Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

T6 1.32 s475 on 346 m6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2016, 01:00 AM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BrownMagic
Yeah from what I've seen there is definitely a lot of mixed opinions on turbo sizing.. To be honest I just want something that can make good power and have some room to grow. I didn't think going t4 would make too much of a difference for my goal.. Just wanted to make sure it wasent too small of a turbo
The 472 is enough turbo to put a silverado ss in the 10s. Wrap your head around that and extrapolate to the weight of your car.

I was able to go 10.82@130 with a 475/83/1.0 t4 weighing 5045.
Old 08-29-2016, 03:21 PM
  #22  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
BrownMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: British columbia
Posts: 29
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
The 472 is enough turbo to put a silverado ss in the 10s. Wrap your head around that and extrapolate to the weight of your car.

I was able to go 10.82@130 with a 475/83/1.0 t4 weighing 5045.
That's exactly what I wanted to hear
Old 08-29-2016, 03:28 PM
  #23  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
BrownMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: British columbia
Posts: 29
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What size hot side piping would you guys suggest for this setup? 2.25 ID?

Here is what I have come up with so far, just about done fabbing up the brace for the turbo so next I'll be ordering stainless pipe and v bands for the hot side.. Not much space to work with on these cars

Name:  20160828_213005_zpsuwczsiaf.jpg
Views: 482
Size:  218.9 KB



Quick Reply: T6 1.32 s475 on 346 m6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.