Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

CC's larger than the piston bore...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2015, 01:12 AM
  #1  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default CC's larger than the piston bore...

How come CC's that become larger than the piston bore don't suffer from flow loss? For example: a 3.898" combustion chamber growing to 4" when the intake valve is un-shrouded? The benefit of un-shrouding the valve is understood. What's not clear is why the step from the outside edge of the CC to the smaller piston bore doesn't cause an airflow interruption large enough to be an added restriction.

Maybe it's that the overlap only takes place over a small area; approx. 25* over the radius?
Old 10-04-2015, 10:44 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
tug686spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 799
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I had the same thought while reading your other thread on head gaskets for after market heads. My opinion is that it will drop flow to lower than it was before it was opened up. In its unopened form it had the smoothest transition possible from combustion chamber to bore. Now with it opened up and having a step in from the combustion chamber to the bore its creating an area of turbulence that is effectively making the bore even smaller in terms of air flow.
Old 10-04-2015, 02:26 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tug686spd
My opinion is that it will drop flow to lower than it was before it was opened up. In its unopened form it had the smoothest transition possible from combustion chamber to bore. Now with it opened up and having a step in from the combustion chamber to the bore its creating an area of turbulence that is effectively making the bore even smaller in terms of air flow.

Yah, it's confusing to me when highly respected head porters routinely de-shroud the intake valve; thereby, causing the step to the bore. Because they choose to do it, there MUST be a benefit greater than any loss caused by the step. Otherwise, they wouldn't do it. As noted, above, I have a$$umed that it has something to do w/ the fact that the step is limited to a very short part (along the radius) above the cylinder bore (maybe 1.75"-2" along the radius on the outside of the intake valve).

Have heard of guys porting/sloping the top edge of the cylinder bore (not so far down as to cause a top ring issue) in order to smooth out the effect of the step. That method is a bit extreme for my taste.
Old 10-05-2015, 08:38 AM
  #4  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1-450
Yah, it's confusing to me when highly respected head porters routinely de-shroud the intake valve; thereby, causing the step to the bore. Because they choose to do it, there MUST be a benefit greater than any loss caused by the step. Otherwise, they wouldn't do it. As noted, above, I have a$$umed that it has something to do w/ the fact that the step is limited to a very short part (along the radius) above the cylinder bore (maybe 1.75"-2" along the radius on the outside of the intake valve).

Have heard of guys porting/sloping the top edge of the cylinder bore (not so far down as to cause a top ring issue) in order to smooth out the effect of the step. That method is a bit extreme for my taste.
There's usually at least a chamfer or radius on the top of the bore, depending on what equipment is used to make it. It's either a 45 degree chamfer or a bit of a radius, but the main reason is to help the rings into the cylinder without getting stuck.

Cylinder head guys are emphasizing low and mid lift flow these days. I suppose the deshrouded chamber helps the low and midlift flow numbers, where the cylinder pressure is lowest, and when the valve is fully open to where that step you're talking about may have an affect, it's not really at a time when the affect is detrimental.
Old 10-05-2015, 10:12 AM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
There's usually at least a chamfer or radius on the top of the bore, depending on what equipment is used to make it. It's either a 45 degree chamfer or a bit of a radius, but the main reason is to help the rings into the cylinder without getting stuck.

Understood. Was referring to a relief/port/slope added only to the area of the edge (previously chamfered or not) directly below the extended CC for the specific purpose of smoothing out the effect of the step. I don't know or understand anything more about it other than what was read while searching. Found guys discussing it on Yellowbullet.

I suppose the deshrouded chamber...to where that step you're talking about may have an affect, it's not really at a time when the affect is detrimental.
Hadn't considered the where & when. That is probably why the step is not a big issue w/ head porters..
Old 10-05-2015, 10:36 AM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

I'm also guessing that the head gasket makes some difference here as well. That step isn't right up against the head due to the head gasket, so there is still some room (.041") for the air to pull through there. That's where I could see a smaller bore head gasket really hurting you, because it would defeat the shrouding and possibly even be counter-productive.



Quick Reply: CC's larger than the piston bore...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.