FAST 102 gains over ported LS3 intake in bolt-on 6.0L G8 - LS1TECH

Log In 


Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

FAST 102 gains over ported LS3 intake in bolt-on 6.0L G8

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2010, 08:43 AM   #1
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,236
Default FAST 102 gains over ported LS3 intake in bolt-on 6.0L G8

There has been so much speculation as to whether the FAST 102 would gain any power over a ported LS3 intake on a 6.0-6.2L engine with a stock long block, I decided to conduct my own scientific test. By scientific, I mean that only the manifold gains or losses alone would be shown.

We started off with a 2009 Pontiac G8 with a 6.0L L76 engine with AFM/DOD, stock 90mm throttle body, American Racing 1 7/8" headers with dual cats, Vararam Cold Air Intake, ASP UD pulley, Yella Terra 1.85 rockers, and Comp 26918 beehive valve springs (so we could have better valve control above 6000 rpm). Stock cam, stock torque converter. All runs were same day, same dyno. The manifold swap was performed on the dyno.

The red run featured a Stage 2 ported LS3 intake manifold by an LS1Tech sponsor. This combo was super-tuned for best overall power. The blue run is with the FAST 102. It too was super-tuned. As you can see, even with the mildest of engines available with an L92/LS3 head, the FAST 102 intake manifold gains nicely over the most expertly ported factory intake. If you were to add significant airflow from a camshaft or increase cubes, the gains would only be larger. Remember, this is the smallest, mildest motor that come with rectangular port heads.

For those who can't read the dyno sheet, the ported intake made 389.3rwhp/387.6rwtq. The FAST 102 made 393.7rwhp/390.6rwtq. Although the peak gains were only 4.4/4.0, the gains at other rpm were much higher.

Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 09:56 AM   #2
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
fastvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: !!!!TEXAS!!!!
Posts: 572
Default

So the fast wasnt Ported at all??
fastvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 10:03 AM   #3
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,966
Default

Thanks a lot for the comparison Patrick.

IMO those are very nice since you started with stg 2 ported stock intake.
I think you can get close 15rwhp if the stock intake wasnt ported what do you think??

I still can't believe some pepole didnt gain and some lost some power from 102Intake over stock LS3 intake.

Oh nice numbers from the car BTW.
venom ws7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 10:04 AM   #4
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
69LT1Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lapeer, MI
Posts: 2,314
Default

Thanks for doing these tests.

I know it was a week ago and the weather or whatever may be different but, you have no real gain from the thread about the header install.
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...p-388rwtq.html

Not criticizing, just curious.
69LT1Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 10:17 AM   #5
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69LT1Bird View Post
Thanks for doing these tests.

I know it was a week ago and the weather or whatever may be different but, you have no real gain from the thread about the header install.
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...p-388rwtq.html

Not criticizing, just curious.
Yes, different day, different weather, but same dyno. But even with that, here's the overlay of the stock intake vs the FAST 102. FAST intake is in red. Stock intake is in blue. The FAST just walks away from the stock intake at higher revs and this is with the wimpy stock AFM camshaft. The gains are over 20rwhp at 6200 rpm.


Last edited by Patrick G; 03-10-2010 at 02:47 PM. Reason: Stupid typo. Thanks to Marc 85Z28 for catching it, LOL.
Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 10:30 AM   #6
On The Tree
 
redsilv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: colorado
Posts: 140
Default

so much thanks for your posts patrick g
always informative to help me decide my 6.0 build
redsilv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 10:34 AM   #7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastvet View Post
So the fast wasnt Ported at all??
+1, Was the fast ported ?

