Bolt Ons dyno-graph
11-04-2004, 02:26 PM
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bolt Ons dyno-graph I dynoed about 2 weeks ago and I'm just now getting around to posting it. I'm pleased considering my car only has intake/exhaust and the clutch was slipping badly.
This is with the following mods:
Hooker Long Tube Headers
TSP True Duals
MTI Clear Lid
Stock 10 Bolt and stock 3.42 gears
On the Superflow Dyno it made 345 rwhp and 356 rwtq STP corrected.
Dynojet Horsepower is 364 rwhp and 375 rwtq.
I'll be sure and post my results after I install my FM15 cam this December.
This is with the following mods:
Hooker Long Tube Headers
TSP True Duals
MTI Clear Lid
Stock 10 Bolt and stock 3.42 gears
On the Superflow Dyno it made 345 rwhp and 356 rwtq STP corrected.
Dynojet Horsepower is 364 rwhp and 375 rwtq.
I'll be sure and post my results after I install my FM15 cam this December.
11-10-2004, 12:55 PM
#3
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nevada, TX
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If those transitive numbers to the dynojet are accurate, thats not impressive its sick! Especially the torque. I am curious what that car is going to hit after the cam.
Keep us updated
Brandon
Keep us updated
Brandon
11-10-2004, 02:37 PM
#4
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
If those dynojet #'s are correct thats very impressive for the mods you have. Thats with stock unported TB and MAF right? I'm assuming thats tuned right?
11-10-2004, 02:52 PM
#5
That is the highest dyno I have ever seen with your mods. My 2000 vette did 327hp and 321tq with TPIS headers and vararam through 3:73 and Yank 2800 and I thought that was good. Those are sick numbers and good track times to back it up. You are going to be very close or at 400HP when the cam goes in. Do an underdrive pulley and you will be at 405-415. Good luck.............NICE!
11-10-2004, 03:25 PM
#6
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nevada, TX
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ccajun4real
That is the highest dyno I have ever seen with your mods. My 2000 vette did 327hp and 321tq with TPIS headers and vararam through 3:73 and Yank 2800 and I thought that was good. Those are sick numbers and good track times to back it up. You are going to be very close or at 400HP when the cam goes in. Do an underdrive pulley and you will be at 405-415. Good luck.............NICE!
Brandon
Trending Topics
11-10-2004, 04:17 PM
#9
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
Yeah I have never heard of any fbodies getting the LS6 heads from the factory, only the block which adds no power, just strength
Graph?I'd have to argue the better crank passages would make a SMALL difference
11-10-2004, 04:29 PM
#10
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nevada, TX
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 777
yeah since the ls6 block makes a difference 
i don't think any f-body's came with ls6 heads..if that is what you are reffering to
i don't think any f-body's came with ls6 heads..if that is what you are reffering toJOKE, like HA HA.
Brandon
11-12-2004, 03:42 PM
#11
Dont roll your eyes at me jackass. I was making a joke. Saying someone stuffed a complete LS6 MOTOR not BLOCK. I realize the difference.
JOKE, like HA HA.
Brandon
JOKE, like HA HA.
Brandon
...i wasn't the only one who thought it wasn't a joke...it would have been easier to just say that you were making a joke instead of calling people names...
11-12-2004, 04:23 PM
#12
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SDC
Nice numbers, did you have it dyno'd on a dynojet or just make up those? Graph?
I'd have to argue the better crank passages would make a SMALL difference
Graph?I'd have to argue the better crank passages would make a SMALL difference
11-12-2004, 11:46 PM
#13
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas (Bush/Tollway)
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
good numbers. you should definitely get a ported maf and a tune.. .the tune alone will give you 10hp.
just wondering if you like the true duals thinking about getting them
just wondering if you like the true duals thinking about getting them
11-13-2004, 11:16 AM
#14
Originally Posted by SDC
Nice numbers, did you have it dyno'd on a dynojet or just make up those? Graph?
I'd have to argue the better crank passages would make a SMALL difference
Graph?I'd have to argue the better crank passages would make a SMALL difference
How you may ask?
Well, they compete with in a race division where the cars they race must dyno under a maximum RWHP as read by the Dynojet that's at these races.
Therefore, this shop uses their dyno above and has figured out the correct correction factors so that when they race they won't be disqualified b/c they know, based on their correction factors, that they will be on par with the DynoJet that they'll have to be tested on so they won't be disqualified.
11-13-2004, 11:20 AM
#15
Here's what the shop owner said about the dyno and their correction factor that they use:
The DJ number is simply a number that SuperFlow, MD and the industry in general has applied to historical DJ results. DJ are generally 3 to 5 % higher than other STP/SAE corrected numbers. I don't have a DJ, so all I can go by is what we were given and what most all of our customers have seen.
We have worked on NASA sanctioned race cars and they all get dyno'ed at the track after a podium finish since their rules call for a max power to weight ratio.
We have seen the same results. IE. A 340hp STP car develope 350+ on the DJ at the track with similar temps, etc. Thus when tuning (or ballasting) a NASA car here we have to utilize those estimates to keep the car legal.
The DJ number is simply a number that SuperFlow, MD and the industry in general has applied to historical DJ results. DJ are generally 3 to 5 % higher than other STP/SAE corrected numbers. I don't have a DJ, so all I can go by is what we were given and what most all of our customers have seen.
We have worked on NASA sanctioned race cars and they all get dyno'ed at the track after a podium finish since their rules call for a max power to weight ratio.
We have seen the same results. IE. A 340hp STP car develope 350+ on the DJ at the track with similar temps, etc. Thus when tuning (or ballasting) a NASA car here we have to utilize those estimates to keep the car legal.
11-14-2004, 11:30 PM
#17
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dubs6
good numbers. you should definitely get a ported maf and a tune.. .the tune alone will give you 10hp.
just wondering if you like the true duals thinking about getting them
just wondering if you like the true duals thinking about getting them
12-10-2004, 01:57 PM
#20
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LS1Maniac
That dyno is with the stock TB and MAF. I just installed a Shaner TB last week however. That is also on the stock tune. I couldn't ask for a better A/F ratio and I'm rather impressed the stock computer managed my mods so well.