Twin turbo options for LQ4 in late model nascar chassis for road course/standing mile
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Twin turbo options for LQ4 in late model nascar chassis for road course/standing mile
I am building a late model nascar chassis to run a mariad of events including: local drags, standing miles, local road course, silver state classic and the long course at Bonneville.
I realize that there will be tradeoffs due to the different conditions on each course but I am looking for a pair of turbos that will have enough response to get out of the turns as well as enough top end to pull top gear to 7k. I'll have a custom cam and ported 317 heads and 9.5:1 cr running 110 octane and air to air intercooler, fast 92 intake and open tubular exhaust. I would like to see 800-1200HP.
I like the V-band turbine housings, billet wheels and ball bearings but none are required.
I realize that there will be tradeoffs due to the different conditions on each course but I am looking for a pair of turbos that will have enough response to get out of the turns as well as enough top end to pull top gear to 7k. I'll have a custom cam and ported 317 heads and 9.5:1 cr running 110 octane and air to air intercooler, fast 92 intake and open tubular exhaust. I would like to see 800-1200HP.
I like the V-band turbine housings, billet wheels and ball bearings but none are required.
#2
9 Second Club
It's a modest power goal, a pair of SXE362's or 364's would easily get you there.
eg
http://www.agpturbo.com/borg-warner-...8-13009097008/
I wouldnt even see any need to use the larger 73mm turbine wheel. I've 364's on mine and do everything you're asking, albeit I only use pump+meth and a slightly lower CR.
TFS heads though.
If budget permitted you could go for something similar in BB, eg a Precision 6466 or 6266.
I just didnt see any gains being worth the extra cost. And when racing as rpm's would always be over 4500-5000rpm anyway...spool has never been a problem for me with any usage. Yes it could be better here and there but it';s never been anything that pushed me to change anything on the car to improve it.
Almost the opposite...actually just got a pair of larger turbine housings to try to see how it affects things.
The little hole in the 0.88 always annoyed me lol, even if pressure ratios are always around 1:1 anyway
The new 0.96 seem huge by comparison, but wont be fitting them until the winter
eg
http://www.agpturbo.com/borg-warner-...8-13009097008/
I wouldnt even see any need to use the larger 73mm turbine wheel. I've 364's on mine and do everything you're asking, albeit I only use pump+meth and a slightly lower CR.
TFS heads though.
If budget permitted you could go for something similar in BB, eg a Precision 6466 or 6266.
I just didnt see any gains being worth the extra cost. And when racing as rpm's would always be over 4500-5000rpm anyway...spool has never been a problem for me with any usage. Yes it could be better here and there but it';s never been anything that pushed me to change anything on the car to improve it.
Almost the opposite...actually just got a pair of larger turbine housings to try to see how it affects things.
The little hole in the 0.88 always annoyed me lol, even if pressure ratios are always around 1:1 anyway
The new 0.96 seem huge by comparison, but wont be fitting them until the winter
#3
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info!
I can't seem to find any with a v-band on the turbine inlet. I'm surprised they are not an option for a lot of these racing type units. Seems like it would be cheaper to manufacture too.
I can't seem to find any with a v-band on the turbine inlet. I'm surprised they are not an option for a lot of these racing type units. Seems like it would be cheaper to manufacture too.
#4
9 Second Club
Someone out there might make a v-band housing, but unless packaging reasons really dictate you need one, it is more of a novelty.
If it was really essential Bullseye make a 1.0 v-band for an S300
http://www.bullseyepowerstore.com/pr...0-628b1f511565
If it was really essential Bullseye make a 1.0 v-band for an S300
http://www.bullseyepowerstore.com/pr...0-628b1f511565
#5
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Someone out there might make a v-band housing, but unless packaging reasons really dictate you need one, it is more of a novelty.
If it was really essential Bullseye make a 1.0 v-band for an S300
http://www.bullseyepowerstore.com/pr...0-628b1f511565
If it was really essential Bullseye make a 1.0 v-band for an S300
http://www.bullseyepowerstore.com/pr...0-628b1f511565
Trending Topics
#8
9 Second Club
For an extra few hundred, I'd just go for the billet wheel version. Overall it's a better unit, will flow more spool same and has better bearings etc inside
http://www.agpturbo.com/borg-warner-...-68-billet-62/
The 362 would also have a slightly smaller compressor cover, if space is an issue
http://www.agpturbo.com/borg-warner-...-68-billet-62/
The 362 would also have a slightly smaller compressor cover, if space is an issue
#10
AGP recommend two of these for me.
800whp. I'm building a 388. 4.125" bore. 3.622" stroke. road car/standing mile.
http://www.agpturbo.com/borg-warner-...-turbocharger/
with the .82 v band exhaust housing.
