Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

TSP231/237: Old Cam-only, part bolt-on dyno vs. H/C/Full bolt-on dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2005 | 01:15 PM
  #1  
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,133
Likes: 2
From: Miami
Default TSP231/237: Old Cam-only, part bolt-on dyno vs. H/C/Full bolt-on dyno

*Same Dyno*
Old setup (Oct. 2003): TSP 231/237, SLP LT's, cutout, pulley, stock TB, 4.11's
New setup (yesterday): Same cam, see sig for rest. (Full bolt-ons, FAST 90, dual cutouts wer the newest items... heads have been on the car for a year), 4.11's

They did not take the engine past 6000 rpm yesterday, but the overlay is interesting to see regardless. Cutouts were closed for yesterday's run.




Last edited by SouthFL.02.SS; 03-12-2005 at 02:48 PM.
Old 03-12-2005 | 01:50 PM
  #2  
30th t/a's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,104
Likes: 17
From: Butler, PA
Default

thats still awesome. but how did they come up with 468?
Old 03-12-2005 | 02:00 PM
  #3  
RaNsOm's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
From: Upper Marlboro, MD
Default

Originally Posted by 30th t/a
thats still awesome. but how did they come up with 468?
looks like 448 to me
Old 03-12-2005 | 02:01 PM
  #4  
SSslow's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

great numbers.. congrats.. how do you like the TPS cams
Old 03-12-2005 | 02:02 PM
  #5  
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,133
Likes: 2
From: Miami
Default

Originally Posted by 30th t/a
thats still awesome. but how did they come up with 468?
They told me that was the open cutout pull, which they did not log and give to me. I can't say I have the best communication with this shop, as they did not know the rev limiter, plus they did not provide me with the A/F ratio (the primary reason for my dyno pull request). They also do not provide tq numbers on their logs. Info was sketchy at best, and I never got a clear view of the 468rwhp pull they claimed to have put down (they called me on my cell with much excitement about it, but I never saw the proof ).

Next week's retune session and dyno pulls at the tuning shop (another place, where I got my 425rwhp H/C baseline - pre FAST90/QTP HVM LT's) will be the true test/comparo to see how the FAST90 and QTP HVM's improved over the SLP LT's and LS6.

Last edited by SouthFL.02.SS; 03-12-2005 at 02:07 PM.
Old 03-12-2005 | 02:05 PM
  #6  
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,133
Likes: 2
From: Miami
Default

Originally Posted by SSslow
great numbers.. congrats.. how do you like the TPS cams
The TSP231/237 always pulled very hard up top.
The FAST90 and QTP HVM LT's did lots to bring some useable power to the low and mid rpm rev range. The cam no longer feels like a dog down low. In fact, it pulls hard everywhere now.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 PM.