Nice honest a-b comparison.
allngn_c5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 10:50 AM   #8
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,236
Default

FAST 102 intake was completely unported and bone stock.
Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 11:26 AM   #9
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 8,406
Default

I think if you went to a 102mm TB, it would show more power too. Nice comparison.
JakeFusion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 11:56 AM   #10
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,953
Default

Very nice comparison. It's too bad the baseline was lower as I was curious to see how the ported stock intake did against the unported stocker.
ScreaminRedZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 12:31 PM   #11
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminRedZ View Post
Very nice comparison. It's too bad the baseline was lower as I was curious to see how the ported stock intake did against the unported stocker.
Here's the overlay of the ported intake #2 vs an unported stocker. Although the ported intake carried the power better at higher rpm than stock, it did not make better peak power. This is the dicey thing about buying a hand ported anything. Some times you get a winner, some times you don't. Basically, I had one bad ported intake and one so-so ported intake. Without having the dyno as a reference, I would have never known that they lost power in certain places.

Blue graph is stock intake manifold.
Red graph is Stage 2 ported intake manifold.
Both were tuned for max power.

Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 02:40 PM   #12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick G View Post
The gains are over 20rwhp at 6200 rwhp.
I didn't know the G8 came with a Top Fuel engine option.
Marc 85Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 03:00 PM   #13
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,953
Default

Thanks for the info! That's the reason I want an untouched FAST when I get one rather thatn a ported one...you never really know who did the port work when you buy parts used.
ScreaminRedZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 03:19 PM   #14
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18360
Posts: 704
Default

what specs are on the G8 GT cam that its so wimpy? I know I read in another one of your threads the cam is very low lift.
zigroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 03:36 PM   #15
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zigroid View Post
what specs are on the G8 GT cam that its so wimpy? I know I read in another one of your threads the cam is very low lift.
It's something around 200/208 .479/.474" 116LSA. Pretty wimpy cam to make darn near 400 to the tires through an automatic transmission.
Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 06:25 PM   #16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick G View Post
FAST 102 intake was completely unported and bone stock.
Any thoughts on pulling that Manifold and porting it then strapping her back to the dyno ?

Great work as always !!
allngn_c5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 09:37 PM   #17
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18360
Posts: 704
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick G View Post
It's something around 200/208 .479/.474" 116LSA. Pretty wimpy cam to make darn near 400 to the tires through an automatic transmission.
its just so unbelievably impressive how a cam that size in a 6L engine can produce about 450 hp. I got a stock LS2 cam laying around, almost makes me want to skip the $1000 or so I'd spend on a new cam/valvetrain for my 6.0L LQ9 bottom end / LS3 top end build knowing I could probably get 400 rwhp out of it with bone stock driveability for so little money invested.
zigroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 09:51 PM   #18
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
RickClarke23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bishop,Texas
Posts: 201
Default

Well that really helps my decision Patrick to go ahead and plan on buying the fast for my combo in april. Maybe we could do a comparison on my ported LS3 to a fast in my car with your custom grind cam and a set of Richards WCCH stg 2 ported ls3's. We could do an N/A and Nitrous compare
RickClarke23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 12:29 PM   #19
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
LS1 SPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Schaumburg,IL
Posts: 4,959
Default

Patrick

nice results and thanks for sharing
LS1 SPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 12:50 PM   #20
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 53
Default

great work but is less then 5 hp worth the money?? I could find somewhere else to use the money for more horse power...
billy.johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LS2 102mm FAST dyno test studderin Dynamometer Results & Comparisons 11 05-18-2012 12:42 AM
L92 heads off, AFR 230 V2 heads on, 504rwhp 6.0L automatic! (now with track results). Patrick G Dynamometer Results & Comparisons 232 02-12-2011 02:05 PM
Stage 2 ported LS2 intake manifold-Formato fasteddyss Parts Classifieds 2 02-07-2011 12:57 PM
L92 heads off, AFR 230 V2 heads on, 504rwhp 6.0L automatic! Patrick G Generation III Internal Engine 48 10-07-2010 01:52 PM
FAST 102 gains over ported LS3 intake in bolt-on 6.0L G8 Patrick G Generation IV External Engine 36 04-17-2010 03:01 AM


Tags
102, 60, 62, dyno, efi, factory, fast, g8, gains, hp, intake, ls3, manifold, ported, srt8, tb

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 AM.