Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help upgrading my 97 LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2010, 11:51 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
radioflyer86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Help upgrading my 97 LS1

I've been able to save some $$ to finally put some HP in my 97 Corvette. Budget for parts is >$2000. Install will be done by Frank's Vettes. (i don't mind using pre-owned parts) As it stands, I currently have


97 LS1 stock heads/bottom end.
1.8 YT rockers
Vararam CAI intake w/ LS6 manifold
SSAC mid-length headers and Borla stinger exhaust
Ford SVO 30lb lucas injectors

This resulted in 328rwhp/327rwtq on the last test (dynojet). Got some valve float on the stock springs above 5000rpm, but I will address that below.

Planned list:
- 243 heads (will still use the YT 1.8 rockers)
- upgraded pushrods
- upgraded springs
- ASP underdrive pulley
- Cam
- double roller timing chain

I'd like to get most of my gains in the bottom end starting at 2500rpm. My car is a daily driver street car and i'm not looking to set any strip or autocross records. just get some more umph. I'd like the car to have a stealthy smooth idle if possible.

What cam specs should I be looking for? What pushrod length to match the cam with the 1.8 rockers?

I figure swapping the Heads and Cam for the 02+ ZO6 parts i would get at least 405hp at the crank for a decent price. I figured that while i'm having this done, any tinkering to make the system work better would be easy to do.
Old 05-24-2010, 12:21 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Fb0dy0nly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit ROCK City
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thunder Racing makes a sleeper cam good for these engines. They are a sponsor for the site. There are a few cam guys on this site that can spec you a cam just the way you;d like it. "Patrick G" can def help you there or even talking a shop who can ground you a cam too works. You could stick with the z06 stuff but there is better cams out there that will meet your goals much more efficiently.
Old 05-24-2010, 03:01 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-town West Burbs
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

1.8 rockers is going to limit your cam choices. There is a member here running mid 10's with a 216/224, 1.8's, fast 90, and afr 205's. That's at 3100 race weight.
Old 05-24-2010, 05:33 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
radioflyer86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm talking to a the following shops about custom grind cams for my application:

SDPC, Texas Speed and Thunder racing.

Hoping to get a package deal on a kit if i can.


Update:
SDPC suggested this guy:

221/226 .565/.560 114

http://sdparts.com/details/scoggin-d...-center/sd0067

More lift and longer duration than the LS6 but with a 114 LSA vs a 117 LSA would make me think it idles smooth with good low/mid power.

What say ye?

Last edited by radioflyer86; 05-24-2010 at 07:20 PM.
Old 05-25-2010, 12:40 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (13)
 
ultradriver10000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Woodlands/N.Houston
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Frank's vette in Houston? If so I had a bad experience with them.

Go with a bigger aftermarket cam if you're going through all that work.
Old 05-26-2010, 12:12 AM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
radioflyer86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ultradriver10000
Frank's vette in Houston? If so I had a bad experience with them.

Go with a bigger aftermarket cam if you're going through all that work.
You had a bad experience with Frank? How so? I've heard nothing but high praise from everyone who's ever had work done there.
Old 05-26-2010, 01:03 AM
  #7  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

If by stealthy you mean near stock idle, then you need something that is gonna be about -16° overlap at the highest. Just to compare: The LS6 camshaft has either -20° or -23° depending on the year.
Old 05-26-2010, 01:18 AM
  #8  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
radioflyer86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
If by stealthy you mean near stock idle, then you need something that is gonna be about -16° overlap at the highest. Just to compare: The LS6 camshaft has either -20° or -23° depending on the year.
The 02+ LS6 cam has an acceptable idle sound for my tastes. Smooth is what i'm looking for or at least harmonically balanced vibration. I'm trying to avoid shaking the car like what happens with monster cams.
Old 05-26-2010, 01:36 AM
  #9  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

My thoughts:

-Unless you're going to run a GM cam, ditch the YT rockers.
-Why a double roller? An LS2 timing chain is more than plenty for what you're doing and doesn't require replacing the crank gear.
-If in fact you do decide to use 243's and an 02+ Z06 cam, cut the heads .020 or so. It'll give you almost a full point in compression. Compression is free HP that doesn't affect driveability.

Lastly, there's quite a few cam combination's that'll work great with 243's, make a ton of power under the curve, and drive very smooth. But you will not be able to run any of them with 1.8 rockers.

Good luck.
Old 05-26-2010, 01:52 AM
  #10  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I wouldnt let a semi lopey cam shy you away from the power it can bring you though. I really think you should sell the YT's and pickup a set of stockers with the trunion upgrade and run a larger cam. Depending on who tunes your car they may be able to hide a mild cam pretty well and still give you great driveability.

I'm not sure what the 97 LS1 Vettes had stock, but I would think it would either be 202/210 .496/.496 116 LSA or extremely similar.

