Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

TSP231/237: Old Cam-only, part bolt-on dyno vs. H/C/Full bolt-on dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2005, 12:15 PM
  #1  
!LS1 11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default TSP231/237: Old Cam-only, part bolt-on dyno vs. H/C/Full bolt-on dyno

*Same Dyno*
Old setup (Oct. 2003): TSP 231/237, SLP LT's, cutout, pulley, stock TB, 4.11's
New setup (yesterday): Same cam, see sig for rest. (Full bolt-ons, FAST 90, dual cutouts wer the newest items... heads have been on the car for a year), 4.11's

They did not take the engine past 6000 rpm yesterday, but the overlay is interesting to see regardless. Cutouts were closed for yesterday's run.




Last edited by SouthFL.02.SS; 03-12-2005 at 01:48 PM.
Old 03-12-2005, 12:50 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (51)
 
30th t/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 3,097
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

thats still awesome. but how did they come up with 468?
Old 03-12-2005, 01:00 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
RaNsOm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upper Marlboro, MD
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 30th t/a
thats still awesome. but how did they come up with 468?
looks like 448 to me
Old 03-12-2005, 01:01 PM
  #4  
Teching In
 
SSslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

great numbers.. congrats.. how do you like the TPS cams
Old 03-12-2005, 01:02 PM
  #5  
!LS1 11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 30th t/a
thats still awesome. but how did they come up with 468?
They told me that was the open cutout pull, which they did not log and give to me. I can't say I have the best communication with this shop, as they did not know the rev limiter, plus they did not provide me with the A/F ratio (the primary reason for my dyno pull request). They also do not provide tq numbers on their logs. Info was sketchy at best, and I never got a clear view of the 468rwhp pull they claimed to have put down (they called me on my cell with much excitement about it, but I never saw the proof ).

Next week's retune session and dyno pulls at the tuning shop (another place, where I got my 425rwhp H/C baseline - pre FAST90/QTP HVM LT's) will be the true test/comparo to see how the FAST90 and QTP HVM's improved over the SLP LT's and LS6.

Last edited by SouthFL.02.SS; 03-12-2005 at 01:07 PM.
Old 03-12-2005, 01:05 PM
  #6  
!LS1 11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSslow
great numbers.. congrats.. how do you like the TPS cams
The TSP231/237 always pulled very hard up top.
The FAST90 and QTP HVM LT's did lots to bring some useable power to the low and mid rpm rev range. The cam no longer feels like a dog down low. In fact, it pulls hard everywhere now.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.