Limitations of 3" Downpipe?
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Limitations of 3" Downpipe?
Hey guys, the search function doesn't like the number 3 and just returns every thread with the word downpipe or dp in it, so I figured I'd just ask what you all think, and risk being abused for not searching. Haha...
I'm getting close to starting a turbo project on a small displacement V8, that I just can't see how to fit bigger than a 3" downpipe. Once I get down past the firewall I can run 3.5" or maybe even 4" the rest of the way back. Currently I'm planning 3.5".
I'm also planning to recirculate the wastegate dump, and I'm not sure yet if I'll be able to run that tube separately back to where the diameter goes up to 3.5" or not.
So with all that in mind, what do you all feel are the limitations of 3" downpipe, both with and without the WG dump recirced.
Thanks!
I'm getting close to starting a turbo project on a small displacement V8, that I just can't see how to fit bigger than a 3" downpipe. Once I get down past the firewall I can run 3.5" or maybe even 4" the rest of the way back. Currently I'm planning 3.5".
I'm also planning to recirculate the wastegate dump, and I'm not sure yet if I'll be able to run that tube separately back to where the diameter goes up to 3.5" or not.
So with all that in mind, what do you all feel are the limitations of 3" downpipe, both with and without the WG dump recirced.
Thanks!
#7
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys!
Can I assume all of these experiences were with open WG dumps to the atmosphere, or were any of them recirc'd back into the 3" downpipe? I'm guessing that is where the problem might really become apparent...
Can I assume all of these experiences were with open WG dumps to the atmosphere, or were any of them recirc'd back into the 3" downpipe? I'm guessing that is where the problem might really become apparent...
Trending Topics
#8
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Last time I was on a dyno it made 780whp but that was a while ago and i've been tweaking the tune since. I was pushing 22psi but I wasn't much faster over 18psi so I suspect I was choking on backpressure. Went with a bigger turbo and 4" downpipe but it was a bitch to get the pipe to fit.
#10
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this definitely assuming an external dump (or separate tube to a larger part of the exhaust) for the wastegate, or am I mistaken about that?
#14
#15
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
Yup, dump it to atmosphere with that small of a downpipe/exhaust as a 3" downpipe will be a restriction. I currently have a 3" downpipe on my Camaro and really really wish I could make it bigger but with the kmember being in the way with my setup I can't. Either way with that limitation my car has still run a 9.17 @ 152 mph on a stock cube LS1 with an older 76GTS which is really similar to the 7675. Heck at some point I may try to switch out k-members to a more turbo friendly one and redo the downpipe but that's just more money I don't want to spend.
#17
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys!
NicD, just making sure I understand 100%, you're WG is being dumped, right? That's already amazing that you can run that kind of trap with a single 3". Great info!
So since I REALLY don't want an atmo dump on this car, I will look into running a parallel 1.75" or 2" tube run for the WG back to where I can jump up to 3.5" exhaust. Should be just behind the bottom of the firewall. I think at the power level I will be at (probably never reach 600wheel), it should be okay to recirc the wastegate gasses into the 3.5."
Thoughts on that?
NicD, just making sure I understand 100%, you're WG is being dumped, right? That's already amazing that you can run that kind of trap with a single 3". Great info!
So since I REALLY don't want an atmo dump on this car, I will look into running a parallel 1.75" or 2" tube run for the WG back to where I can jump up to 3.5" exhaust. Should be just behind the bottom of the firewall. I think at the power level I will be at (probably never reach 600wheel), it should be okay to recirc the wastegate gasses into the 3.5."
Thoughts on that?
#19
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
NicD, just making sure I understand 100%, you're WG is being dumped, right? That's already amazing that you can run that kind of trap with a single 3". Great info!
So since I REALLY don't want an atmo dump on this car, I will look into running a parallel 1.75" or 2" tube run for the WG back to where I can jump up to 3.5" exhaust. Should be just behind the bottom of the firewall. I think at the power level I will be at (probably never reach 600wheel), it should be okay to recirc the wastegate gasses into the 3.5."
Thoughts on that?
So since I REALLY don't want an atmo dump on this car, I will look into running a parallel 1.75" or 2" tube run for the WG back to where I can jump up to 3.5" exhaust. Should be just behind the bottom of the firewall. I think at the power level I will be at (probably never reach 600wheel), it should be okay to recirc the wastegate gasses into the 3.5."
Thoughts on that?
Honestly for under 600 rwhp it's really not going to make much of a difference IMO. I think running a parallel 2" tube running from the WG to the back where it can flare to a 3.5" pipe would work well at 600 rwhp.