How much more power would a fast 92 and 1 7/8 headers add?
#1
How much more power would a fast 92 and 1 7/8 headers add?
I've been thinking about doing heads on my cam only car and was curious if adding a fast and bigger headers would be worth the money. I currently have an ls6 intake and ported tb with BBK long tubes and was wondering how much hp I'd be leaving on the table if I didn't change them.
#3
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ny
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm actually doing just what u said lol. My car is currently a vindicator cam zo6 cnc 243 head car with 11:6:1 comp. I just sold my buddy my ls6 and pacetters 1 3/4 headers bc I picked up a fast 92/92 setup and a set of kooks 1 3/4 stepped to 1/78 headers. I'm currently making my own v banded y pipe. From people I've talked to with experience with similar setups to mine picked up 15-20 hp going from pacetters to kooks. The fast night be another 10-15. So your looking at decent gains. Your bbk headers are known to not be the greatest out there so you might pick up more. Ball flange headers suck for flow. But we will see next season the diff it makes on my car. And for the record I only switched bc I got killer deals on the fast and kooks headers. But as in any build the diff in each setup will account for diff gains. Higher comp is the best bang for the buck and will allow you to run a larger header without losing as much tq. My car has been a total budget build and runs with cars with way more money in them.
#6
I can't find the thread about this, a member here had a car with heads and cam with 1 3/4" Kooks headers, He felt that the car had more potential he swapped to kooks 1 7/8" and gained about 15hp. The dyno showed no loss of power from any low rpm ( which is a huge myth that I come across with LS1's ). On top of that You want to switch to a fast 92 without a doubt your going to gain from switching that also. If you switch both fast 92m and 1 7/8" Long tube headers at min 20hp. My opinion I would do both, Because I want every hp possible out of the engine to get that victory.
#7
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Falling Waters, WV
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been really debating this myself. I have a heads and cam car with some old 1 3/4 hookers and a LS6 intake. I really don't think this stuff is worth the money, but I'm going to redo the exhaust(don't like dumps) and would like to do a tune and be done all at once. It's just tough to justify the expense for the gain.
Trending Topics
#9
I've been really debating this myself. I have a heads and cam car with some old 1 3/4 hookers and a LS6 intake. I really don't think this stuff is worth the money, but I'm going to redo the exhaust(don't like dumps) and would like to do a tune and be done all at once. It's just tough to justify the expense for the gain.
#12
Thats the plan right now, but I'm undecided what route to take as far as heads. All depends on what Im willing to spend.
The y-pipe does have a good merge and I have a good flowing catback, but Im pretty sure its only a 2.5". The car put down good power (before I put in a new rear) when I dynoed it so Im not sure how much of a restriction it would become with heads.
The y-pipe does have a good merge and I have a good flowing catback, but Im pretty sure its only a 2.5". The car put down good power (before I put in a new rear) when I dynoed it so Im not sure how much of a restriction it would become with heads.
#14
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
I can't find the thread about this, a member here had a car with heads and cam with 1 3/4" Kooks headers, He felt that the car had more potential he swapped to kooks 1 7/8" and gained about 15hp. The dyno showed no loss of power from any low rpm ( which is a huge myth that I come across with LS1's ). On top of that You want to switch to a fast 92 without a doubt your going to gain from switching that also. If you switch both fast 92m and 1 7/8" Long tube headers at min 20hp. My opinion I would do both, Because I want every hp possible out of the engine to get that victory.
Here is the thread https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...yno-sheet.html
#16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
The 2.5"pipes on the BBK Y-pipe are good to about 500 flywheel hp, so it's not your first restriction. The first restriction is the 3" single outlet, and all on back. A single 3" pipe is only good to about 370 flywheel hp before it starts becoming a restriction. I'd put your money towards a set of heads first, then a set of 1-7/8" headers with the companion Y-pipe with at least a 3.5" or larger exit, and finally the FAST 92 intake manifold.
Last edited by 99Bluz28; 09-29-2014 at 06:55 PM.
#17
That was me. I went from Kooks to Kooks and gained 20rwhp 15rwtq from just headers. Then another 20rwhp from a ported FAST 92 setup. I went from 420 to 461rwhp on the same dyno. I already had H/C with true duals.
Here is the thread https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...yno-sheet.html
Here is the thread https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...yno-sheet.html
#20
I would hope its more than 10hp for a fast. Another dilema Ive been thinking about is that if I went all out and did good ported heads and intake/bigger headers, thats easy $3k after its all said and done. I could do a procharger for a grand more if I bought an ebay front mount with piping and pieced a kit together.