Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Stock engine and Procharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2007, 10:26 AM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
white01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 656
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default Stock engine and Procharger

I'm currently getting a SDCE D1SC 7-9 psi kit put on my Camaro that still has a stock engine. I've read that the APS TT kit recommends stiffer valve springs, why is that and why doesn't the same recommendation apply to a supercharged car that's making the same amount of boost as the TT?

My goal is a safe and reliable 500 rwhp for a few years, then an engine rebuild and up the boost for 650 rwhp.
Old 12-14-2007, 11:26 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
98turbls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central Oklahoma
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It actually is recommended... I'm changing mine right now because I'm worried about floating a valve.. If you've seen the stock springs you'd want to change them just because...
Old 12-14-2007, 12:22 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
white01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 656
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default To spring or not to spring - that is the question

Originally Posted by 98turbls1
It actually is recommended... I'm changing mine right now because I'm worried about floating a valve.. If you've seen the stock springs you'd want to change them just because...
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/821215-d1sc-procharger-exoticperformance.html

This thread says it is recommended in the sticky, then master Bob says this:

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
Yes, you should have no problems with 8lbs of boost. We installed an ATI ProCharger D-1SC on my '99Z28 when it had 110,000 miles on the internally untouched engine. My car is in my project car section of my website. The engine held up just fine, stock valvesprings and all. Bob
Is it just one of those things that you should do just to be on the "safe" side? I don't want to throw away money on this engine since I have plans to rebuild it later on.
Old 12-14-2007, 12:31 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
sworaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by white01ss
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=821215

This thread says it is recommended in the sticky, then master Bob says this:



Is it just one of those things that you should do just to be on the "safe" side? I don't want to throw away money on this engine since I have plans to rebuild it later on.
I believe changing the springs is highly recommended so you can get the best performance out of your supercharger build. If you want to sacrifice some hp and push the stock valvetrain farther than it was intended then that's up to you. It will still make some great power but probably not as much as the same set up on a car with some better springs. (All my opinion)
Old 12-14-2007, 01:44 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
my01ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If your going to rebuild the engine later you can re-use the better valve springs.
Old 12-14-2007, 03:03 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
white01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 656
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by my01ws6
If your going to rebuild the engine later you can re-use the better valve springs.

That's a good point. But I have to ask would you put 2 yr old valve springs into a brand new $8k motor? I'm not going to rev the crap out of it as I normally shift around 5800 so I should be alright not changing them. I was just wondering if there were any horror stories out there that would change my mind. If Bob says I shouldn't worry about it then it should be fine.
I'm more worried about grenading my stock 10-bolt.
Old 12-14-2007, 08:41 PM
  #7  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

We've only had one car that we truly had problems with the stock valvesprings. We had installed an ATI ProCharger D-1SC on a customer's T/A, who regularly beat the snot out of this car. He brought the car in to us with an engine misfire, we did all the common things first. Replaced spark plugs, wires, swapped coils around. Sometimes the misfire would change cylinders! It turned out to be totally shot valvesprings, we pulled them out and put them on a plate of glass, and they were all at different heights. This car had 36,000 miles on it, and the guy (he's now in prison) apparently would hit first instead of third every now and then. We've never had one of these cars drop a valve, never. Bob
Old 12-14-2007, 10:22 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Part of the reason better valve springs are recommended is because you are applying whatever boost pressure you run to the entire intake system, including the back (top side) of the intake valves. If you do the math, the area of the top side of the valve is roughly around 3 square inches. Apply 10 psi to that and you now have 30 lbs trying to open that valve when it is seated.
Old 12-15-2007, 10:27 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Schantin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
We've only had one car that we truly had problems with the stock valvesprings. We had installed an ATI ProCharger D-1SC on a customer's T/A, who regularly beat the snot out of this car. He brought the car in to us with an engine misfire, we did all the common things first. Replaced spark plugs, wires, swapped coils around. Sometimes the misfire would change cylinders! It turned out to be totally shot valvesprings, we pulled them out and put them on a plate of glass, and they were all at different heights. This car had 36,000 miles on it, and the guy (he's now in prison) apparently would hit first instead of third every now and then. We've never had one of these cars drop a valve, never. Bob
Guess it's a crime to beat valvesprings to death.....

Sorry, couldn't resist
Old 12-15-2007, 11:38 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
white01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 656
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99ssleeper
Part of the reason better valve springs are recommended is because you are applying whatever boost pressure you run to the entire intake system, including the back (top side) of the intake valves. If you do the math, the area of the top side of the valve is roughly around 3 square inches. Apply 10 psi to that and you now have 30 lbs trying to open that valve when it is seated.
Thanks for the explanation, sleeper, that makes a lot of sense... So to counteract the 30 lbs. of open force, the valve train needs springs that have 30 lbs more seat pressure than the cam needs when used NA. I guess there could be some valve float at high RPMs without changing springs, which could manifest itself as some loss of power.

Bob, it's good to know that you haven't seen engine damage for not doing springs. I admit that I've also hit 1st going to 3rd a few times in my car's 30k miles. Now with 7-9 psi of boost (don't know yet) I would imagine the gears are going to wrap out that much faster, making it harder to hit the shifts perfectly every time. The car will see some track duty for sure when Ennis opens back up in the spring.
Old 12-20-2007, 04:48 AM
  #11  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by white01ss
Thanks for the explanation, sleeper, that makes a lot of sense... So to counteract the 30 lbs. of open force, the valve train needs springs that have 30 lbs more seat pressure than the cam needs when used NA. I guess there could be some valve float at high RPMs without changing springs, which could manifest itself as some loss of power.

Bob, it's good to know that you haven't seen engine damage for not doing springs. I admit that I've also hit 1st going to 3rd a few times in my car's 30k miles. Now with 7-9 psi of boost (don't know yet) I would imagine the gears are going to wrap out that much faster, making it harder to hit the shifts perfectly every time. The car will see some track duty for sure when Ennis opens back up in the spring.
Usually during the 1st instead of 3rd experience, the stock pushrods will be the part that bends when the engine mechanically over revs. You're right, the car is going to rev a whole lot faster. You will be hitting 2nd gear a whole lot sooner than you are use to. Bob




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.