Gen 5 Camaro Power-Adder Tech Supercharger, Turbo, Nitrous

REAL World Experience "SUPERCHARGER VS TURBO"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2014, 04:28 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
ls427ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default REAL World Experience "SUPERCHARGER VS TURBO"

I have supercharged and twin turbo cars.
the twin turbo cars I have are a Bentley continental flying spur and a bmw 7 series.
the supercharged cars are a vortech gen 5 Camaro and a 671 blower prostreet car.
some things I have experienced:
supercharged cars have instant response.
turbo's do have disgusting lag.
I have driven my brother in law's stock buick that has a supercharger and it too had instant response.
since most of my driving is street driving I prefer the supercharged instant response over the turbo lag.
I find the turbo lag disgusting.
what are your thoughts?

Last edited by ls427ray; 07-31-2014 at 04:36 PM.
Old 07-31-2014, 04:31 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I totally agree with that, and personally I prefer a twin screw type blower for a street car
Old 07-31-2014, 05:43 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
DEFYANT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Okmulgee, OK
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm a turbo guy all the way. My current car has a rather small turbo (MHI 14B), and spools like a freight train and pulls cleanly to 8000RPM. The GTP I had was... Fun I guess, but it wasn't as fun as my current car. My Foxbody will be turbo as well. IMHO, a turbo is easier to manage power wise, they are more efficient (properly sized), and whoever says that they are hard to get right is an idiot. My brother in law had a 03 Cobra with a Kenne Bell 2.8H that made 750whp on E85, and don't get me wrong, it was extremely fun, but was too much too fast.
Old 07-31-2014, 06:02 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls427ray
I have supercharged and twin turbo cars.
the twin turbo cars I have are a Bentley continental flying spur and a bmw 7 series.
the supercharged cars are a vortech gen 5 Camaro and a 671 blower prostreet car.
some things I have experienced:
supercharged cars have instant response.
turbo's do have disgusting lag.
I have driven my brother in law's stock buick that has a supercharger and it too had instant response.
since most of my driving is street driving I prefer the supercharged instant response over the turbo lag.
I find the turbo lag disgusting.
what are your thoughts?
A 150 shot gets rid of that boost
Old 08-01-2014, 06:57 AM
  #5  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I prefer supercharged for street cars and turbo for mostly track cars.
Old 08-01-2014, 10:20 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (17)
 
ss performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have had several turbo Buick Grand Nationals and loved them all.

However on a street car the turbo lag can be a problem. Several times I almost had wrecks because the turbo lag would spool in at an inopportune time. Definitely took constant attention to avoid problems.

But as a matter of which is best is a chocolate or vanilla issue. Some like one others the other. Neither is right or wrong, it's a matter of what you prefer.

Go out have fun and be safe.
Old 08-06-2014, 03:54 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
BullF-16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is this lag you speak of? I have not noticed it?????? LOL



Quick Reply: REAL World Experience "SUPERCHARGER VS TURBO"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.