Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ring gap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2013, 01:23 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
06Sierra2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: el paso, tx
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default ring gap

Ive searched and there seems to b alot of misleading information. Which ring gap is supposed to b larger? I have seen threads in which people claim the 2nd and top.should.b larger! I'm about to build a stroker, eventually nitrous...
Old 05-05-2013, 01:45 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
TexasGMC08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Area
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 06Sierra2
Ive searched and there seems to b alot of misleading information. Which ring gap is supposed to b larger? I have seen threads in which people claim the 2nd and top.should.b larger! I'm about to build a stroker, eventually nitrous...
The set of rings you buy will have or should have a gap chart with app your going to run.... Im going to run Nitrous so the Chart told me the gap for the top ring should be .0050, and the second ring should be .0055 and this were Wiseco rings.

Last edited by TexasGMC08; 05-05-2013 at 07:13 PM.
Old 05-05-2013, 06:21 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
RezinTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Joseph Potak's book has a universal ring end gap sizing chart, I suggest buying that book.

In ALL cases, the 2nd ring end gap is bigger than the top ring.

Quote:

"The problem with having the second ring smaller than the top ring gap is that combustion will always be captured in between the two compression rings with nowhere to go. This usually leads to second ring flutter when that captured combustion attempts to escape in any way it can."
Old 05-05-2013, 09:39 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
06Sierra2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: el paso, tx
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ok thanks guys, I had read that as well and seen the Wiseco chart but seen a few people with the 2nd ring tighter and was confused. I'll more than likely go .005 and .0055 as well.

Last edited by 06Sierra2; 05-05-2013 at 10:30 AM.
Old 05-05-2013, 09:48 AM
  #5  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Please don't gap your rings .050" and .055". I think you mean .005" and .0055" per inch of bore.. Even then, that's big unless its a BIG power adder combo.
Old 05-05-2013, 10:29 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
06Sierra2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: el paso, tx
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Please don't gap your rings .050" and .055". I think you mean .005" and .0055" per inch of bore.. Even then, that's big unless its a BIG power adder combo.
Lol, crap that's what I meant. I hadn't had my coffee yet....
Old 05-06-2013, 11:14 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
TexasGMC08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Area
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Per Wiseco you take your bore size X's the column on the chart and that's the ring gap you need.

my was:
bore 3.906 X's .005 = .017-.019 top ring
.0055=.022 -.024 second ring

link:
http://www.wiseco.com/PDFs/Manuals/RingEndGap.pdf



Quick Reply: ring gap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.