More accurate O2 sensor than stock?
11-23-2010, 01:07 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More accurate O2 sensor than stock? First I have the car tuned with a WB, VE and MAF.
Do they make a more accurate O2 sensor than the stockers, I am going to run MAF CL and my stock O2's (I have 3 sets, just bought new ones) are not that accurate until they get good and hot I am guessing, and I have CL enable set at 169 deg. to try and assist but only one out of every few scans do the stft's start out correct within 4-5% at the beginning of CL enable,cheap dreamweaver the other's they are rich or lean (usually no more than 10% but I don't like that) and always after 10 minutes or so they will be reading correct but it usually takes 10 minutes or so after reaching OT to read out correct. Do they make any that are not prone to this that can be used in place of the stockers?
Do they make a more accurate O2 sensor than the stockers, I am going to run MAF CL and my stock O2's (I have 3 sets, just bought new ones) are not that accurate until they get good and hot I am guessing, and I have CL enable set at 169 deg. to try and assist but only one out of every few scans do the stft's start out correct within 4-5% at the beginning of CL enable,cheap dreamweaver the other's they are rich or lean (usually no more than 10% but I don't like that) and always after 10 minutes or so they will be reading correct but it usually takes 10 minutes or so after reaching OT to read out correct. Do they make any that are not prone to this that can be used in place of the stockers?
Last edited by fzgtech; 11-27-2010 at 04:55 AM.
