TSP231/237: Old Cam-only, part bolt-on dyno vs. H/C/Full bolt-on dyno
#1
TSP231/237: Old Cam-only, part bolt-on dyno vs. H/C/Full bolt-on dyno
*Same Dyno*
Old setup (Oct. 2003): TSP 231/237, SLP LT's, cutout, pulley, stock TB, 4.11's
New setup (yesterday): Same cam, see sig for rest. (Full bolt-ons, FAST 90, dual cutouts wer the newest items... heads have been on the car for a year), 4.11's
They did not take the engine past 6000 rpm yesterday, but the overlay is interesting to see regardless. Cutouts were closed for yesterday's run.
Old setup (Oct. 2003): TSP 231/237, SLP LT's, cutout, pulley, stock TB, 4.11's
New setup (yesterday): Same cam, see sig for rest. (Full bolt-ons, FAST 90, dual cutouts wer the newest items... heads have been on the car for a year), 4.11's
They did not take the engine past 6000 rpm yesterday, but the overlay is interesting to see regardless. Cutouts were closed for yesterday's run.
Last edited by SouthFL.02.SS; 03-12-2005 at 02:48 PM.
#5
Originally Posted by 30th t/a
thats still awesome. but how did they come up with 468?
Next week's retune session and dyno pulls at the tuning shop (another place, where I got my 425rwhp H/C baseline - pre FAST90/QTP HVM LT's) will be the true test/comparo to see how the FAST90 and QTP HVM's improved over the SLP LT's and LS6.
Last edited by SouthFL.02.SS; 03-12-2005 at 02:07 PM.
#6
Originally Posted by SSslow
great numbers.. congrats.. how do you like the TPS cams
The FAST90 and QTP HVM LT's did lots to bring some useable power to the low and mid rpm rev range. The cam no longer feels like a dog down low. In fact, it pulls hard everywhere now.