You're going to give up some performance on the B-ville long course to satisfy your other goals. The long course seems to be all about 100+mm single turbos.
800whp. I'm building a 388. 4.125" bore. 3.622" stroke. road car/standing mile.
http://www.agpturbo.com/borg-warner-...-turbocharger/
with the .82 v band exhaust housing.
You're going to give up some performance on the B-ville long course to satisfy your other goals. The long course seems to be all about 100+mm single turbos.
#11
9 Second Club
I'm sure those will easily make 800.
And agree..if the car will see a lot of long duration stuff, I would definitely aim a little bigger for the turbos just so they arent pushed so hard.
1/4 mile is easy, 1/2 a little less...mile is much harder on an engine, but some of that big stuff you maybe to 2-3 miles ? maybe more ? That's potentially a lot more heat etc if you were pushing the compressor hard.
As for single vs twins...really just down to packaging I'd say. Some say a single is more efficient for top end stuff...I really doubt there is much difference if the units are correctly sized for the job in hand.
And agree..if the car will see a lot of long duration stuff, I would definitely aim a little bigger for the turbos just so they arent pushed so hard.
1/4 mile is easy, 1/2 a little less...mile is much harder on an engine, but some of that big stuff you maybe to 2-3 miles ? maybe more ? That's potentially a lot more heat etc if you were pushing the compressor hard.
As for single vs twins...really just down to packaging I'd say. Some say a single is more efficient for top end stuff...I really doubt there is much difference if the units are correctly sized for the job in hand.
#12
the big course is 10 miles IIRC.
also- something light and agile on the road course is far from fun on the salt. On the salt it can't be heavy enough and the turbo can't be too big.
are you planning to use bolt on plate weight or something? If that's what it is be mindful of them coming loose in a wreck.
also- something light and agile on the road course is far from fun on the salt. On the salt it can't be heavy enough and the turbo can't be too big.
are you planning to use bolt on plate weight or something? If that's what it is be mindful of them coming loose in a wreck.
#13
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the big course is 10 miles IIRC.
also- something light and agile on the road course is far from fun on the salt. On the salt it can't be heavy enough and the turbo can't be too big.
are you planning to use bolt on plate weight or something? If that's what it is be mindful of them coming loose in a wreck.
also- something light and agile on the road course is far from fun on the salt. On the salt it can't be heavy enough and the turbo can't be too big.
are you planning to use bolt on plate weight or something? If that's what it is be mindful of them coming loose in a wreck.
#14
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am expecting to run the s300's with .88 housings as an almost one size fits all. I'll probably swap housings around to match the course and diff ratios. Does this sound like a good plan?
#15
9 Second Club
Even within that housing there are 2 turbine options, 68 and 73mm.
I doubt you'd go wrong with any of those in the SXE versions though. For the long duration stuff...the alrger turbine might be nicer to have, but it's bound to hurt spool a little if there is any tight slower speed stuff. Whether it's really an issue or not...would be up to you.
I've a pair of the 364FMW's on my 383 with the 68mm turbines. And TBH I really cant fault them. Although I have bought a pair of larger 0.96 turbine housings to try.
I do not have any backpressure issues at all, in fact it's excellent...but the hole inside the 0.88 housing is tiny ! and just something that bugged me. I only recently seen there are larger housings available, so bought a pair. Wont be fitting til over the winter though
I doubt you'd go wrong with any of those in the SXE versions though. For the long duration stuff...the alrger turbine might be nicer to have, but it's bound to hurt spool a little if there is any tight slower speed stuff. Whether it's really an issue or not...would be up to you.
I've a pair of the 364FMW's on my 383 with the 68mm turbines. And TBH I really cant fault them. Although I have bought a pair of larger 0.96 turbine housings to try.
I do not have any backpressure issues at all, in fact it's excellent...but the hole inside the 0.88 housing is tiny ! and just something that bugged me. I only recently seen there are larger housings available, so bought a pair. Wont be fitting til over the winter though
#19
9 Second Club
Standard 366SXE has the 73mm turbine ?
Given small price difference...why choose the older unit vs the SXE ?
What does an aftermarket 66mm no brand wheel offer using a standard S300 core vs the SXE factory billet wheel with their heavy duty bearings etc ?
Given small price difference...why choose the older unit vs the SXE ?
What does an aftermarket 66mm no brand wheel offer using a standard S300 core vs the SXE factory billet wheel with their heavy duty bearings etc ?
#20
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pardon my ignorance but when I research the s300 series, I don't see the models broken down into 362, 364, etc. I just see columns of s300's with the wheel dimensions, etc.
What am I missing?
What am I missing?