Personally, I wouldn't shoot for 405 at the crank. You can easily get leaps and bounds over that for the same amount of labor and basically the same cost. Unless for some reason the 97 PCM is as big of a pile as the ones in the 98 fbodies. Essentially you will be swapping stock for stock with a larger rocker as it stands.

Also Josh is right. As soon as you are done putting a 5pt harness on your lazy-boy start on the install of the double roller. It really is in excess of what your goals are power wise by a LOOOONNNGGGG shot. People that say they break their single chains usually have a balancing problem that just raped the harmonics and forked the chain. Pick up an LS2 timing set and move on. Its about the best reassurance you can get at literally 1/4 of the cost of a DR.
Old 05-26-2010, 02:02 AM
  #11  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-town West Burbs
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by radioflyer86
I'm talking to a the following shops about custom grind cams for my application:

SDPC, Texas Speed and Thunder racing.

Hoping to get a package deal on a kit if i can.


Update:
SDPC suggested this guy:

221/226 .565/.560 114

http://sdparts.com/details/scoggin-d...-center/sd0067

More lift and longer duration than the LS6 but with a 114 LSA vs a 117 LSA would make me think it idles smooth with good low/mid power.

What say ye?
You aren't looking in the right places.

How does 430 REAR WHEEL hp and 415 REAR WHEEL tq with STOCK 243's and a BABY CAM sound? The guy's wife drives the car and didn't even notice it has a cam in it.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...k-results.html
Old 05-26-2010, 02:19 AM
  #12  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Man, that EPS cam makes an MS3 look like a weiner cam on the results.
Old 05-26-2010, 08:00 AM
  #13  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
radioflyer86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Damian
My thoughts:

-Unless you're going to run a GM cam, ditch the YT rockers.
-Why a double roller? An LS2 timing chain is more than plenty for what you're doing and doesn't require replacing the crank gear.
-If in fact you do decide to use 243's and an 02+ Z06 cam, cut the heads .020 or so. It'll give you almost a full point in compression. Compression is free HP that doesn't affect driveability.

Lastly, there's quite a few cam combination's that'll work great with 243's, make a ton of power under the curve, and drive very smooth. But you will not be able to run any of them with 1.8 rockers.

Good luck.
Originally i was under the impression that a double roller was the ONLY upgrade to a single roller. I didn't know they made Heavy duty singles.

What do you mean by "cutting the heads 020"? Is this porting or something different?

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
Personally, I wouldn't shoot for 405 at the crank. You can easily get leaps and bounds over that for the same amount of labor and basically the same cost. Unless for some reason the 97 PCM is as big of a pile as the ones in the 98 fbodies. Essentially you will be swapping stock for stock with a larger rocker as it stands.
I've already got 410 at the crank accounting for a 20% drivetrain loss of the A4.
Old 05-26-2010, 01:31 PM
  #14  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally i was under the impression that a double roller was the ONLY upgrade to a single roller. I didn't know they made Heavy duty singles.

What do you mean by "cutting the heads 020"? Is this porting or something different?
There are tons of single options including LS2, C5R, etc etc. The LS2 is a cheap replacement, and strong enough for any heads/cam application.

What I meant by cutting the heads is milling the deck .020. It will make the chamber smaller, and build compression. Compression = free HP/TQ.
Old 05-26-2010, 01:39 PM
  #15  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
radioflyer86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Damian
There are tons of single options including LS2, C5R, etc etc. The LS2 is a cheap replacement, and strong enough for any heads/cam application.

What I meant by cutting the heads is milling the deck .020. It will make the chamber smaller, and build compression. Compression = free HP/TQ.
How much additional compression are we talking? If i remember the LS1 800 series heads weree 9.5:1 and the LS6 243 were 10.5:1
Old 05-26-2010, 04:43 PM
  #16  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Milling .020 will put you a hair over 11:1, which is a good thing.
Old 05-26-2010, 06:05 PM
  #17  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
radioflyer86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Damian
Milling .020 will put you a hair over 11:1, which is a good thing.
How much of a good thing? How will this affect drivability, idle, performance, vibration etc?

Any downsides other than cost?
Old 05-26-2010, 07:39 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
IWGF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 1,268
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It won't effect any of that. Just give ya free umph.
Old 05-26-2010, 07:46 PM
  #19  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by radioflyer86
How much of a good thing? How will this affect drivability, idle, performance, vibration etc?

Any downsides other than cost?
It will not change any of that. That's not how compression works.

The only "downside" would be having to run premium gas. You can't run cheap gas with high compression. But hopefully you're not running cheap gas in a modded Vette anyway.
Old 05-26-2010, 07:57 PM
  #20  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
radioflyer86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Damian
It will not change any of that. That's not how compression works.

The only "downside" would be having to run premium gas. You can't run cheap gas with high compression. But hopefully you're not running cheap gas in a modded Vette anyway.
93 octane from the pump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.