ears.)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=239054

FYI......post counts don't = knowledge. It means more time spent posting. That's it.

Not saying either one does/does not know anything. BTW the one reference said it started at 150 mph. How many see that speed at the track or highway?
Old 05-10-2005, 08:42 AM
  #17  
10 Second Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Torkman15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 559
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by John_D.
Hilarious ain't it... Air flow at 100mph+ can't have any significant force on an unsupported piece of plastic.

SmokinHawk must have been dreaming when he wrote this:
(dang 3000 post newb's...)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=270127

And Chrispy too, on the second page of this post.
(heck he's only got nearly 9000 posts, he's still wet behind the ears.)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=239054
I dont think my "unsupported piece of plastic" will cave in because of the structural rigidity built into the piece due to the body lines. Kinda like a bridge not buckling in the middle, does this make any sense cuz I'm still wet behind the ears too. If I could figure out how to shift my 2000 M6 Camaro I wouldnt have to be content just running 10.70s @ 128 MPH 1.45 60ft.
Old 05-10-2005, 09:27 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
John_D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon TN
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I was looking for a picture I saw on here, but I can't find it. It's a Camaro (I think they would be worse than the TA/Firebird). It's not what I would call caved in. The peak/point in the very front is somewhat self-supporting, so it's not the front that gets pushed in. It's the large flat surface on top that gets smashed down. It's actually pretty flimsy when there's nothing under it. You can push it in with your hand easily. Sure it springs back up when you take the pressure off, but I'm still not too keen on it...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.